Impact of antegrade dissection and re-entry technique on coronary percutaneous interventions for chronic total occlusion: the LATAM Chronic Total Occlusion registry

Sebastián Peralta, M. Bettinotti, Ezequiel Zaidel, Guillermo Jubany, Luis Murillo, Andres Mazuquin, Francisco Goldaracena, Luis Sztejfman, Lucio Padilla, João Tinoco, Pedro Oliveira, Alexandre Quadros
{"title":"Impact of antegrade dissection and re-entry technique on coronary percutaneous interventions for chronic total occlusion: the LATAM Chronic Total Occlusion registry","authors":"Sebastián Peralta, M. Bettinotti, Ezequiel Zaidel, Guillermo Jubany, Luis Murillo, Andres Mazuquin, Francisco Goldaracena, Luis Sztejfman, Lucio Padilla, João Tinoco, Pedro Oliveira, Alexandre Quadros","doi":"10.31160/jotci202331a20230012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The newest techniques of percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion may improve technical success. The objectives were to describe safety and efficacy of antegrade dissection and reentry technique as initial revascularization strategy. Methods A multicenter registry from Latin American countries (LATAM Chronic Total Occlusion). Baseline characteristics and outcomes of cases using antegrade dissection and reentry as primary strategy or bailout of antegrade wire escalation were analyzed. Retrograde approach cases were excluded. Physicians used conventional antegrade dissection and reentry technique. Results Out of 1,875 patients analyzed, 50 were planned primary antegrade dissection and reentry and 1,825 planned primary antegrade wire escalation. Primary antegrade dissection and reentry was preferred in older patients, with a history of revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft: primary antegrade dissection and reentry in 33.3% and primary antegrade wire escalation in 13.4%; p<0.001; percutaneous coronary interventions in 66.6% and 48.8%, respectively; p=0.012). Longer chronic total occlusions (30mm [22-41] and 21mm [15-30]; p<0.001), moderate or severe calcification (62% and 42.6%; p=0.008) were associated with the selection of primary antegrade dissection and reentry, instead of primary antegrade wire escalation. There was a significant correlation between increasing J-CTO score (X2=37, df=5; p<0.001), and use of primary antegrade dissection and reentry. Primary antegrade wire escalation had a success rate of 88.4%, and primary antegrade dissection and reentry of 76.7%. For primary antegrade wire escalation and bailout antegrade dissection and reentry, the use of the CrossBoss® device was related to the highest rates of success (92.3% and 82.7%, respectively). Short-term outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion In Latin America, antegrade dissection and reentry was safe and effective, both as primary or bailout strategy, even when used for higher complexity lesions. The use of dedicated devices was related to a higher success rate.","PeriodicalId":494091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","volume":"116 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31160/jotci202331a20230012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The newest techniques of percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion may improve technical success. The objectives were to describe safety and efficacy of antegrade dissection and reentry technique as initial revascularization strategy. Methods A multicenter registry from Latin American countries (LATAM Chronic Total Occlusion). Baseline characteristics and outcomes of cases using antegrade dissection and reentry as primary strategy or bailout of antegrade wire escalation were analyzed. Retrograde approach cases were excluded. Physicians used conventional antegrade dissection and reentry technique. Results Out of 1,875 patients analyzed, 50 were planned primary antegrade dissection and reentry and 1,825 planned primary antegrade wire escalation. Primary antegrade dissection and reentry was preferred in older patients, with a history of revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft: primary antegrade dissection and reentry in 33.3% and primary antegrade wire escalation in 13.4%; p<0.001; percutaneous coronary interventions in 66.6% and 48.8%, respectively; p=0.012). Longer chronic total occlusions (30mm [22-41] and 21mm [15-30]; p<0.001), moderate or severe calcification (62% and 42.6%; p=0.008) were associated with the selection of primary antegrade dissection and reentry, instead of primary antegrade wire escalation. There was a significant correlation between increasing J-CTO score (X2=37, df=5; p<0.001), and use of primary antegrade dissection and reentry. Primary antegrade wire escalation had a success rate of 88.4%, and primary antegrade dissection and reentry of 76.7%. For primary antegrade wire escalation and bailout antegrade dissection and reentry, the use of the CrossBoss® device was related to the highest rates of success (92.3% and 82.7%, respectively). Short-term outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion In Latin America, antegrade dissection and reentry was safe and effective, both as primary or bailout strategy, even when used for higher complexity lesions. The use of dedicated devices was related to a higher success rate.
前行解剖和再通术对冠状动脉经皮介入治疗慢性全闭塞的影响:拉丁美洲慢性全闭塞登记处
背景经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性全闭塞的最新技术可提高技术成功率。目的是描述前行剥离和再入技术作为初始血管再通策略的安全性和有效性。方法 拉丁美洲国家多中心登记(LATAM 慢性全闭塞)。分析了将逆行剥离和再通术作为主要策略或逆行导丝升级的救助策略的病例的基线特征和结果。逆行入路病例除外。医生使用传统的逆行剥离和再入技术。结果 在分析的 1,875 例患者中,有 50 例计划采用原发性逆行剥离和再通术,1,825 例计划采用原发性逆行导线升级术。年龄较大、有血管再通史的患者首选原发性逆行剥离和再入路术(冠状动脉旁路移植术:33.3%的患者采用原发性逆行剥离和再入路术,13.4%的患者采用原发性逆行导线升级术;P<0.001;经皮冠状动脉介入术分别占66.6%和48.8%;P=0.012)。较长的慢性全闭塞(30毫米[22-41]和21毫米[15-30];P<0.001)、中度或重度钙化(62%和42.6%;P=0.008)与选择一级前向夹层和再入,而不是一级前向导线升级有关。J-CTO评分的增加(X2=37,df=5;P<0.001)与使用一级逆行夹层和再介入之间存在明显的相关性。初级前向导线升级的成功率为 88.4%,初级前向剥离和再入的成功率为 76.7%。对于原发性逆行导线升级和保外逆行夹层和再入,使用 CrossBoss® 装置的成功率最高(分别为 92.3% 和 82.7%)。两组的短期疗效相似。结论 在拉丁美洲,前路剥离和再通术是安全有效的,无论是作为主要策略还是救助策略,即使是用于复杂性较高的病变。使用专用设备的成功率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信