An appraisal of the Fife Community Health Report.

H S Kohli
{"title":"An appraisal of the Fife Community Health Report.","authors":"H S Kohli","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Acheson Report highlights confusion about responsibilities and the poor communication in the control of communicable disease. There is evidence that printed sources of information appear high in the list of reported use of information sources by doctors, although health professionals appear to make poor use of them. This interview survey, conducted by telephone, ascertained the views of 83 recipients of the Fife Community Health Report (CHR) -a monthly communicable disease/environmental health newsletter for community and primary care health staff working in Fife. The 83 individuals interviewed were representing their practice or group of health staff so that the consensus of each group was being sought in the interview. The response rate was 100 per cent and 95 per cent of the respondents stated that all the members of their practice or group read the CHR. Ninety per cent thought the CHR was relevant to their work, and 64 per cent filed it for future reference. However, criticisms were made about the quality of printing. As a result of the survey, improvements have been initiated in the CHR, including the proposed use of desk top publishing (DTP) in its production. Furthermore, the survey has initiated proposals for a similar report in the Greater Glasgow Health Board.</p>","PeriodicalId":75726,"journal":{"name":"Community medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":"97-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042465","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Acheson Report highlights confusion about responsibilities and the poor communication in the control of communicable disease. There is evidence that printed sources of information appear high in the list of reported use of information sources by doctors, although health professionals appear to make poor use of them. This interview survey, conducted by telephone, ascertained the views of 83 recipients of the Fife Community Health Report (CHR) -a monthly communicable disease/environmental health newsletter for community and primary care health staff working in Fife. The 83 individuals interviewed were representing their practice or group of health staff so that the consensus of each group was being sought in the interview. The response rate was 100 per cent and 95 per cent of the respondents stated that all the members of their practice or group read the CHR. Ninety per cent thought the CHR was relevant to their work, and 64 per cent filed it for future reference. However, criticisms were made about the quality of printing. As a result of the survey, improvements have been initiated in the CHR, including the proposed use of desk top publishing (DTP) in its production. Furthermore, the survey has initiated proposals for a similar report in the Greater Glasgow Health Board.

对生命社区健康报告的评价。
艾奇逊报告强调了在控制传染病方面对责任的混淆和沟通不畅。有证据表明,在报告的医生使用信息来源的清单中,印刷信息来源的比例很高,尽管卫生专业人员似乎没有充分利用它们。这项电话访谈调查确定了83名《法夫社区卫生报告》(CHR)收信人的意见。《报告》是一份面向在法夫工作的社区和初级保健保健工作人员的传染病/环境卫生月刊。接受采访的83人代表他们的做法或保健工作人员群体,因此在采访中寻求每个群体的共识。回复率为100%,95%的受访者表示,他们的执业或团体的所有成员阅读人权。90%的人认为人权报告与他们的工作有关,64%的人将其存档以供今后参考。然而,人们对印刷质量提出了批评。调查的结果是,《人权报告》已开始改进,包括建议在其制作中使用桌面出版。此外,调查还提出了在大格拉斯哥卫生委员会编写类似报告的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信