Population Density of Wild Animals and Their Conflict in Konasa_Pulasa Community Conserved Forest, Omo Valley, Southern Ethiopia

Q2 Environmental Science
Mesfin Matusal, A. Megaze, Taye Dobamo
{"title":"Population Density of Wild Animals and Their Conflict in Konasa_Pulasa Community Conserved Forest, Omo Valley, Southern Ethiopia","authors":"Mesfin Matusal, A. Megaze, Taye Dobamo","doi":"10.1155/2023/8437073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human-wildlife conflict presents an increasing challenge to conservation, particularly in densely populated parts of low-income countries. An investigation on wild animal population density and its conflict was carried out from December 2019 to May 2020 in the Konasa_Pulasa Community Conserved Forest, Omo Valley, Southern Ethiopia: implications for wildlife conservation. The distance sampling method was used to estimate the population status of wild animals in an area of 187.57 km2. Human-wild animal conflict was quantified using a questionnaire survey with 290 randomly selected household heads from five villages. In addition, focus group discussions were conducted to obtain additional information. The mean density of the Anubis baboons was 4.51 ± 0.76, that of the grivet monkeys was 3.24 ± 0.51, that of the porcupines was 0.89 ± 0.17, that of the spotted hyenas was 0.58 ± 0.15, and that of the black-backed jackals was 0.65 ± 0.12 individuals/km2. The result shows that crop damage and livestock predation were common problems in the study area. The most damaged cereal crops were maize (26.5%). The Anubis baboon was the most common crop raiding species (34.9%). An estimated average loss of different crop types was US$15.01 per year per household. Regarding livestock, sheep (36.2%) and poultry (44.3%) were the animals most attacked. The predator responsible for livestock depredation reported most frequently was the spotted hyena (35%), followed by the black-backed jackal (24%) and the leopard (16%), and it was responsible for the loss of 271 domestic animals with an estimated economic loss of US $24,395.92 in five villages. Guarding (47.4%) was the main means of mitigation methods. Most farmers’ (47.4%) attitude towards wild animal conservation was positive. The extent of the damage varied between villages and with the distance from the forest boundary. Local people close to the forest boundaries were highly vulnerable to wild animal conflict. Our results show that livestock predation and crop damage were common problems caused by Anubis baboon, verves monkeys, porcupines, spotted hyenas, and black-backed jackals. The increase in the population of wild animals and the proximity to the forest are the causes of HWC. Guarding is the dominant traditional method used to reduce HWC in the study area. Using effective methods to reduce livestock damage and loss to crops, including improved livestock husbandry, cultivating unpalatable crops near the forest and raising local community awareness could make local residents aware of conservation.","PeriodicalId":39113,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8437073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human-wildlife conflict presents an increasing challenge to conservation, particularly in densely populated parts of low-income countries. An investigation on wild animal population density and its conflict was carried out from December 2019 to May 2020 in the Konasa_Pulasa Community Conserved Forest, Omo Valley, Southern Ethiopia: implications for wildlife conservation. The distance sampling method was used to estimate the population status of wild animals in an area of 187.57 km2. Human-wild animal conflict was quantified using a questionnaire survey with 290 randomly selected household heads from five villages. In addition, focus group discussions were conducted to obtain additional information. The mean density of the Anubis baboons was 4.51 ± 0.76, that of the grivet monkeys was 3.24 ± 0.51, that of the porcupines was 0.89 ± 0.17, that of the spotted hyenas was 0.58 ± 0.15, and that of the black-backed jackals was 0.65 ± 0.12 individuals/km2. The result shows that crop damage and livestock predation were common problems in the study area. The most damaged cereal crops were maize (26.5%). The Anubis baboon was the most common crop raiding species (34.9%). An estimated average loss of different crop types was US$15.01 per year per household. Regarding livestock, sheep (36.2%) and poultry (44.3%) were the animals most attacked. The predator responsible for livestock depredation reported most frequently was the spotted hyena (35%), followed by the black-backed jackal (24%) and the leopard (16%), and it was responsible for the loss of 271 domestic animals with an estimated economic loss of US $24,395.92 in five villages. Guarding (47.4%) was the main means of mitigation methods. Most farmers’ (47.4%) attitude towards wild animal conservation was positive. The extent of the damage varied between villages and with the distance from the forest boundary. Local people close to the forest boundaries were highly vulnerable to wild animal conflict. Our results show that livestock predation and crop damage were common problems caused by Anubis baboon, verves monkeys, porcupines, spotted hyenas, and black-backed jackals. The increase in the population of wild animals and the proximity to the forest are the causes of HWC. Guarding is the dominant traditional method used to reduce HWC in the study area. Using effective methods to reduce livestock damage and loss to crops, including improved livestock husbandry, cultivating unpalatable crops near the forest and raising local community awareness could make local residents aware of conservation.
埃塞俄比亚南部奥莫河谷 Konasa_Pulasa 社区保护林中野生动物的种群密度及其冲突
人类与野生动物的冲突给保护工作带来了越来越大的挑战,尤其是在低收入国家人口稠密的地区。2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 5 月,在埃塞俄比亚南部奥莫河谷的 Konasa_Pulasa 社区保护林开展了一项关于野生动物种群密度及其冲突的调查:对野生动物保护的影响。采用距离取样法估算了 187.57 平方公里区域内野生动物的种群状况。通过对五个村庄随机抽取的 290 位户主进行问卷调查,量化了人与野生动物之间的冲突。此外,还进行了焦点小组讨论,以获取更多信息。阿努比斯狒狒的平均密度为 4.51 ± 0.76 只/平方公里,叼猴的平均密度为 3.24 ± 0.51 只/平方公里,豪猪的平均密度为 0.89 ± 0.17 只/平方公里,斑鬣狗的平均密度为 0.58 ± 0.15 只/平方公里,黑背豺的平均密度为 0.65 ± 0.12 只/平方公里。结果表明,作物损害和牲畜捕食是研究地区的常见问题。受损最严重的谷类作物是玉米(26.5%)。阿努比斯狒狒是最常见的掠夺农作物的物种(34.9%)。据估计,不同类型作物的平均损失为每户每年 15.01 美元。在牲畜方面,羊(36.2%)和家禽(44.3%)是受攻击最多的动物。斑鬣狗(35%)、黑背豺(24%)和豹(16%)是最常见的掠食者,它们造成了五个村庄 271 头家畜的损失,估计经济损失为 24,395.92 美元。守护(47.4%)是主要的缓解方法。大多数农民(47.4%)对野生动物保护持积极态度。不同村庄的受损程度不同,与森林边界的距离也不同。靠近森林边界的当地人极易受到野生动物冲突的影响。我们的研究结果表明,家畜捕食和农作物损害是阿努比斯狒狒、疣猴、豪猪、斑鬣狗和黑背豺造成的常见问题。野生动物数量的增加和靠近森林是造成 HWC 的原因。在研究地区,看护是减少 HWC 的主要传统方法。采用有效的方法减少牲畜对农作物的损害和损失,包括改进畜牧业、在森林附近种植难吃的农作物以及提高当地社区的认识,可以使当地居民提高保护意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Ecology
International Journal of Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
15 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信