Evaluating Metabarcoding Markers for Identifying Zooplankton and Ichthyoplankton Communities to Species in the Salish Sea: Morphological Comparisons and Rare, Threatened or Invasive Species

DNA Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.3390/dna4010001
Carol A. Stepien, Haila K. Schultz, Sean M. McAllister, Emily L. Norton, J. Keister
{"title":"Evaluating Metabarcoding Markers for Identifying Zooplankton and Ichthyoplankton Communities to Species in the Salish Sea: Morphological Comparisons and Rare, Threatened or Invasive Species","authors":"Carol A. Stepien, Haila K. Schultz, Sean M. McAllister, Emily L. Norton, J. Keister","doi":"10.3390/dna4010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zooplankton and ichthyoplankton community assessments depend on species diagnostics, yet morphological identifications are time-consuming, require taxonomic expertise, and are hampered by a lack of diagnostic characters, particularly for larval stages. Metabarcoding can identify multiple species in communities from short DNA sequences in comparison to reference databases. To evaluate species resolution across phylogenetic groups and food webs of zooplankton and ichthyoplankton, we compare five metabarcode mitochondrial (mt)DNA markers from gene regions of (a) cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, (b) cytochrome b, (c) 16S ribosomal RNA, and (d) 12S ribosomal RNA for DNA extracted from net tows in the Northeastern Pacific Ocean’s Salish Sea across seven sites and two seasons. Species resolved by metabarcoding are compared to invertebrate morphological identifications and biomass estimates. Results indicate that species resolution for different zooplankton and ichthyoplankton taxa can markedly vary among gene regions and markers in comparison to morphological identifications. Thus, researchers seeking “universal” metabarcoding should take caution that several markers and gene regions likely will be needed; all will miss some taxa and yield incomplete overlap. Species resolution requires careful attention to taxon marker selection and coverage in reference sequence repositories. In summary, combined multi-marker metabarcoding and morphological approaches improve broadscale zooplankton diagnostics.","PeriodicalId":72835,"journal":{"name":"DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dna4010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zooplankton and ichthyoplankton community assessments depend on species diagnostics, yet morphological identifications are time-consuming, require taxonomic expertise, and are hampered by a lack of diagnostic characters, particularly for larval stages. Metabarcoding can identify multiple species in communities from short DNA sequences in comparison to reference databases. To evaluate species resolution across phylogenetic groups and food webs of zooplankton and ichthyoplankton, we compare five metabarcode mitochondrial (mt)DNA markers from gene regions of (a) cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, (b) cytochrome b, (c) 16S ribosomal RNA, and (d) 12S ribosomal RNA for DNA extracted from net tows in the Northeastern Pacific Ocean’s Salish Sea across seven sites and two seasons. Species resolved by metabarcoding are compared to invertebrate morphological identifications and biomass estimates. Results indicate that species resolution for different zooplankton and ichthyoplankton taxa can markedly vary among gene regions and markers in comparison to morphological identifications. Thus, researchers seeking “universal” metabarcoding should take caution that several markers and gene regions likely will be needed; all will miss some taxa and yield incomplete overlap. Species resolution requires careful attention to taxon marker selection and coverage in reference sequence repositories. In summary, combined multi-marker metabarcoding and morphological approaches improve broadscale zooplankton diagnostics.
评估用于识别咸海浮游动物和浮游鱼类群落物种的元标码标记:形态比较和稀有、濒危或入侵物种
浮游动物和鱼类浮游生物群落评估依赖于物种诊断,但形态学鉴定耗时长,需要分类学专业知识,并且因缺乏诊断特征(尤其是幼虫阶段)而受到阻碍。与参考数据库相比,元条码可通过短 DNA 序列识别群落中的多个物种。为了评估浮游动物和鱼类浮游生物在系统发生群和食物网中的物种分辨率,我们比较了从东北太平洋咸海七个地点和两个季节的网拖中提取的 DNA 的五个元条码线粒体(mt)DNA 标记:(a) 细胞色素 c 氧化酶亚单位 I、(b) 细胞色素 b、(c) 16S 核糖体 RNA 和 (d) 12S 核糖体 RNA。通过元条码解析的物种与无脊椎动物形态鉴定和生物量估计进行了比较。结果表明,与形态鉴定相比,不同浮游动物和鱼类类群的物种分辨率在基因区域和标记之间会有明显差异。因此,寻求 "通用 "代谢编码的研究人员应注意,可能需要多个标记物和基因区域;所有标记物和基因区域都会遗漏某些类群,并产生不完全的重叠。物种解析需要仔细关注分类群标记的选择和参考序列库的覆盖范围。总之,将多标记元标码和形态学方法结合起来可提高浮游动物的广泛诊断能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DNA
DNA
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信