The effect of systematic and unsystematic determinants on loan (financing) to deposit ratio in Indonesian banking

M. I. Irfany, Muhammad Fikra Yafi Ulhaqqi
{"title":"The effect of systematic and unsystematic determinants on loan (financing) to deposit ratio in Indonesian banking","authors":"M. I. Irfany, Muhammad Fikra Yafi Ulhaqqi","doi":"10.35912/amor.v5i1.1657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study compares the determinants of liquidity of Islamic Banks (IBs) and Conventional Banks (CBs) based on the loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) and financing-to-deposit ratio (FDR) between 2016 and 2020.\nResearch Methodology: The data analysis technique used was panel data regression.\nResults: The results show Economic growth has a positive effect on banking liquidity risk, while non-performing loans (financing) have a negative effect on banking liquidity risk.\nLimitations: The frame time in this research was 2016-2020 which, before Bank Syariah Mandiri, Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) Syariah, and Bank Negara Indonesia (BNI) Syariah merged into Bank Syariah Indonesia.\nContribution: This study can be used as a reference for preparing or perfecting regulations that can be bolder in expanding credit (financing). Commercial banks are expected to be able to manage liquidity so that the liquidity ratio is not less than or exceeds the tolerance limit, especially for CBs, and are used as evaluation material for the performance of IBs, especially CBs.\nNovelty: Several previous studies conducted separate analyses of the determinants of LDR and FDR in one type of commercial bank and showed contradictory results. This research did not conduct separate analyses in one type of bank but combined the determinants so that they could cause liquidity risk by measuring LDR on BUK and FDR on BUS to discuss these conflicting findings.","PeriodicalId":491922,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Management and Organization Research","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Management and Organization Research","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v5i1.1657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares the determinants of liquidity of Islamic Banks (IBs) and Conventional Banks (CBs) based on the loan-to-deposit ratio (LDR) and financing-to-deposit ratio (FDR) between 2016 and 2020. Research Methodology: The data analysis technique used was panel data regression. Results: The results show Economic growth has a positive effect on banking liquidity risk, while non-performing loans (financing) have a negative effect on banking liquidity risk. Limitations: The frame time in this research was 2016-2020 which, before Bank Syariah Mandiri, Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) Syariah, and Bank Negara Indonesia (BNI) Syariah merged into Bank Syariah Indonesia. Contribution: This study can be used as a reference for preparing or perfecting regulations that can be bolder in expanding credit (financing). Commercial banks are expected to be able to manage liquidity so that the liquidity ratio is not less than or exceeds the tolerance limit, especially for CBs, and are used as evaluation material for the performance of IBs, especially CBs. Novelty: Several previous studies conducted separate analyses of the determinants of LDR and FDR in one type of commercial bank and showed contradictory results. This research did not conduct separate analyses in one type of bank but combined the determinants so that they could cause liquidity risk by measuring LDR on BUK and FDR on BUS to discuss these conflicting findings.
印度尼西亚银行业系统性和非系统性决定因素对贷款(融资)与存款比率的影响
目的:本研究基于贷存比(LDR)和融资存比(FDR),比较了2016年至2020年间伊斯兰银行(IBs)和传统银行(CBs)流动性的决定因素:采用的数据分析技术是面板数据回归:结果显示,经济增长对银行业流动性风险有正向影响,而不良贷款(融资)对银行业流动性风险有负向影响:本研究的框架时间为 2016-2020 年,即印尼曼迪里伊斯兰银行、印尼人民银行(BRI)伊斯兰银行和印尼国家银行(BNI)伊斯兰银行合并为印尼伊斯兰银行之前:本研究可为制定或完善法规提供参考,从而更大胆地扩大信贷(融资)。商业银行应能够管理流动性,使流动性比率不低于或超过容许限度,尤其是对商业银行而言,流动性比率可作为综合银行(尤其是商业银行)业绩的评估材料。新颖性:之前的几项研究分别分析了某一类商业银行的流动性比率和金融流动性比率的决定因素,并得出了相互矛盾的结果。本研究没有在一类银行中进行单独分析,而是通过测量 BUK 的 LDR 和 BUS 的 FDR 来讨论这些相互矛盾的结果,从而将决定因素结合起来,使其能够导致流动性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信