Implementing Effective Care in a University Population Based on National Vaccination Recommendations.

Julie Richards, Kevin Brunacini, Nancy Stoll, Robyn Tepper
{"title":"Implementing Effective Care in a University Population Based on National Vaccination Recommendations.","authors":"Julie Richards, Kevin Brunacini, Nancy Stoll, Robyn Tepper","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccines are among the most cost-effective and successful medical interventions, saving approximately 2.3 million lives annually. Unfortunately, vaccination coverage for adults remains low, leading to unnecessary and costly health consequences. An initial chart review revealed that 95% (N = 20) of students were not up to date with vaccines. In a patient survey, 100% of students (N = 21) did not recall receiving useful vaccine information, but 66.7% reported it would be helpful (≥4 of 5 on the Likert scale). Strategies supporting effective care, an Institute of Medicine quality domain, were used to address these gaps. The aim was to increase effective care in university adult students for vaccines by 30% over 90 days. The quality improvement method of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles was used to evaluate iterative tests of change. Examining contextual elements, team and patient feedback, aggregate data, and run charts informed tests of change over 4 cycles. Core interventions included enhanced screening, vaccine shared decision-making, provider checklists, and a team engagement plan. Greater than 83% (N = 152) of students were not up to date with vaccines as per national guidelines. Over 8 weeks, the team effectively referred students for 265 of the 274 vaccines they were eligible for-an accuracy rate of 95.3%. The aim score, a mean composite score reflecting all 3 interventions, increased from 49% to 95%. Effective care for vaccine uptake increased by 83.8%-far exceeding the goal. Campus health centers and other primary care settings could benefit from adopting a similar strategy that provides clear benefits to patients and the broader community while decreasing health care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccines are among the most cost-effective and successful medical interventions, saving approximately 2.3 million lives annually. Unfortunately, vaccination coverage for adults remains low, leading to unnecessary and costly health consequences. An initial chart review revealed that 95% (N = 20) of students were not up to date with vaccines. In a patient survey, 100% of students (N = 21) did not recall receiving useful vaccine information, but 66.7% reported it would be helpful (≥4 of 5 on the Likert scale). Strategies supporting effective care, an Institute of Medicine quality domain, were used to address these gaps. The aim was to increase effective care in university adult students for vaccines by 30% over 90 days. The quality improvement method of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles was used to evaluate iterative tests of change. Examining contextual elements, team and patient feedback, aggregate data, and run charts informed tests of change over 4 cycles. Core interventions included enhanced screening, vaccine shared decision-making, provider checklists, and a team engagement plan. Greater than 83% (N = 152) of students were not up to date with vaccines as per national guidelines. Over 8 weeks, the team effectively referred students for 265 of the 274 vaccines they were eligible for-an accuracy rate of 95.3%. The aim score, a mean composite score reflecting all 3 interventions, increased from 49% to 95%. Effective care for vaccine uptake increased by 83.8%-far exceeding the goal. Campus health centers and other primary care settings could benefit from adopting a similar strategy that provides clear benefits to patients and the broader community while decreasing health care costs.

根据国家疫苗接种建议,在大学人群中实施有效护理。
疫苗是最具成本效益和最成功的医疗干预措施之一,每年可挽救约 230 万人的生命。遗憾的是,成人疫苗接种覆盖率仍然很低,导致了不必要且昂贵的健康后果。初步病历审查显示,95%(N = 20)的学生没有接种最新疫苗。在一项患者调查中,100% 的学生(N = 21)不记得收到过有用的疫苗信息,但有 66.7% 的学生表示收到过有用的信息(李克特量表 5 分中≥4 分)。为弥补这些差距,我们采用了支持有效护理的策略(医学研究所的一个质量领域)。目标是在 90 天内将成人大学生接种疫苗的有效率提高 30%。采用 "计划-执行-研究-行动 "循环的质量改进方法来评估变革的迭代测试。在 4 个周期中,对环境因素、团队和患者反馈、综合数据和运行图表进行检查,为变革测试提供依据。核心干预措施包括加强筛查、疫苗共同决策、提供者核对表和团队参与计划。根据国家指导方针,超过 83% 的学生(N = 152)没有接种最新疫苗。在 8 周的时间里,该团队为学生有效转介了 274 种符合接种条件的疫苗中的 265 种,准确率达 95.3%。目标得分(反映所有 3 项干预措施的平均综合得分)从 49% 提高到 95%。疫苗接种的有效护理率提高了 83.8%,远远超过了目标。校园健康中心和其他初级医疗机构可以从采用类似的策略中受益,这种策略在降低医疗成本的同时,还能为患者和更广泛的社区带来明显的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信