Auditory brainstem responses and ultrasound changes in a high-risk infants population.

Helvetica paediatrica acta Pub Date : 1989-06-01
C Guinard, C L Fawer, P A Despland, A Calame
{"title":"Auditory brainstem responses and ultrasound changes in a high-risk infants population.","authors":"C Guinard,&nbsp;C L Fawer,&nbsp;P A Despland,&nbsp;A Calame","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>50 neonates were selected in a high perinatal risk population and examined by means of cerebral ultrasound (US) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). They were allocated in 5 groups according to their US diagnosis (normal scans, isolated peri-intraventricular haemorrhage, large haemorrhage with associated lesions, hypoxic-ischaemic lesions in term neonates, miscellaneous disorders). ABR abnormalities were found in 40% of the infants. They were more frequent in neonates with cerebral lesions. Furthermore, the more extensive the cerebral lesions, the more severe the ABR abnormalities. Most of the ABR changes were of audiological type (severe: threshold greater than 80 dB [14%]; moderate: threshold less than or equal to 80 dB [20%]), whereas neurological abnormalities were rare (6%). The prognostic value of ABR appears in this study to depend on the possible recovery in the neonatal period. Severe hearing loss was associated either with an early death or with major handicaps. ABR represent the method of first choice for the detection of hearing loss in the Neonatal Unit, while they seemed to be of limited value in assessing brainstem function.</p>","PeriodicalId":75904,"journal":{"name":"Helvetica paediatrica acta","volume":"43 5-6","pages":"377-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helvetica paediatrica acta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

50 neonates were selected in a high perinatal risk population and examined by means of cerebral ultrasound (US) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). They were allocated in 5 groups according to their US diagnosis (normal scans, isolated peri-intraventricular haemorrhage, large haemorrhage with associated lesions, hypoxic-ischaemic lesions in term neonates, miscellaneous disorders). ABR abnormalities were found in 40% of the infants. They were more frequent in neonates with cerebral lesions. Furthermore, the more extensive the cerebral lesions, the more severe the ABR abnormalities. Most of the ABR changes were of audiological type (severe: threshold greater than 80 dB [14%]; moderate: threshold less than or equal to 80 dB [20%]), whereas neurological abnormalities were rare (6%). The prognostic value of ABR appears in this study to depend on the possible recovery in the neonatal period. Severe hearing loss was associated either with an early death or with major handicaps. ABR represent the method of first choice for the detection of hearing loss in the Neonatal Unit, while they seemed to be of limited value in assessing brainstem function.

高危婴儿人群的听觉脑干反应和超声变化。
从围产期高危人群中选择50例新生儿,采用脑超声(US)和听性脑干反应(ABR)进行检查。根据他们的美国诊断(正常扫描,孤立的脑室周围出血,大出血合并病变,足月新生儿缺氧缺血性病变,杂项疾病)将他们分为5组。40%的婴儿发现ABR异常。它们在有脑损伤的新生儿中更为常见。此外,脑病变越广泛,ABR异常越严重。大多数ABR改变为听力学型(严重:阈值大于80 dB [14%];中度:阈值小于或等于80db[20%]),而神经异常罕见(6%)。在这项研究中,ABR的预后价值似乎取决于新生儿期的可能恢复。严重的听力损失要么与早期死亡有关,要么与重大残疾有关。ABR是检测新生儿听力损失的首选方法,但它们在评估脑干功能方面的价值有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信