Evaluating reservoir properties and seal capacities of volcaniclastic rocks for hydrocarbon containment and their application to CO 2 storage

S. Passey, Charlotte E. McLean
{"title":"Evaluating reservoir properties and seal capacities of volcaniclastic rocks for hydrocarbon containment and their application to CO\n 2\n storage","authors":"S. Passey, Charlotte E. McLean","doi":"10.1144/sp547-2023-156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Volcaniclastic rocks are commonly overlooked as reservoirs or seals in hydrocarbon plays because their compositions are variably unstable and reactive during burial diagenesis. This study investigated the petrography and petrophysical characteristics of 60 volcaniclastic and 4 siliciclastic samples from three Paleogene volcanic provinces - East Greenland, Faroe Islands, and Ethiopia. The volcaniclastic samples have highly variable helium porosities (average: 25.2%), but negligible total optical porosities (average: 1.9%) implying reduced reservoir potential. The samples have, however, highly variable air permeabilities (average: 11 mD) suggesting they could make tight reservoirs. The permeabilities are related to either early calcite cements or the devitrification of volcanic glass. Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure (MICP) data was collected for a subset of 33 samples that at leakage/breakthrough saturations could, under near-surface conditions, hold oil column heights of between 4 m and 1181 m (average: 240 m). The best seals consistently have zeolite contents of >20 vol.% due to their small pore throat radii. Conversely, the worst seals are dominated by smectite and a conspicuous absence of zeolite minerals. The zeolite-rich volcaniclastic rocks could, therefore, make good shallow seals. These features also apply to CO\n 2\n storage, but questions remain about the reactivity of the volcanic material and secondary minerals with injected CO\n 2\n , but also the adsorbent properties of zeolites, particularly clinoptilolite, in the presence of CO\n 2\n .\n \n \n Supplementary material at\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6986188\n","PeriodicalId":281618,"journal":{"name":"Geological Society, London, Special Publications","volume":"142 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Society, London, Special Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/sp547-2023-156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volcaniclastic rocks are commonly overlooked as reservoirs or seals in hydrocarbon plays because their compositions are variably unstable and reactive during burial diagenesis. This study investigated the petrography and petrophysical characteristics of 60 volcaniclastic and 4 siliciclastic samples from three Paleogene volcanic provinces - East Greenland, Faroe Islands, and Ethiopia. The volcaniclastic samples have highly variable helium porosities (average: 25.2%), but negligible total optical porosities (average: 1.9%) implying reduced reservoir potential. The samples have, however, highly variable air permeabilities (average: 11 mD) suggesting they could make tight reservoirs. The permeabilities are related to either early calcite cements or the devitrification of volcanic glass. Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure (MICP) data was collected for a subset of 33 samples that at leakage/breakthrough saturations could, under near-surface conditions, hold oil column heights of between 4 m and 1181 m (average: 240 m). The best seals consistently have zeolite contents of >20 vol.% due to their small pore throat radii. Conversely, the worst seals are dominated by smectite and a conspicuous absence of zeolite minerals. The zeolite-rich volcaniclastic rocks could, therefore, make good shallow seals. These features also apply to CO 2 storage, but questions remain about the reactivity of the volcanic material and secondary minerals with injected CO 2 , but also the adsorbent properties of zeolites, particularly clinoptilolite, in the presence of CO 2 . Supplementary material at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6986188
评估火山碎屑岩的储层特性和密封能力,以封存碳氢化合物,并将其应用于二氧化碳封存
由于火山碎屑岩的成分在埋藏成岩过程中具有不同程度的不稳定性和反应性,因此在油气勘探中通常被忽视为储层或封隔层。本研究调查了来自东格陵兰岛、法罗群岛和埃塞俄比亚三个古近纪火山区的 60 个火山碎屑岩样本和 4 个硅质碎屑岩样本的岩石学和岩石物理特征。火山碎屑岩样本的氦孔隙度变化很大(平均:25.2%),但总光学孔隙度几乎可以忽略不计(平均:1.9%),这意味着储层潜力降低。不过,这些样本的空气渗透率变化很大(平均:11 mD),表明它们可以成为致密储层。这些渗透率与早期方解石胶结或火山玻璃脱硝有关。收集了 33 个样本的汞注入毛细管压力(MICP)数据,在近地表条件下,这些样本在泄漏/突破饱和度时可保持 4 米至 1181 米(平均:240 米)的油柱高度。由于孔喉半径较小,最好的封隔层沸石含量始终大于 20 Vol.%。相反,最差的封存区则主要是闪长岩,明显缺乏沸石矿物。因此,富含沸石的火山碎屑岩可以很好地进行浅层封存。这些特征也适用于二氧化碳封存,但火山物质和次生矿物与注入的二氧化碳的反应性,以及沸石,特别是沸石在二氧化碳存在时的吸附特性仍存在问题。 补充材料见 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6986188
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信