Alcoholism: abstinence, improvement, and no improvement in general population.

G A Hayes, D I Templer, M A Jansen, C R Graham
{"title":"Alcoholism: abstinence, improvement, and no improvement in general population.","authors":"G A Hayes,&nbsp;D I Templer,&nbsp;M A Jansen,&nbsp;C R Graham","doi":"10.1300/J251v08n02_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditionally, in the field of alcoholism research, abstinence has been considered the sole measure of treatment success and patients found to be drinking at follow-up were automatically considered to be treatment failures. In recent years this dichotomous approach has been criticized in light of studies on post-treatment status that reveal patients to be drinking and functioning at an improved level. Although there has been a convergence of evidence indicating that some treated alcoholics progress toward an improved but not abstinent status, such improvement in drinking status had apparently not previously been investigated in a general population. Such was the purpose of the present study with 529 subjects. Of the persons who reported previous alcoholic drinking level from 49% to 63% reported current subcriterion drinking. It was inferred that these findings combine with the findings from treated alcoholic and other special populations to form a more pervasive perspective of movement from alcoholic to subalcoholic drinking levels. Although the authors see some overlap with the topic of moderate drinking oriented treatment programs, they view specific recommendations as premature.</p>","PeriodicalId":77481,"journal":{"name":"Advances in alcohol & substance abuse","volume":"8 2","pages":"87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J251v08n02_05","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in alcohol & substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J251v08n02_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Traditionally, in the field of alcoholism research, abstinence has been considered the sole measure of treatment success and patients found to be drinking at follow-up were automatically considered to be treatment failures. In recent years this dichotomous approach has been criticized in light of studies on post-treatment status that reveal patients to be drinking and functioning at an improved level. Although there has been a convergence of evidence indicating that some treated alcoholics progress toward an improved but not abstinent status, such improvement in drinking status had apparently not previously been investigated in a general population. Such was the purpose of the present study with 529 subjects. Of the persons who reported previous alcoholic drinking level from 49% to 63% reported current subcriterion drinking. It was inferred that these findings combine with the findings from treated alcoholic and other special populations to form a more pervasive perspective of movement from alcoholic to subalcoholic drinking levels. Although the authors see some overlap with the topic of moderate drinking oriented treatment programs, they view specific recommendations as premature.

酒精中毒:戒除,改善,一般人群无改善。
传统上,在酒精中毒研究领域,戒酒一直被认为是治疗成功的唯一衡量标准,在随访中发现酗酒的患者自动被认为是治疗失败。近年来,这种二分法受到了批评,因为对治疗后状态的研究表明,患者的饮酒和功能水平有所提高。虽然有证据表明,一些接受治疗的酗酒者在改善而不是戒酒方面取得了进展,但这种饮酒状况的改善显然以前没有在一般人群中进行过调查。这就是本研究对529名受试者进行研究的目的。在报告以前饮酒水平的人中,49%至63%报告目前的亚标准饮酒。据推测,这些发现与接受治疗的酗酒者和其他特殊人群的发现相结合,形成了一个更普遍的观点,即从酒精饮酒到亚酒精饮酒水平的变化。虽然作者看到了一些与适度饮酒导向的治疗方案的主题重叠,但他们认为具体的建议还为时过早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信