The Embodied One

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
Dhruv Raj Nagar
{"title":"The Embodied One","authors":"Dhruv Raj Nagar","doi":"10.1558/rosa.27233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advaita Vedanta is often approached as a philosophy of non-dualism. However, I show that approaching the tradition as a Sariraka Mamamsa, a hermeneutics of embodiment, better captures some of its core concerns. On this account, the Upanisads are primarily invested in clarifying the complex dynamics of human embodiment and the self’s immersion in various domains of materiality. To this extent, Advaita is well-placed to make unique interventions in the materialist turn in philosophy and religion, articulating a coherent discourse of embodied experience and pedagogy. Thus while the Vedantic project may be framed in terms of God or Brahman as its hermeneutic centre, it is the unfoldment of the nature of the saririn, the embodied, that drives the project at the first place. This requires discerning superimposed layers of identity (adhyasa), exfoliating each to arrive at the embodied one beneath the self’s embodying environs. This is not a negative process of withdrawing an ‘authentic’ self from its material or psychic entanglements, that is, desuperimposition (apavada). Rather, Advaitic method enjoins an embrace of the self’s immersion in its bodily environs, opening the phenomenal landscape of consciousness to hitherto unrecognized domains of phenomenal being submerged beneath conscious awareness. This is an expansive process that recalibrates one’s sense of self preparing it for more subtle forms of discernment in a graded phenomenal itinerary. I distinguish between two terms, adhyasa and adhyaropa, that, while mapping the same dynamics of embodiment, deploy it along different ends. Failure to appreciate this can obscure the precise work done by deliberate superimposition (adhyaropa) in Advaita.","PeriodicalId":38179,"journal":{"name":"Religions of South Asia","volume":"5 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religions of South Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.27233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advaita Vedanta is often approached as a philosophy of non-dualism. However, I show that approaching the tradition as a Sariraka Mamamsa, a hermeneutics of embodiment, better captures some of its core concerns. On this account, the Upanisads are primarily invested in clarifying the complex dynamics of human embodiment and the self’s immersion in various domains of materiality. To this extent, Advaita is well-placed to make unique interventions in the materialist turn in philosophy and religion, articulating a coherent discourse of embodied experience and pedagogy. Thus while the Vedantic project may be framed in terms of God or Brahman as its hermeneutic centre, it is the unfoldment of the nature of the saririn, the embodied, that drives the project at the first place. This requires discerning superimposed layers of identity (adhyasa), exfoliating each to arrive at the embodied one beneath the self’s embodying environs. This is not a negative process of withdrawing an ‘authentic’ self from its material or psychic entanglements, that is, desuperimposition (apavada). Rather, Advaitic method enjoins an embrace of the self’s immersion in its bodily environs, opening the phenomenal landscape of consciousness to hitherto unrecognized domains of phenomenal being submerged beneath conscious awareness. This is an expansive process that recalibrates one’s sense of self preparing it for more subtle forms of discernment in a graded phenomenal itinerary. I distinguish between two terms, adhyasa and adhyaropa, that, while mapping the same dynamics of embodiment, deploy it along different ends. Failure to appreciate this can obscure the precise work done by deliberate superimposition (adhyaropa) in Advaita.
化身者
人们通常将阿毗达吠檀多视为一种非二元论哲学。然而,我的研究表明,将这一传统视为 "萨里拉卡-玛玛玛萨"(Sariraka Mamamsa),即 "化身诠释学",能更好地捕捉到它的一些核心问题。从这个角度看,奥义书主要致力于阐明人类化身的复杂动态以及自我沉浸于各种物质领域的情况。从这个意义上说,阿婆达派有能力对哲学和宗教中的唯物主义转向进行独特的干预,阐明关于具身体验和教育学的连贯话语。因此,尽管吠檀多计划可能以上帝或婆罗门为诠释中心,但首先推动该计划的是 "萨里林"(即具身者)本质的展开。这就需要辨别叠加的身份层(adhyasa),剥离每一层,从而找到自我化身环境下的化身。这不是将 "真实 "的自我从物质或精神的纠缠中抽离出来的消极过程,即去叠加(apavada)。相反,临证法要求拥抱沉浸在身体环境中的自我,打开意识的现象景观,进入迄今为止尚未认识到的淹没在意识之下的现象领域。这是一个广阔的过程,它重新调整了一个人的自我意识,使其能够在分级的现象行程中以更微妙的形式进行辨别。我将adhyasa和adhyaropa这两个术语区分开来,虽然它们映射的是同样的体现动态,但却有着不同的目的。如果不理解这一点,就会掩盖阿待达中刻意叠加(adhyaropa)所做的精确工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Religions of South Asia
Religions of South Asia Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信