Antihypertensive prescribing patterns in non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease: Findings from the Salford Kidney Study

R. Chinnadurai, Henry H L Wu, Jones Abuomar, Sharmilee Rengarajan, D. New, D. Green, Philip A Kalra
{"title":"Antihypertensive prescribing patterns in non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease: Findings from the Salford Kidney Study","authors":"R. Chinnadurai, Henry H L Wu, Jones Abuomar, Sharmilee Rengarajan, D. New, D. Green, Philip A Kalra","doi":"10.5527/wjn.v12.i5.168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Hypertension is commonly observed in patients living with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Finding an optimal treatment regime remains challenging due to the complex bidirectional cause-and-effect relationship between hypertension and CKD. There remains variability in antihypertensive treatment practices.\n AIM\n To antihypertensive prescribing patterns amongst CKD patients.\n METHODS\n The Salford Kidney Study is an ongoing prospective study that has been recruiting CKD patients since 2002. All patients are followed up annually, and their medical records including the list of medications are updated until they reach study endpoints [starting on renal replacement therapy or reaching estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) expressed as mL/min/1.73 m2 ≤ 10 mL/min/1.73m2, or the last follow-up date, or data lock on December 31, 2021, or death]. Data on antihypertensive prescription practices in correspondence to baseline eGFR, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, primary CKD aetiology, and cardiovascular disease were evaluated. Associations between patients who were prescribed three or more antihypertensive agents and their clinical outcomes were studied by Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated differences in survival probabilities.\n RESULTS\n Three thousand two hundred and thirty non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients with data collected between October 2002 and December 2019 were included. The median age was 65 years. A greater proportion of patients were taking three or more antihypertensive agents with advancing CKD stages (53% of eGFR ≤ 15 mL/min/1.73m2 vs 26% of eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2, P < 0.001). An increased number of patients receiving more classes of antihypertensive agents was observed as the urine albumin-creatinine ratio category increased (category A3: 62% vs category A1: 40%, P < 0.001), with the upward trends particularly noticeable in the number of individuals prescribed renin angiotensin system blockers. The prescription of three or more antihypertensive agents was associated with all-cause mortality, independent of blood pressure control (hazard ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.27, P = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier analysis illustrated significant differences in survival outcomes between patients with three or more and those with less than three antihypertensive agents prescribed (log-rank, P < 0.001).\n CONCLUSION\n Antihypertensive prescribing patterns in the Salford Kidney Study based on CKD stage were consistent with expectations from the current United Kingdom National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline algorithm. Outcomes were poorer in patients with poor blood pressure control despite being on multiple antihypertensive agents. Continued research is required to bridge remaining variations in hypertension treatment practices worldwide.","PeriodicalId":23745,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v12.i5.168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Hypertension is commonly observed in patients living with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Finding an optimal treatment regime remains challenging due to the complex bidirectional cause-and-effect relationship between hypertension and CKD. There remains variability in antihypertensive treatment practices. AIM To antihypertensive prescribing patterns amongst CKD patients. METHODS The Salford Kidney Study is an ongoing prospective study that has been recruiting CKD patients since 2002. All patients are followed up annually, and their medical records including the list of medications are updated until they reach study endpoints [starting on renal replacement therapy or reaching estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) expressed as mL/min/1.73 m2 ≤ 10 mL/min/1.73m2, or the last follow-up date, or data lock on December 31, 2021, or death]. Data on antihypertensive prescription practices in correspondence to baseline eGFR, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, primary CKD aetiology, and cardiovascular disease were evaluated. Associations between patients who were prescribed three or more antihypertensive agents and their clinical outcomes were studied by Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated differences in survival probabilities. RESULTS Three thousand two hundred and thirty non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients with data collected between October 2002 and December 2019 were included. The median age was 65 years. A greater proportion of patients were taking three or more antihypertensive agents with advancing CKD stages (53% of eGFR ≤ 15 mL/min/1.73m2 vs 26% of eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2, P < 0.001). An increased number of patients receiving more classes of antihypertensive agents was observed as the urine albumin-creatinine ratio category increased (category A3: 62% vs category A1: 40%, P < 0.001), with the upward trends particularly noticeable in the number of individuals prescribed renin angiotensin system blockers. The prescription of three or more antihypertensive agents was associated with all-cause mortality, independent of blood pressure control (hazard ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.27, P = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier analysis illustrated significant differences in survival outcomes between patients with three or more and those with less than three antihypertensive agents prescribed (log-rank, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Antihypertensive prescribing patterns in the Salford Kidney Study based on CKD stage were consistent with expectations from the current United Kingdom National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guideline algorithm. Outcomes were poorer in patients with poor blood pressure control despite being on multiple antihypertensive agents. Continued research is required to bridge remaining variations in hypertension treatment practices worldwide.
非透析依赖型慢性肾病患者的抗高血压处方模式:索尔福德肾脏研究结果
背景慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者常会出现高血压。由于高血压与 CKD 之间存在复杂的双向因果关系,因此寻找最佳治疗方案仍具有挑战性。降压治疗方法仍存在差异。目的 了解 CKD 患者的降压处方模式。方法 索尔福德肾脏研究是一项正在进行的前瞻性研究,自 2002 年以来一直在招募 CKD 患者。所有患者每年都会接受随访,包括用药清单在内的医疗记录会不断更新,直到他们达到研究终点[开始接受肾脏替代治疗或估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)达到 mL/min/1.73 m2 ≤ 10 mL/min/1.73 m2,或最后一次随访日期,或数据锁定在 2021 年 12 月 31 日,或死亡]。评估了与基线 eGFR、尿白蛋白-肌酐比值、原发性 CKD 病因和心血管疾病相对应的降压处方数据。通过 Cox 回归分析研究了处方三种或三种以上降压药的患者与其临床结果之间的关系。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示了生存概率的差异。结果 共纳入 3230 名非透析依赖型 CKD 患者,数据收集时间为 2002 年 10 月至 2019 年 12 月。中位年龄为 65 岁。随着 CKD 阶段的增加,服用三种或三种以上降压药的患者比例增加(eGFR ≤ 15 mL/min/1.73m2 的患者为 53% vs eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2 的患者为 26%,P < 0.001)。随着尿白蛋白-肌酐比值类别的增加,接受更多类别降压药物治疗的患者人数也在增加(A3 类别:62% vs A1 类别:40%,P <0.001),其中肾素血管紧张素系统阻滞剂处方人数的上升趋势尤为明显。处方三种或三种以上降压药与全因死亡率有关,与血压控制无关(危险比:1.15;95% 置信区间:1.04-1.27,P = 0.006)。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,使用三种或三种以上抗高血压药物的患者与使用三种以下抗高血压药物的患者在生存率方面存在显著差异(对数秩,P < 0.001)。结论 索尔福德肾脏研究中基于 CKD 分期的抗高血压处方模式与英国国家健康与护理优化研究所现行指南算法的预期一致。尽管使用了多种降压药,但血压控制不佳的患者预后较差。需要继续开展研究,以弥合全球高血压治疗实践中仍然存在的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信