Functional view and technological progress of a sociotechnical system: illustrated with an interventionist state

IF 2.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Lakshminarayana Kompella
{"title":"Functional view and technological progress of a sociotechnical system: illustrated with an interventionist state","authors":"Lakshminarayana Kompella","doi":"10.1108/ijesm-02-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nOrganizations use innovations and respond to external pressures, creating a transition to the sociotechnical system. In their transitions, they interact with the environment and undergo adaptation-selection. The extant literature used a multilevel perspective (MLP) with a structural view and examined dynamics and transitions (phenomena) in a noninterventionistic setting. This study aims to examine the dynamics and phenomena with a microstructural or functional view and expand the MLP; this paper uses neo-institutionalism and human values as part of the functional view. Moreover, when the authors examine the phenomena in an interventionistic setting, they can obtain certain unique dynamics and their influence on the phenomena.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors need to examine the phenomena in its setting, so this paper selected a case study, Indian electricity generation. For diverse heuristic and analytic views, it selected two Indian states.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings from the functional view showed that organizations exhibit certain traits of neo-institutionalism and human values, which mediate their responses (behavior) to external pressures. Additionally, due to the interventionist state, their dynamics use shaping instead of selection logic for innovations, which decides the transition pathway selection (technology adoption). It further decided the extent to which innovations cumulate as stable designs. As a result, the responses and the transition provide benefits in the short term while invariably failing in the long term.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nBy selecting cases with higher investments in renewable energies and combustible fuels, the authors can expand the functional view to include user typologies such as producers, intermediaries and citizen groups and obtain further insights into transitions.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study highlights the generation dynamics specific to Indian electricity generation and its transition pathways. The study’s outcome provides insights to researchers and practitioners in formulating policy changes and transforming electricity generation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study uses a functional view comprising neo-institutionalism and human values and expands the sociotechnical transition theory. In addition, selecting an interventionist setting provided insights into dynamics specific to organizational behavior and associated services. Finally, the obtained insights offer suggestions for technology development to better manage transitions with adaptation-selection.\n","PeriodicalId":46430,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Sector Management","volume":"53 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Sector Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijesm-02-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Organizations use innovations and respond to external pressures, creating a transition to the sociotechnical system. In their transitions, they interact with the environment and undergo adaptation-selection. The extant literature used a multilevel perspective (MLP) with a structural view and examined dynamics and transitions (phenomena) in a noninterventionistic setting. This study aims to examine the dynamics and phenomena with a microstructural or functional view and expand the MLP; this paper uses neo-institutionalism and human values as part of the functional view. Moreover, when the authors examine the phenomena in an interventionistic setting, they can obtain certain unique dynamics and their influence on the phenomena. Design/methodology/approach The authors need to examine the phenomena in its setting, so this paper selected a case study, Indian electricity generation. For diverse heuristic and analytic views, it selected two Indian states. Findings The findings from the functional view showed that organizations exhibit certain traits of neo-institutionalism and human values, which mediate their responses (behavior) to external pressures. Additionally, due to the interventionist state, their dynamics use shaping instead of selection logic for innovations, which decides the transition pathway selection (technology adoption). It further decided the extent to which innovations cumulate as stable designs. As a result, the responses and the transition provide benefits in the short term while invariably failing in the long term. Research limitations/implications By selecting cases with higher investments in renewable energies and combustible fuels, the authors can expand the functional view to include user typologies such as producers, intermediaries and citizen groups and obtain further insights into transitions. Practical implications The study highlights the generation dynamics specific to Indian electricity generation and its transition pathways. The study’s outcome provides insights to researchers and practitioners in formulating policy changes and transforming electricity generation. Originality/value The study uses a functional view comprising neo-institutionalism and human values and expands the sociotechnical transition theory. In addition, selecting an interventionist setting provided insights into dynamics specific to organizational behavior and associated services. Finally, the obtained insights offer suggestions for technology development to better manage transitions with adaptation-selection.
社会技术系统的功能视角和技术进步:以干预主义国家为例
目的:各组织利用创新并对外部压力做出反应,形成向社会技术系统的过渡。在过渡过程中,组织与环境相互作用,并进行适应性选择。现有文献采用多层次视角(MLP)和结构观点,研究了非干预环境下的动态和过渡(现象)。本研究旨在从微观结构或功能角度研究动态和现象,并扩展多层次视角;本文将新制度主义和人类价值观作为功能视角的一部分。此外,当作者在干预主义背景下研究现象时,可以获得某些独特的动态及其对现象的影响。设计/方法/途径作者需要在其背景下研究现象,因此本文选择了印度发电作为案例研究。研究结果功能视角的研究结果表明,组织表现出新制度主义和人类价值观的某些特征,这些特征是组织对外部压力做出反应(行为)的中介。此外,由于处于干预状态,它们的创新动态使用的是塑造逻辑而非选择逻辑,这决定了过渡途径的选择(技术采用)。这进一步决定了创新在多大程度上累积为稳定的设计。研究的局限性/意义通过选择可再生能源和可燃燃料投资较高的案例,作者可以扩展功能视角,将生产商、中间商和公民团体等用户类型纳入其中,并进一步深入了解过渡问题。研究成果为研究人员和从业人员制定政策变革和发电转型提供了启示。原创性/价值该研究采用了包含新制度主义和人类价值观的功能视角,拓展了社会技术转型理论。此外,选择干预性环境有助于深入了解组织行为和相关服务的具体动态。最后,所获得的见解为技术开发提供了建议,以更好地管理适应-选择过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
22.60%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Energy Sector Management aims to facilitate dissemination of research on issues relating to supply management (covering the entire supply chain of resource finding, extraction, production, treatment, conversion, transportation, distribution and retail supply), demand and usage management, waste management, customer and other stakeholder management, and solutions thereto. The journal covers all forms of energy (non-renewable and renewable), forms of supply (centralised or decentralised), ownership patterns (public or private, cooperative, joint, or any other), market structures (formal, informal, integrated, disintegrated, national, international, local, etc.) and degress of commoditisation (e.g. internationally traded, regionally traded, non-traded, etc.). The journal aims to cover a wide range of subjects relevant to the management of the energy sector, including but not limited to: Management of scarce resources (economic, financial, human and natural), projects, activities and concerns (e.g. regulatory, social and environmental aspects), technologies and knowledge Business strategy, policy and planning as well as decision support systems for energy sector management Business organisation, structure and environment, and changes thereto Globalisation and multi-cultural management Management of innovation, change and transition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信