A Systematic Quantitative Review of Literature on Social Justice and Clinical Legal Education in Africa

Anne Kotonya
{"title":"A Systematic Quantitative Review of Literature on Social Justice and Clinical Legal Education in Africa","authors":"Anne Kotonya","doi":"10.19164/ijcle.v30i3.1362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global spread of clinical legal education programs is punctuated by nuances in clinical practices. These result from the diverse priorities placed on clinic missions, the different legal frameworks and foci of educational curricula as well as variances in political and socio-economic realities among countries and regions. Some aspects of these features are reflected in the few existing systematic reviews of clinical scholarship which focus on clinic sustainability or the European continent. This article is a quantitative systematic review of 61 articles published before 2020 in English language legal journals. It contributes a coherent picture of the development and flow of research on the social justice role of clinical legal education in Africa generally and more specifically, in Kenya and South Africa. The results demonstrate that a small group of authors concentrated in particular countries are driving the publication of studies on particular topics in the continent, with diverse methodological approaches, in journals focused on legal education. They co-authored some publications and were highly prolific in their single-authored works. The results provide researchers exploring this topic with an evidence base to advance global scholarship and inform policy and practice on the social justice and pedagogical roles of clinical legal education.","PeriodicalId":31794,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","volume":"32 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/ijcle.v30i3.1362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global spread of clinical legal education programs is punctuated by nuances in clinical practices. These result from the diverse priorities placed on clinic missions, the different legal frameworks and foci of educational curricula as well as variances in political and socio-economic realities among countries and regions. Some aspects of these features are reflected in the few existing systematic reviews of clinical scholarship which focus on clinic sustainability or the European continent. This article is a quantitative systematic review of 61 articles published before 2020 in English language legal journals. It contributes a coherent picture of the development and flow of research on the social justice role of clinical legal education in Africa generally and more specifically, in Kenya and South Africa. The results demonstrate that a small group of authors concentrated in particular countries are driving the publication of studies on particular topics in the continent, with diverse methodological approaches, in journals focused on legal education. They co-authored some publications and were highly prolific in their single-authored works. The results provide researchers exploring this topic with an evidence base to advance global scholarship and inform policy and practice on the social justice and pedagogical roles of clinical legal education.
对非洲社会正义和临床法律教育文献的系统定量审查
临床法学教育项目在全球范围内的推广,与临床实践中的细微差别密不可分。这些差异源于对诊所任务的不同优先考虑、不同的法律框架和教育课程重点,以及不同国家和地区的政治和社会经济现实。这些特点的某些方面反映在现有的为数不多的以诊所可持续性或欧洲大陆为重点的临床学术系统性综述中。本文对 2020 年之前发表在英语法律期刊上的 61 篇文章进行了定量系统性回顾。文章对非洲,尤其是肯尼亚和南非临床法学教育的社会正义作用研究的发展和流向进行了系统梳理。研究结果表明,集中在特定国家的一小部分作者正在推动非洲大陆的一些特定主题的研究成果在以法律教育为重点的期刊上发表,研究方法多种多样。他们合著了一些出版物,并在单篇著作中大量发表。这些成果为探讨这一主题的研究人员提供了证据基础,有助于推动全球学术研究,并为临床法律教育的社会公正和教学作用方面的政策和实践提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信