Estimation of confidence in the calculated resistance factor for simple limit states with limited data for load and resistance model bias

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
R. Bathurst, Reza Jamshidi Chenari
{"title":"Estimation of confidence in the calculated resistance factor for simple limit states with limited data for load and resistance model bias","authors":"R. Bathurst, Reza Jamshidi Chenari","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2023-0424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimation of the resistance factor in load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration for simple soil-structure limit states is most often based on model bias data of limited size. Frequently, the bias data are only available or required for the resistance term. In this paper, the confidence in the estimate of the mean of the resistance factor is computed for the case of one resistance factor and one load factor where limited model bias data are available for both load and resistance terms. The bootstrap method is used to compute synthetic load and resistance bias data sets from which confidence intervals on the point (mean) estimate of the resistance factor and load factor are computed. A closed-form solution is used to calculate the resistance factor for a single prescribed load factor and target reliability index, bias data, and nominal load and resistance variables that are lognormally distributed. However, the approach is general using Monte Carlo simulation. The method is demonstrated using the case of the internal stability pullout limit state for steel strip mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The example demonstrates the quantitative influence on pullout design using upper and lower 95% confidence interval limits for load and resistance factors.","PeriodicalId":9382,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","volume":"104 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimation of the resistance factor in load and resistance factor design (LRFD) calibration for simple soil-structure limit states is most often based on model bias data of limited size. Frequently, the bias data are only available or required for the resistance term. In this paper, the confidence in the estimate of the mean of the resistance factor is computed for the case of one resistance factor and one load factor where limited model bias data are available for both load and resistance terms. The bootstrap method is used to compute synthetic load and resistance bias data sets from which confidence intervals on the point (mean) estimate of the resistance factor and load factor are computed. A closed-form solution is used to calculate the resistance factor for a single prescribed load factor and target reliability index, bias data, and nominal load and resistance variables that are lognormally distributed. However, the approach is general using Monte Carlo simulation. The method is demonstrated using the case of the internal stability pullout limit state for steel strip mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The example demonstrates the quantitative influence on pullout design using upper and lower 95% confidence interval limits for load and resistance factors.
在载荷和阻力模型偏差数据有限的情况下,估算简单极限状态下计算阻力系数的置信度
在荷载和阻力系数设计(LRFD)校核中,针对简单土壤-结构极限状态的阻力系数估算通常基于规模有限的模型偏置数据。通常情况下,偏差数据只适用于阻力项,或者只需要阻力项的偏差数据。在本文中,计算了在一个阻力系数和一个荷载系数的情况下,荷载和阻力项的有限模型偏差数据对阻力系数平均值估计的置信度。采用自举法计算合成载荷和阻力偏差数据集,并据此计算阻力系数和载荷系数的点(平均值)估计值的置信区间。对于单个规定载荷系数和目标可靠性指数、偏差数据以及对数正态分布的名义载荷和电阻变量,采用闭式求解法计算电阻系数。不过,该方法一般采用蒙特卡罗模拟。该方法以钢带机械稳定土墙(MSE)的内部稳定拉拔极限状态为例进行了演示。该示例利用荷载和阻力系数的 95% 置信区间上限和下限演示了对拉拔设计的定量影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geotechnical Journal features articles, notes, reviews, and discussions related to new developments in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, and applied sciences. The topics of papers written by researchers and engineers/scientists active in industry include soil and rock mechanics, material properties and fundamental behaviour, site characterization, foundations, excavations, tunnels, dams and embankments, slopes, landslides, geological and rock engineering, ground improvement, hydrogeology and contaminant hydrogeology, geochemistry, waste management, geosynthetics, offshore engineering, ice, frozen ground and northern engineering, risk and reliability applications, and physical and numerical modelling. Contributions that have practical relevance are preferred, including case records. Purely theoretical contributions are not generally published unless they are on a topic of special interest (like unsaturated soil mechanics or cold regions geotechnics) or they have direct practical value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信