Deceptively Stable? How the Stability of Aggregate Abortion Attitudes Conceals Partisan Induced Shifts

IF 1.5 2区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Melissa Deckman, Laurel Elder, S. Greene, M. Lizotte
{"title":"Deceptively Stable? How the Stability of Aggregate Abortion Attitudes Conceals Partisan Induced Shifts","authors":"Melissa Deckman, Laurel Elder, S. Greene, M. Lizotte","doi":"10.1177/10659129231222883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2022 Dobbs decision, striking down constitutional protection for abortion, sent shockwaves through the American political system. For the 50 years prior, however, public opinion on abortion was distinctive for its stability, with almost the same percent of Americans supporting legal abortion in the twenty-first century as in the 1970s. This stasis persisted during a period of dramatic change in the political landscape. We employ General Social Survey (GSS) data to explore the ways that partisanship, as well as demographic and attitude changes among key groups, have contributed to underlying shifts in abortion attitudes and, on an aggregate level, the appearance of stability. We show that demographic changes combined with meaningful attitude change balance each other out leading to deceptive stability. We also show the growing power of partisanship as a predictor of abortion attitudes for both Democrats and Republicans, especially Republican women, who have become more opposed to legal abortion than Republican men. Our findings provide a baseline for understanding abortion attitudes in post-Roe America and insights as to where continuity and change can be expected.","PeriodicalId":51366,"journal":{"name":"Political Research Quarterly","volume":"36 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231222883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2022 Dobbs decision, striking down constitutional protection for abortion, sent shockwaves through the American political system. For the 50 years prior, however, public opinion on abortion was distinctive for its stability, with almost the same percent of Americans supporting legal abortion in the twenty-first century as in the 1970s. This stasis persisted during a period of dramatic change in the political landscape. We employ General Social Survey (GSS) data to explore the ways that partisanship, as well as demographic and attitude changes among key groups, have contributed to underlying shifts in abortion attitudes and, on an aggregate level, the appearance of stability. We show that demographic changes combined with meaningful attitude change balance each other out leading to deceptive stability. We also show the growing power of partisanship as a predictor of abortion attitudes for both Democrats and Republicans, especially Republican women, who have become more opposed to legal abortion than Republican men. Our findings provide a baseline for understanding abortion attitudes in post-Roe America and insights as to where continuity and change can be expected.
具有欺骗性的稳定?总体堕胎态度的稳定性如何掩盖党派诱导的转变
2022 年多布斯案的判决推翻了宪法对堕胎的保护,在美国政治体系中引起了震动。然而,在此之前的 50 年中,公众对堕胎的看法一直保持稳定,21 世纪支持合法堕胎的美国人比例几乎与 20 世纪 70 年代相同。在政治格局发生巨大变化的时期,这种稳定性依然存在。我们利用一般社会调查(GSS)数据,探讨了党派之争以及主要群体的人口和态度变化如何导致堕胎态度的根本转变,以及在总体上如何导致表面上的稳定。我们的研究表明,人口变化与有意义的态度变化相互平衡,从而形成了具有欺骗性的稳定性。我们还表明,党派作为民主党和共和党人堕胎态度的预测因素,其作用越来越大,尤其是共和党女性,她们比共和党男性更反对合法堕胎。我们的研究结果为了解《罗伊法案》颁布后美国的堕胎态度提供了一个基准,并为预期连续性和变化提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Research Quarterly
Political Research Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Political Research Quarterly (PRQ) is the official journal of the Western Political Science Association. PRQ seeks to publish scholarly research of exceptionally high merit that makes notable contributions in any subfield of political science. The editors especially encourage submissions that employ a mixture of theoretical approaches or multiple methodologies to address major political problems or puzzles at a local, national, or global level. Collections of articles on a common theme or debate, to be published as short symposia, are welcome as well as individual submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信