THE PROBLEMS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PRESCRIPTION INSTITUTION IN THE INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH CARE IN GEORGIA

T. Verulava
{"title":"THE PROBLEMS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PRESCRIPTION INSTITUTION IN THE INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH CARE IN GEORGIA","authors":"T. Verulava","doi":"10.52244/ep.2023.26.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs realized reform from 1th february till 1th september in 2014 for prescription system implementation. According to these changes pharmaceutical products of second group becamethe prescription medicines. In Georgia, access to and supply Rx medicines is governed by a regulatory framework. Second group drugs are only available to the public when prescribed by doctors on new prescription form N 3. The aim of research is to reveal and evaluate positive and negative sides of new prescription system; to study it, sinfluence on achievement process to drugs. As part of the quantitative research, doctors and pharmacists of the medical institution were interviewed. As part of the qualitative research, in-depth interviews with healthcare experts were conducted. The special questionnaire was designed for each aimed group. The questionnaires consist of open and closed questions. The results of the study revealed the positive aspects of the Prescription Institute: with this reform, the system returned to the logic of normal clinical medicine; The role of the doctor in relation to the patient's pharmacotherapy has been strengthened; The competence of the pharmacist was included in the appropriate framework and the specific skills of selling medicinal products by prescription were developed; The culture of purchasing medicines with prescriptions has been established among the population; At the same time, the results of the research revealed such actual problems that are an obstacle to the introduction of the prescription institute: prescription drugs are sold without a prescription; In the doctor's offices opened next to the pharmacies, the doctor is limited to prescribing only prescriptions; In case of chronic or long-term diseases, patients' access to prescription drugs is complicated; Doctors do not have complete information about the dispensing mode of this or that pharmaceutical product from the pharmacy. Pharmacists talk about the lack of specific skills in prescribing prescriptions: in the case of more than one medicine prescribed on one prescription form, the prescription is cancelled; Prescriptions not certified with a seal are invalid; Incorrectly indicated generic name, inconsistency between generic and trade names, prescription of a combined pharmaceutical product with a generic name prolongs the service of the user; Incorrectly indicated course of treatment, drug release forms, medicinal dose are the cause of misunderstanding; e.g. A pharmacist is prohibited from selling a 10 mg tablet of the same name medicine instead of a specified 5 mg tablet. One of the goals of the reform planned by the Ministry of Health is the correct treatment, the reduction of the share of expenses on medicine and the harm caused by self-medication. It is too early to talk about these achievements within the framework of the conducted research, however, one of the details was revealed that will contribute to the reduction of expenses on medicines, namely: it is necessary to indicate the diagnosis in the prescription according to ACD-10; The doctor's prescription should always be consistent with the diagnosis; The institute of prescriptions should reveal the rationality of the prescription issued by the doctor, compliance with the guidelines, which will partially reduce the costs of medicines. The reform implemented in connection with the restoration and establishment of the Institute of Recipes in Georgia is a step forward. The medical community unequivocally welcomes this change. The competence and authority of the doctor increased; the specific rules for prescribing by a doctor and issuing prescription medication by a pharmacist are gradually being established. Along with the highlighted positive aspects, significant systemic errors and technical flaws are visible. The sale of drugs of the second group without a prescription is an obstacle to the introduction of the Institute of Prescriptions. At this stage, fining the pharmacy cannot solve the problem. The Ministry of Health considers the establishment of an electronic prescription system to eliminate this problem. The current activity of the \"pharmacy\" doctor also hinders the reform. Access to medicines for patients with chronic diseases is complicated. The existing classification of medicines has flaws. Recommendations Based on the conducted research, the following recommendations were developed: • Improving the administration of the prescription institute implementation process; • Study of the activities of \"pharmacy\" doctors by the Agency for the Regulation of Medical Activities; • Refinement of regulatory normative base, administration tools; • Revision of the classification of pharmaceutical products and periodically making rational changes taking into account the data of AMEA, WHO, PSUR; • In order to use medicines rationally, it is advisable to introduce a system of electronic prescriptions.","PeriodicalId":344544,"journal":{"name":"Economic Profile","volume":"9 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Profile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52244/ep.2023.26.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs realized reform from 1th february till 1th september in 2014 for prescription system implementation. According to these changes pharmaceutical products of second group becamethe prescription medicines. In Georgia, access to and supply Rx medicines is governed by a regulatory framework. Second group drugs are only available to the public when prescribed by doctors on new prescription form N 3. The aim of research is to reveal and evaluate positive and negative sides of new prescription system; to study it, sinfluence on achievement process to drugs. As part of the quantitative research, doctors and pharmacists of the medical institution were interviewed. As part of the qualitative research, in-depth interviews with healthcare experts were conducted. The special questionnaire was designed for each aimed group. The questionnaires consist of open and closed questions. The results of the study revealed the positive aspects of the Prescription Institute: with this reform, the system returned to the logic of normal clinical medicine; The role of the doctor in relation to the patient's pharmacotherapy has been strengthened; The competence of the pharmacist was included in the appropriate framework and the specific skills of selling medicinal products by prescription were developed; The culture of purchasing medicines with prescriptions has been established among the population; At the same time, the results of the research revealed such actual problems that are an obstacle to the introduction of the prescription institute: prescription drugs are sold without a prescription; In the doctor's offices opened next to the pharmacies, the doctor is limited to prescribing only prescriptions; In case of chronic or long-term diseases, patients' access to prescription drugs is complicated; Doctors do not have complete information about the dispensing mode of this or that pharmaceutical product from the pharmacy. Pharmacists talk about the lack of specific skills in prescribing prescriptions: in the case of more than one medicine prescribed on one prescription form, the prescription is cancelled; Prescriptions not certified with a seal are invalid; Incorrectly indicated generic name, inconsistency between generic and trade names, prescription of a combined pharmaceutical product with a generic name prolongs the service of the user; Incorrectly indicated course of treatment, drug release forms, medicinal dose are the cause of misunderstanding; e.g. A pharmacist is prohibited from selling a 10 mg tablet of the same name medicine instead of a specified 5 mg tablet. One of the goals of the reform planned by the Ministry of Health is the correct treatment, the reduction of the share of expenses on medicine and the harm caused by self-medication. It is too early to talk about these achievements within the framework of the conducted research, however, one of the details was revealed that will contribute to the reduction of expenses on medicines, namely: it is necessary to indicate the diagnosis in the prescription according to ACD-10; The doctor's prescription should always be consistent with the diagnosis; The institute of prescriptions should reveal the rationality of the prescription issued by the doctor, compliance with the guidelines, which will partially reduce the costs of medicines. The reform implemented in connection with the restoration and establishment of the Institute of Recipes in Georgia is a step forward. The medical community unequivocally welcomes this change. The competence and authority of the doctor increased; the specific rules for prescribing by a doctor and issuing prescription medication by a pharmacist are gradually being established. Along with the highlighted positive aspects, significant systemic errors and technical flaws are visible. The sale of drugs of the second group without a prescription is an obstacle to the introduction of the Institute of Prescriptions. At this stage, fining the pharmacy cannot solve the problem. The Ministry of Health considers the establishment of an electronic prescription system to eliminate this problem. The current activity of the "pharmacy" doctor also hinders the reform. Access to medicines for patients with chronic diseases is complicated. The existing classification of medicines has flaws. Recommendations Based on the conducted research, the following recommendations were developed: • Improving the administration of the prescription institute implementation process; • Study of the activities of "pharmacy" doctors by the Agency for the Regulation of Medical Activities; • Refinement of regulatory normative base, administration tools; • Revision of the classification of pharmaceutical products and periodically making rational changes taking into account the data of AMEA, WHO, PSUR; • In order to use medicines rationally, it is advisable to introduce a system of electronic prescriptions.
在格鲁吉亚医疗卫生体制发展中实施处方制度的问题
劳动、卫生和社会事务部从 2014 年 2 月 1 日至 9 月 1 日对处方制度的实施进行了改革。根据这些改革,第二类药品成为处方药。在格鲁吉亚,处方药的获取和供应受监管框架制约。第二类药品只有在医生根据新的 N 3 处方表格开具处方后才能向公众提供。研究的目的是揭示和评估新处方制度的积极和消极方面,研究它对药物获得过程的影响。作为定量研究的一部分,对医疗机构的医生和药剂师进行了访谈。作为定性研究的一部分,对医疗专家进行了深入访谈。针对每个目标群体设计了专门的调查问卷。问卷由开放式问题和封闭式问题组成。研究结果显示了处方药机构的积极方面:通过这次改革,医疗系统回归到了正常的临床医学逻辑;医生在病人药物治疗方面的作用得到了加强;药剂师的能力被纳入了适当的框架,并发展了根据处方销售药品的特殊技能;在居民中建立了凭处方购买药品的文化;与此同时,研究结果还揭示了一些实际问题,这些问题阻碍了处方药机构的引入:处方药的销售没有处方;在药房旁边开设的医生办公室里,医生只能开处方;如果是慢性病或长期疾病,病人获得处方药的途径很复杂;医生对药房配发这种或那种药品的方式没有完整的信息。药剂师谈到在开处方时缺乏特殊技能:如果在一张处方单上开了不止一种药,处方就会被取消;没有盖章证明的处方是无效的;不正确地标明通用名、通用名和商品名不一致、开具通用名的联合药品处方会延长用户的服务时间;不正确地标明疗程、药物释放形式、药物剂量是造成误解的原因;例如,药剂师在开处方时被禁止开具处方。g. 禁止药剂师出售 10 毫克的同名药品片剂,而不是指定的 5 毫克片剂。卫生部计划进行的改革的目标之一是正确治疗、减少药品开支和自我药疗造成的伤害。在已开展的研究框架内谈论这些成就还为时尚早,但其中一个细节已被披露,这将有助于减少药费支出,即:有必要根据《ACD-10》在处方中注明诊断;医生的处方应始终与诊断相一致;处方研究所应显示医生开具处方的合理性,遵守准则,这将部分减少药费支出。格鲁吉亚在恢复和建立配方研究所方面实施的改革是向前迈出的一步。医学界明确欢迎这一变革。医生的能力和权威得到了提高;医生开处方和药剂师开处方药的具体规则正在逐步确立。在强调积极方面的同时,也可以看到重大的系统性错误和技术缺陷。无处方销售第二类药品是建立处方研究所的障碍。在现阶段,对药店处以罚款并不能解决问题。卫生部考虑建立电子处方系统来消除这一问题。目前 "药房 "医生的活动也阻碍了改革。慢性病患者获取药品的途径十分复杂。现有的药品分类存在缺陷。建议 根据已开展的研究,提出了以下建议:- 改善处方机构执行过程的管理; - 医疗活动监管机构对 "药房 "医生活动的研究; - 完善监管规范基础和管理工具; - 修订药品分类,并定期根据 AMEA、WHO、PSUR 的数据进行合理修改; - 为了合理用药,最好引入电子处方系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信