Walter Ho, Klaudia Rafael, Yang Yang Xie, Naoki Suzuki, Jiaxi Hu, Keyue Yan
{"title":"Socioeconomic Factors and Perceptual Gaps in Quality Physical Education in Japan","authors":"Walter Ho, Klaudia Rafael, Yang Yang Xie, Naoki Suzuki, Jiaxi Hu, Keyue Yan","doi":"10.30819/iss.45-2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Japan initiated the latest curriculum reform in physical education (PE) to cultivate a desirable\nprogramme for students and improve quality physical education (QPE). This\nstudy invited 221 PE teachers (53.4% males and 45.3% females) from Tokyo and Hiroshima\nto demonstrate their perceptual understanding of the QPE situation in Japan. The\nvalidated 'Global Index of Quality Physical Education' questionnaire (Ho et al., 2021)\nwas used for data collection. The overall QPE score was 6.37 points out of 10. The lowestscored\ndimensions were Plans for Feasibility and Accessibility of PE (5.05) and Governmental\nInput for PE (5.37). There were no significant differences in the perspectives on\noverall QPE among genders and different years of experience between PE teachers and\nprofessionals. Significant differences in perspectives on QPE were evident between PE\nteachers and professionals working in Tokyo and Hiroshima and between job positions.\nThe discussion focuses on the marginal success of the situation in QPE in Japan, resulting\nfrom the socioeconomic barriers of a masculinity culture, gender stereotyping, and city\ndifferences in financial situation. The paper discusses the gaps and differences of QPE in\nJapan and the development implications of quality PE programmes.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":40315,"journal":{"name":"International Sports Studies","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Sports Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30819/iss.45-2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Japan initiated the latest curriculum reform in physical education (PE) to cultivate a desirable
programme for students and improve quality physical education (QPE). This
study invited 221 PE teachers (53.4% males and 45.3% females) from Tokyo and Hiroshima
to demonstrate their perceptual understanding of the QPE situation in Japan. The
validated 'Global Index of Quality Physical Education' questionnaire (Ho et al., 2021)
was used for data collection. The overall QPE score was 6.37 points out of 10. The lowestscored
dimensions were Plans for Feasibility and Accessibility of PE (5.05) and Governmental
Input for PE (5.37). There were no significant differences in the perspectives on
overall QPE among genders and different years of experience between PE teachers and
professionals. Significant differences in perspectives on QPE were evident between PE
teachers and professionals working in Tokyo and Hiroshima and between job positions.
The discussion focuses on the marginal success of the situation in QPE in Japan, resulting
from the socioeconomic barriers of a masculinity culture, gender stereotyping, and city
differences in financial situation. The paper discusses the gaps and differences of QPE in
Japan and the development implications of quality PE programmes.
期刊介绍:
International Sports Studies (ISS) is a scholarly journal in the field of physical education and sport with a unique focus. Its aim is to advance understanding and communication between members of the global community who share a professional, personal or scholarly interest in the state and development of physical education and sport around the world. International Sports Studies (ISS) is today without paradigmatic prejudice and reflects an eclectic approach to the task of understanding physical education and sport in the contemporary world. It asks only that its contributors can add to knowledge about international physical education and sport studies through studies involving comparisons between regional, national and international settings or by providing unique insights into specific national and local phenomena which contribute to an understanding that can be shared across as well as within national borders.