Comparative Testing of Cable Bolt and Wire Rope Lacing Resistance to Static and Dynamic Loads

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING
A. Pytlik, MAriuSz Szot
{"title":"Comparative Testing of Cable Bolt and Wire Rope Lacing Resistance to Static and Dynamic Loads","authors":"A. Pytlik, MAriuSz Szot","doi":"10.24425/ams.2023.148158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the conduction of mining activity under the conditions of rock bursts and rock mass tremors means that designers often utilise support systems comprising various configurations of steel arch, rock bolt and surface support. Particularly difficult geological and mining conditions, when wire mesh does not provide sufficient dynamic resistance, it requires an additional reinforcement with wire rope lacing in the form of steel ropes installed between the bolt ends and fixed to them by means of various rope clamps (e.g. u-bolt clamps). Bench tests were conducted to compare the strength of wire ropes under static and dynamic loading. the tests involved wire ropes with an internal diameter of Ø15.7 mm. tests under static loading demonstrated that the cable bolts transferred a maximum force F s max = 289.0 kn without failure, while the energy absorbed until failure was E 1 s = 16.6 kj. A comparative test result analysis for the wire ropes used in the bolt designs revealed that the influence of dynamic loading forces has a significant effect on reducing the rope load capacity, which results in the brittle cracking of the wires in the rope. Although the average dynamic force leading to wire rope failure F d max = 279.1 kn is comparable to the minimum static force F min = 279 kn defined in the relevant standard, the average energy E 1 d absorbed by the cable bolt until failure is 48% lower than the energy E 1 s determined for wire rope failure under static loading. Furthermore, cable bolt failure under dynamic loading occurred at an impact velocity of the combined ram and crosshead masses ranging within v p = 1.4-1.5 m/s.","PeriodicalId":55468,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Mining Sciences","volume":" 1262","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Mining Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/ams.2023.148158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MINING & MINERAL PROCESSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the conduction of mining activity under the conditions of rock bursts and rock mass tremors means that designers often utilise support systems comprising various configurations of steel arch, rock bolt and surface support. Particularly difficult geological and mining conditions, when wire mesh does not provide sufficient dynamic resistance, it requires an additional reinforcement with wire rope lacing in the form of steel ropes installed between the bolt ends and fixed to them by means of various rope clamps (e.g. u-bolt clamps). Bench tests were conducted to compare the strength of wire ropes under static and dynamic loading. the tests involved wire ropes with an internal diameter of Ø15.7 mm. tests under static loading demonstrated that the cable bolts transferred a maximum force F s max = 289.0 kn without failure, while the energy absorbed until failure was E 1 s = 16.6 kj. A comparative test result analysis for the wire ropes used in the bolt designs revealed that the influence of dynamic loading forces has a significant effect on reducing the rope load capacity, which results in the brittle cracking of the wires in the rope. Although the average dynamic force leading to wire rope failure F d max = 279.1 kn is comparable to the minimum static force F min = 279 kn defined in the relevant standard, the average energy E 1 d absorbed by the cable bolt until failure is 48% lower than the energy E 1 s determined for wire rope failure under static loading. Furthermore, cable bolt failure under dynamic loading occurred at an impact velocity of the combined ram and crosshead masses ranging within v p = 1.4-1.5 m/s.
电缆螺栓和钢丝绳绑扎耐静态和动态载荷的比较测试
在岩爆和岩体震颤条件下进行采矿活动,意味着设计人员经常使用由各种钢拱架、锚杆和表面支撑组成的支撑系统。在地质和采矿条件特别恶劣的情况下,当钢丝网不能提供足够的动态阻力时,就需要用钢丝绳绑扎的方式进行额外加固,钢丝绳绑扎的形式是安装在螺栓端部之间,并用各种绳夹固定(如 U 型螺栓夹)。进行了台架试验,以比较钢丝绳在静态和动态载荷下的强度。试验涉及内径为 Ø15.7 mm 的钢丝绳。静态载荷下的试验表明,缆索螺栓传递的最大力 F s max = 289.0 kn 没有发生故障,而直到故障为止所吸收的能量为 E 1 s = 16.6 kj。对螺栓设计中使用的钢丝绳进行的对比测试结果分析表明,动态载荷力对降低钢丝绳承载能力有显著影响,从而导致钢丝绳中的钢丝脆裂。虽然导致钢丝绳失效的平均动态力 F d max = 279.1 kn 与相关标准中规定的最小静态力 F min = 279 kn 相当,但缆索螺栓在失效前吸收的平均能量 E 1 d 比静态载荷下钢丝绳失效时测定的能量 E 1 s 低 48%。此外,缆索螺栓在动态载荷下失效时,撞锤和十字头质量的冲击速度在 v p = 1.4-1.5 m/s 之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Mining Sciences
Archives of Mining Sciences 工程技术-矿业与矿物加工
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Mining Sciences (AMS) is concerned with original research, new developments and case studies in mining sciences and energy, civil engineering and environmental engineering. The journal provides an international forum for the publication of high quality research results in: mining technologies, mineral processing, stability of mine workings, mining machine science, ventilation systems, rock mechanics, termodynamics, underground storage of oil and gas, mining and engineering geology, geotechnical engineering, tunnelling, design and construction of tunnels, design and construction on mining areas, mining geodesy, environmental protection in mining, revitalisation of postindustrial areas. Papers are welcomed on all relevant topics and especially on theoretical developments, analytical methods, numerical methods, rock testing, site investigation, and case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信