Sallekhana and the End-of-Life Option of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
Claire Maes
{"title":"Sallekhana and the End-of-Life Option of Voluntary Stopping of Eating and Drinking","authors":"Claire Maes","doi":"10.1558/rosa.27236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article brings sallekhana, the Jain practice of fasting to death, into conversation with the practice of ‘voluntary stopping of eating and drinking’ (VSED), an end-of-life option, available in various countries for competent adults, to hasten the end of life by consciously choosing to not eat and drink. From a medical and legal point of view sallekhana can be considered a form of VSED. Although differing in terms of intent and historical context, the two practices are similar insofar that they relate to capable and sound individuals who voluntarily forego food and water until death. Showing the critical similarity between VSED and sallekhana, I argue that the grounds put forward by major medical associations and legal societies to differentiate VSED from suicide are equally applicable to the case of sallekhana. I contend that the Jain fast needs to be disentangled from the concept of suicide based on the quality of intent, but also because the process is, in theory and for some time at least, reversible, supported by loved ones and members of the larger Jain community, and dependent on the individual’s continuous and prolonged will of renouncing food and water. I also show how medical and legal authorities defend an individual’s right to VSED based on the principles of self-determination, bodily integrity, self-ownership, and respect for persons. I put forward the view to take these ethical principles into account to legally protect a Jain’s right to take the vow of sallekhana.","PeriodicalId":38179,"journal":{"name":"Religions of South Asia","volume":"65 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religions of South Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.27236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article brings sallekhana, the Jain practice of fasting to death, into conversation with the practice of ‘voluntary stopping of eating and drinking’ (VSED), an end-of-life option, available in various countries for competent adults, to hasten the end of life by consciously choosing to not eat and drink. From a medical and legal point of view sallekhana can be considered a form of VSED. Although differing in terms of intent and historical context, the two practices are similar insofar that they relate to capable and sound individuals who voluntarily forego food and water until death. Showing the critical similarity between VSED and sallekhana, I argue that the grounds put forward by major medical associations and legal societies to differentiate VSED from suicide are equally applicable to the case of sallekhana. I contend that the Jain fast needs to be disentangled from the concept of suicide based on the quality of intent, but also because the process is, in theory and for some time at least, reversible, supported by loved ones and members of the larger Jain community, and dependent on the individual’s continuous and prolonged will of renouncing food and water. I also show how medical and legal authorities defend an individual’s right to VSED based on the principles of self-determination, bodily integrity, self-ownership, and respect for persons. I put forward the view to take these ethical principles into account to legally protect a Jain’s right to take the vow of sallekhana.
Sallekhana 和自愿停止饮食的临终选择
本文将耆那教的 "斋戒"(sallekhana)与 "自愿停止进食和饮水"(VSED)的做法结合起来,在许多国家,有能力的成年人可以通过有意识地选择不吃不喝来加速生命的终结。从医学和法律的角度来看,sallekhana 可被视为 VSED 的一种形式。虽然在意图和历史背景方面有所不同,但这两种做法在涉及有能力和健康的人自愿放弃进食和饮水直至死亡方面是相似的。为了说明耆那教斋戒与自杀之间的重要相似性,我认为主要医学协会和法律协会提出的将耆那教斋戒与自杀区分开来的理由同样适用于耆那教斋戒。我认为,耆那教的斋戒需要与自杀概念区分开来,这不仅是基于意图的质量,还因为从理论上讲,至少在一段时间内,斋戒过程是可逆的,得到了亲人和更大的耆那教社区成员的支持,并且取决于个人持续和长期放弃食物和水的意愿。我还展示了医学和法律权威如何根据自决、身体完整、自我所有权和尊重他人的原则捍卫个人的 VSED 权利。我提出了将这些伦理原则纳入考虑的观点,以从法律上保护耆那教徒发愿的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Religions of South Asia
Religions of South Asia Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信