Legitimacy of The CJEU In the Settlement of Trade Mark Disputes of Non-European Union Foreign Companies: A Case Study

Annas Rasid Musthafa, Satriya Aldi Putrazta, A’an Efendi
{"title":"Legitimacy of The CJEU In the Settlement of Trade Mark Disputes of Non-European Union Foreign Companies: A Case Study","authors":"Annas Rasid Musthafa, Satriya Aldi Putrazta, A’an Efendi","doi":"10.25041/lajil.v5i2.3206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protection of Intellectual Property Rights(IPR) in the industrial world is an urgency for companies to maintain popularity in the general public, Especially on the use of trademarks that greatly affect consumer perceptions. One of the problems in trademark protection is the existence of dispute resolution through court under a supranational organization, namely The Court of Justice of The EU(CJEU), which adjudicates foreign companies originating from non-EU countries. The case is a trademark dispute between China Construction Bank Corp from China and Groupement des cartes bancaires from France.The purpose of this study is to determine the authority and legitimacy as well as the application of justice through The CJEU in resolving disputes of foreign companies. This research was a normative legal research method, which applied to statue approach, case study research, and library research. Based on the results of the research, the authority and legitimacy of The CJEU in resolving disputes with foreign companies has been regulated in the Maastricht treaty and the submission of foreign companies is also related to the opposing party which is a company flagged by a member state of the EU. The use of the CJEU in resolving disputes requires parties to maximize all judicial remedies available at the national level first before proceeding to the international level.","PeriodicalId":34314,"journal":{"name":"Lampung Journal of International Law","volume":"35 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lampung Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v5i2.3206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protection of Intellectual Property Rights(IPR) in the industrial world is an urgency for companies to maintain popularity in the general public, Especially on the use of trademarks that greatly affect consumer perceptions. One of the problems in trademark protection is the existence of dispute resolution through court under a supranational organization, namely The Court of Justice of The EU(CJEU), which adjudicates foreign companies originating from non-EU countries. The case is a trademark dispute between China Construction Bank Corp from China and Groupement des cartes bancaires from France.The purpose of this study is to determine the authority and legitimacy as well as the application of justice through The CJEU in resolving disputes of foreign companies. This research was a normative legal research method, which applied to statue approach, case study research, and library research. Based on the results of the research, the authority and legitimacy of The CJEU in resolving disputes with foreign companies has been regulated in the Maastricht treaty and the submission of foreign companies is also related to the opposing party which is a company flagged by a member state of the EU. The use of the CJEU in resolving disputes requires parties to maximize all judicial remedies available at the national level first before proceeding to the international level.
欧盟法院在解决非欧盟外国公司商标纠纷中的合法性:案例研究
在工业领域,保护知识产权是企业在公众中保持知名度的当务之急,尤其是商标的使用会极大地影响消费者的看法。商标保护中存在的一个问题是,在一个超国家组织--欧盟法院(CJEU)--的领导下,存在通过法院解决争议的途径,该法院负责裁决来自非欧盟国家的外国公司。本研究的目的是确定欧盟法院在解决外国公司争端中的权威性、合法性以及司法的适用性。本研究采用了规范性法律研究方法,包括统计方法、案例研究和图书馆研究。根据研究结果,马斯特里赫特条约规定了欧盟法院在解决外国公司争端中的权威性和合法性,而外国公司的提交也与对方是欧盟成员国的公司有关。利用欧盟法院解决争端要求当事人在诉诸国际层面之前,首先最大限度地利用国家层面的所有司法补救措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信