Optimizing the methodology of human sleep and memory research

IF 16.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Dezső Németh, Emilie Gerbier, Jan Born, Timothy Rickard, Susanne Diekelmann, Stuart Fogel, Lisa Genzel, Alexander Prehn-Kristensen, Jessica Payne, Martin Dresler, Peter Simor, Stephanie Mazza, Kerstin Hoedlmoser, Perrine Ruby, Rebecca M. C. Spencer, Genevieve Albouy, Teodóra Vékony, Manuel Schabus, Karolina Janacsek
{"title":"Optimizing the methodology of human sleep and memory research","authors":"Dezső Németh, Emilie Gerbier, Jan Born, Timothy Rickard, Susanne Diekelmann, Stuart Fogel, Lisa Genzel, Alexander Prehn-Kristensen, Jessica Payne, Martin Dresler, Peter Simor, Stephanie Mazza, Kerstin Hoedlmoser, Perrine Ruby, Rebecca M. C. Spencer, Genevieve Albouy, Teodóra Vékony, Manuel Schabus, Karolina Janacsek","doi":"10.1038/s44159-023-00262-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the complex relationship between sleep and memory consolidation is a major challenge in cognitive neuroscience and psychology. Many studies suggest that sleep triggers off-line memory processes, resulting in less forgetting of declarative memory and performance stabilization in non-declarative memory. However, the role of sleep in human memory consolidation is still under considerable debate, and numerous contradictory and non-replicable findings have been reported. Methodological issues related to experimental designs, task characteristics and measurements, and data-analysis practices all influence the effects that are observed and their interpretation. In this Perspective, we review methodological issues in sleep and memory studies and suggest constructive solutions to address them. We believe that implementing these solutions in future sleep and memory research will substantially advance the field and improve understanding of the specific role of sleep in memory consolidation. Studies of the effect of sleep on learning and memory sometimes reveal conflicting or unreliable results. In this Perspective, Nemeth and colleagues review methodological challenges and make recommendations for improving the reliability of research in this field.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-023-00262-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the complex relationship between sleep and memory consolidation is a major challenge in cognitive neuroscience and psychology. Many studies suggest that sleep triggers off-line memory processes, resulting in less forgetting of declarative memory and performance stabilization in non-declarative memory. However, the role of sleep in human memory consolidation is still under considerable debate, and numerous contradictory and non-replicable findings have been reported. Methodological issues related to experimental designs, task characteristics and measurements, and data-analysis practices all influence the effects that are observed and their interpretation. In this Perspective, we review methodological issues in sleep and memory studies and suggest constructive solutions to address them. We believe that implementing these solutions in future sleep and memory research will substantially advance the field and improve understanding of the specific role of sleep in memory consolidation. Studies of the effect of sleep on learning and memory sometimes reveal conflicting or unreliable results. In this Perspective, Nemeth and colleagues review methodological challenges and make recommendations for improving the reliability of research in this field.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

优化人类睡眠和记忆研究方法
了解睡眠与记忆巩固之间的复杂关系是认知神经科学和心理学的一大挑战。许多研究表明,睡眠会触发离线记忆过程,从而减少陈述性记忆的遗忘,稳定非陈述性记忆的表现。然而,关于睡眠在人类记忆巩固过程中的作用仍存在相当大的争议,并且有许多相互矛盾和不可复制的研究结果被报道出来。与实验设计、任务特征和测量方法以及数据分析方法有关的方法学问题都会影响所观察到的效果及其解释。在本《视角》中,我们回顾了睡眠和记忆研究中的方法问题,并提出了解决这些问题的建设性方案。我们相信,在未来的睡眠与记忆研究中实施这些解决方案将大大推动该领域的发展,并提高人们对睡眠在记忆巩固中的特定作用的理解。有关睡眠对学习和记忆影响的研究有时会得出相互矛盾或不可靠的结果。在本《视角》中,内梅斯及其同事回顾了方法学方面的挑战,并就如何提高该领域研究的可靠性提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信