Analysis of global research trends on FinTech: a bibliometric study

Faraj Salman Alfawareh, Mahmoud Al-Kofahi
{"title":"Analysis of global research trends on FinTech: a bibliometric study","authors":"Faraj Salman Alfawareh, Mahmoud Al-Kofahi","doi":"10.1108/jide-06-2023-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe key aim of this study is to highlight current financial technology (FinTech) trends by conducting a bibliometric review of literature derived from the Scopus database.Design/methodology/approach A bibliometric analysis was conducted on articles gathered from the Scopus database. Microsoft Excel was used to perform the frequency analysis, VOSviewer for visualising the data, and Harzing’s Publish or Perish for the metrics citation.Findings According to this investigation, research into FinTech has been consistently increasing since 2008. The results indicate that the most active publisher of FinTech literature is Bina Nusantara University in Indonesia. In terms of country of publication, China is identified as the most active. The most cited author is Buckley, R.P., with Rabbani, M.R., having the most publications. It was also identified that FinTech researches come under three primary domains namely business management, computer science and economics.Research limitations/implications The primary limitation of this current study is that it only relied on one data source, i.e. Scopus. Implications wise, researchers and practitioners can gain a deeper understanding of FinTech from this study, which also describes the trend in related publications on the concept. Future studies could significantly benefit from the findings of the present paper.Practical implications The outcomes of this study can assist researchers in better comprehending and summarising the key drivers of FinTech. In addition, the findings can help new researchers identify the starting point for their research on FinTech.Originality/value As far as the authors are aware, this is the first study that reviews FinTech publications derived from Scopus from 2008 to 2022. Hence, it is a pioneering study into FinTech bibliometric analysis, providing an understanding of the structural knowledge by reviewing the timeline of academic progression in FinTech.","PeriodicalId":345526,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internet and Digital Economics","volume":"47 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internet and Digital Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jide-06-2023-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe key aim of this study is to highlight current financial technology (FinTech) trends by conducting a bibliometric review of literature derived from the Scopus database.Design/methodology/approach A bibliometric analysis was conducted on articles gathered from the Scopus database. Microsoft Excel was used to perform the frequency analysis, VOSviewer for visualising the data, and Harzing’s Publish or Perish for the metrics citation.Findings According to this investigation, research into FinTech has been consistently increasing since 2008. The results indicate that the most active publisher of FinTech literature is Bina Nusantara University in Indonesia. In terms of country of publication, China is identified as the most active. The most cited author is Buckley, R.P., with Rabbani, M.R., having the most publications. It was also identified that FinTech researches come under three primary domains namely business management, computer science and economics.Research limitations/implications The primary limitation of this current study is that it only relied on one data source, i.e. Scopus. Implications wise, researchers and practitioners can gain a deeper understanding of FinTech from this study, which also describes the trend in related publications on the concept. Future studies could significantly benefit from the findings of the present paper.Practical implications The outcomes of this study can assist researchers in better comprehending and summarising the key drivers of FinTech. In addition, the findings can help new researchers identify the starting point for their research on FinTech.Originality/value As far as the authors are aware, this is the first study that reviews FinTech publications derived from Scopus from 2008 to 2022. Hence, it is a pioneering study into FinTech bibliometric analysis, providing an understanding of the structural knowledge by reviewing the timeline of academic progression in FinTech.
全球金融科技研究趋势分析:文献计量学研究
目的 本研究的主要目的是通过对 Scopus 数据库中的文献进行文献计量分析,突出当前金融科技(FinTech)的发展趋势。使用 Microsoft Excel 进行频率分析,使用 VOSviewer 进行数据可视化,使用 Harzing's Publish or Perish 进行指标引用。结果表明,金融科技文献最活跃的出版商是印度尼西亚的 Bina Nusantara 大学。从出版国家来看,中国是最活跃的国家。被引用最多的作者是巴克利(Buckley, R.P.),而拉巴尼(Rabbani, M.R.)发表的论文最多。研究的局限性/启示 本研究的主要局限性在于它只依赖于一个数据源,即 Scopus。从意义上讲,研究人员和从业人员可以从本研究中加深对金融科技的理解,本研究还描述了与这一概念相关的出版物的发展趋势。本研究的成果有助于研究人员更好地理解和总结金融科技的关键驱动因素。此外,研究结果还有助于新研究人员确定其金融科技研究的起点。原创性/价值 据作者所知,这是第一份回顾 2008 年至 2022 年 Scopus 中金融科技出版物的研究报告。因此,这是一项关于金融科技文献计量分析的开创性研究,通过回顾金融科技学术发展的时间轴,提供了对知识结构的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信