Impact of antegrade dissection and re-entry technique on coronary percutaneous interventions for chronic total occlusion: the LATAM Chronic Total Occlusion registry
Sebastián Peralta, M. Bettinotti, Ezequiel Zaidel, Guillermo Jubany, Luis Murillo, Andres Mazuquin, Francisco Goldaracena, Luis Sztejfman, Lucio Padilla, João Tinoco, Pedro Oliveira, Alexandre Quadros
{"title":"Impact of antegrade dissection and re-entry technique on coronary percutaneous interventions for chronic total occlusion: the LATAM Chronic Total Occlusion registry","authors":"Sebastián Peralta, M. Bettinotti, Ezequiel Zaidel, Guillermo Jubany, Luis Murillo, Andres Mazuquin, Francisco Goldaracena, Luis Sztejfman, Lucio Padilla, João Tinoco, Pedro Oliveira, Alexandre Quadros","doi":"10.31160/jotci202331a20230012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The newest techniques of percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion may improve technical success. The objectives were to describe safety and efficacy of antegrade dissection and reentry technique as initial revascularization strategy. Methods A multicenter registry from Latin American countries (LATAM Chronic Total Occlusion). Baseline characteristics and outcomes of cases using antegrade dissection and reentry as primary strategy or bailout of antegrade wire escalation were analyzed. Retrograde approach cases were excluded. Physicians used conventional antegrade dissection and reentry technique. Results Out of 1,875 patients analyzed, 50 were planned primary antegrade dissection and reentry and 1,825 planned primary antegrade wire escalation. Primary antegrade dissection and reentry was preferred in older patients, with a history of revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft: primary antegrade dissection and reentry in 33.3% and primary antegrade wire escalation in 13.4%; p<0.001; percutaneous coronary interventions in 66.6% and 48.8%, respectively; p=0.012). Longer chronic total occlusions (30mm [22-41] and 21mm [15-30]; p<0.001), moderate or severe calcification (62% and 42.6%; p=0.008) were associated with the selection of primary antegrade dissection and reentry, instead of primary antegrade wire escalation. There was a significant correlation between increasing J-CTO score (X2=37, df=5; p<0.001), and use of primary antegrade dissection and reentry. Primary antegrade wire escalation had a success rate of 88.4%, and primary antegrade dissection and reentry of 76.7%. For primary antegrade wire escalation and bailout antegrade dissection and reentry, the use of the CrossBoss® device was related to the highest rates of success (92.3% and 82.7%, respectively). Short-term outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion In Latin America, antegrade dissection and reentry was safe and effective, both as primary or bailout strategy, even when used for higher complexity lesions. The use of dedicated devices was related to a higher success rate.","PeriodicalId":494091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","volume":"116 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31160/jotci202331a20230012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background The newest techniques of percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion may improve technical success. The objectives were to describe safety and efficacy of antegrade dissection and reentry technique as initial revascularization strategy. Methods A multicenter registry from Latin American countries (LATAM Chronic Total Occlusion). Baseline characteristics and outcomes of cases using antegrade dissection and reentry as primary strategy or bailout of antegrade wire escalation were analyzed. Retrograde approach cases were excluded. Physicians used conventional antegrade dissection and reentry technique. Results Out of 1,875 patients analyzed, 50 were planned primary antegrade dissection and reentry and 1,825 planned primary antegrade wire escalation. Primary antegrade dissection and reentry was preferred in older patients, with a history of revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft: primary antegrade dissection and reentry in 33.3% and primary antegrade wire escalation in 13.4%; p<0.001; percutaneous coronary interventions in 66.6% and 48.8%, respectively; p=0.012). Longer chronic total occlusions (30mm [22-41] and 21mm [15-30]; p<0.001), moderate or severe calcification (62% and 42.6%; p=0.008) were associated with the selection of primary antegrade dissection and reentry, instead of primary antegrade wire escalation. There was a significant correlation between increasing J-CTO score (X2=37, df=5; p<0.001), and use of primary antegrade dissection and reentry. Primary antegrade wire escalation had a success rate of 88.4%, and primary antegrade dissection and reentry of 76.7%. For primary antegrade wire escalation and bailout antegrade dissection and reentry, the use of the CrossBoss® device was related to the highest rates of success (92.3% and 82.7%, respectively). Short-term outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion In Latin America, antegrade dissection and reentry was safe and effective, both as primary or bailout strategy, even when used for higher complexity lesions. The use of dedicated devices was related to a higher success rate.