The many faces of copd in real life: a longitudinal analysis of the novelty cohort

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Alvar Agustí, R. Hughes, Eleni Rapsomaki, B. Make, Ricardo del Olmo, Alberto Papi, David Price, Laura Benton, Stefan Franzén, Jørgen Vestbo, Hana Mullerova
{"title":"The many faces of copd in real life: a longitudinal analysis of the novelty cohort","authors":"Alvar Agustí, R. Hughes, Eleni Rapsomaki, B. Make, Ricardo del Olmo, Alberto Papi, David Price, Laura Benton, Stefan Franzén, Jørgen Vestbo, Hana Mullerova","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00895-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) requires the demonstration of non-fully reversible airflow limitation by spirometry in the appropriate clinical context. Yet, there are patients with symptoms and relevant exposures suggestive of COPD with either normal spirometry (pre-COPD) or Preserved Ratio but Impaired Spirometry (PRISm). Their prevalence, clinical characteristics and associated outcomes in a real-life setting are unclear.To investigate them, we studied 3183 patients diagnosed of COPD by their attending physician included in the NOVELTY study (NCT02760329), a global, 3-year, observational, real-life cohort that included patients recruited from both primary and specialist care clinics in 18 countries.We found that:(1)about a quarter of patients diagnosed with (and treated for) COPD in real-life did not fulfil the spirometric diagnostic criteria recommended by GOLD, and could be instead categorized as pre-COPD (13%) or PRISm (14%);(2)disease burden (symptoms and exacerbations) was highest in GOLD 3–4 patients (exacerbations per person-year [PPY]: 0.82) and lower but similar in those in GOLD 1–2, pre-COPD and PRISm (exacerbations PPY range: 0.27-0.43);(3)lung function decline was highest in pre-COPD and GOLD 1–2, and much less pronounced in PRISm and GOLD 3-4;(4); PRISm and pre-COPD were not stable diagnostic categories and change substantially over time; and,(5)all-cause mortality was highest in GOLD 3–4, lowest in pre-COPD, and intermediate and similar in GOLD 1–2 and PRISm.Patients diagnosed COPD in a real-life clinical setting present great diversity in symptom burden, progression, and survival, warranting medical attention.","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"7 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00895-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) requires the demonstration of non-fully reversible airflow limitation by spirometry in the appropriate clinical context. Yet, there are patients with symptoms and relevant exposures suggestive of COPD with either normal spirometry (pre-COPD) or Preserved Ratio but Impaired Spirometry (PRISm). Their prevalence, clinical characteristics and associated outcomes in a real-life setting are unclear.To investigate them, we studied 3183 patients diagnosed of COPD by their attending physician included in the NOVELTY study (NCT02760329), a global, 3-year, observational, real-life cohort that included patients recruited from both primary and specialist care clinics in 18 countries.We found that:(1)about a quarter of patients diagnosed with (and treated for) COPD in real-life did not fulfil the spirometric diagnostic criteria recommended by GOLD, and could be instead categorized as pre-COPD (13%) or PRISm (14%);(2)disease burden (symptoms and exacerbations) was highest in GOLD 3–4 patients (exacerbations per person-year [PPY]: 0.82) and lower but similar in those in GOLD 1–2, pre-COPD and PRISm (exacerbations PPY range: 0.27-0.43);(3)lung function decline was highest in pre-COPD and GOLD 1–2, and much less pronounced in PRISm and GOLD 3-4;(4); PRISm and pre-COPD were not stable diagnostic categories and change substantially over time; and,(5)all-cause mortality was highest in GOLD 3–4, lowest in pre-COPD, and intermediate and similar in GOLD 1–2 and PRISm.Patients diagnosed COPD in a real-life clinical setting present great diversity in symptom burden, progression, and survival, warranting medical attention.
现实生活中的多面 copd:对新奇队列的纵向分析
慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的诊断需要在适当的临床环境下通过肺活量测定证明气流受限是非完全可逆的。然而,有些患者有慢性阻塞性肺病的症状和相关暴露,但肺活量正常(慢性阻塞性肺病前期)或肺活量保留比率但受损(PRISm)。为了对这些患者进行调查,我们对 NOVELTY 研究(NCT02760329)中由主治医生诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病的 3183 名患者进行了研究,该研究是一项为期 3 年的全球性观察性现实生活队列,包括从 18 个国家的初级和专科诊所招募的患者。我们发现:(1)在现实生活中被诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病(并接受治疗)的患者中,约有四分之一不符合 GOLD 推荐的肺活量诊断标准,可被归类为慢性阻塞性肺病前期(13%)或 PRISm(14%);(2)GOLD 3-4 患者的疾病负担(症状和病情恶化)最高(每人年病情恶化次数 [PPY]:0.82),而GOLD 1-2、COPD前期和PRISm患者的疾病负担较低但相似(每人年加重次数范围:0.27-0.43);(3)COPD前期和GOLD 1-2患者的肺功能下降幅度最大,而PRISm和GOLD 3-4患者的肺功能下降幅度较小;(4)PRISm和COPD前期并非稳定的诊断类别,随着时间的推移会发生很大变化;(5)GOLD 3-4患者的全因死亡率最高,COPD前期最低,而GOLD 1-2和PRISm患者的全因死亡率居中且相似。在真实的临床环境中,被诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病的患者在症状负担、病情发展和存活率方面表现出很大的差异,值得引起医疗关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信