Third-Line Overactive Bladder Therapies on TikTok: What Does the Public Learn?

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001431
Alexandra L Tabakin, Sharon Choi, Arshia Sandozi, Kelli Aibel, Michael A Weintraub, Harvey A Winkler, Dara F Shalom, Justina Tam, Wai Lee
{"title":"Third-Line Overactive Bladder Therapies on TikTok: What Does the Public Learn?","authors":"Alexandra L Tabakin, Sharon Choi, Arshia Sandozi, Kelli Aibel, Michael A Weintraub, Harvey A Winkler, Dara F Shalom, Justina Tam, Wai Lee","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Millions of people rely on social media platforms, including TikTok, for health-related information. TikTok has not yet been evaluated as an information source for overactive bladder (OAB) third-line therapies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to assess TikTok videos on third-line therapies for OAB for misinformation and quality.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this cross-sectional analysis, we abstracted the top 50 TikTok videos for keywords: \"Axonics,\" \"sacral neuromodulation,\" \"Interstim,\" \"PTNS,\" \"posterior tibial nerve stimulation,\" and \"bladder Botox.\" Videos were scored for quality by 3 independent reviewers using the Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET). Two reviewers determined if videos contained misinformation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 300 videos screened, 119 videos were included. Twenty-four (21%) were created by medical professionals (MPs). Medical professional videos were more frequently shared (5 vs 1, P < 0.01) but had similar views, likes, comments, and length. Although MP videos had significantly higher MQ-VET scores (43 vs 27, P < 0.01), there was no difference in the rate of misinformation between MP and non-MP videos (21% vs 18%). Twenty-two videos (18.4%) contained misinformation, which were 3 times longer (50.5 vs 15 seconds, P < 0.01) and had higher MQ-VET scores (34.5 vs 27, P = 0.03) than those without misinformation. Common themes of misinformation pertained to therapy indication, mechanism of action, and patient limitations after undergoing therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many TikTok videos on OAB third-line therapies contain misinformation. Most of these videos were not of high quality and created by the public. Medical professionals should be aware of misinformation permeating TikTok, given its large audience, and aim to promote or offer educational material of better accuracy and quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Millions of people rely on social media platforms, including TikTok, for health-related information. TikTok has not yet been evaluated as an information source for overactive bladder (OAB) third-line therapies.

Objectives: Our aim was to assess TikTok videos on third-line therapies for OAB for misinformation and quality.

Study design: In this cross-sectional analysis, we abstracted the top 50 TikTok videos for keywords: "Axonics," "sacral neuromodulation," "Interstim," "PTNS," "posterior tibial nerve stimulation," and "bladder Botox." Videos were scored for quality by 3 independent reviewers using the Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET). Two reviewers determined if videos contained misinformation.

Results: Of 300 videos screened, 119 videos were included. Twenty-four (21%) were created by medical professionals (MPs). Medical professional videos were more frequently shared (5 vs 1, P < 0.01) but had similar views, likes, comments, and length. Although MP videos had significantly higher MQ-VET scores (43 vs 27, P < 0.01), there was no difference in the rate of misinformation between MP and non-MP videos (21% vs 18%). Twenty-two videos (18.4%) contained misinformation, which were 3 times longer (50.5 vs 15 seconds, P < 0.01) and had higher MQ-VET scores (34.5 vs 27, P = 0.03) than those without misinformation. Common themes of misinformation pertained to therapy indication, mechanism of action, and patient limitations after undergoing therapy.

Conclusions: Many TikTok videos on OAB third-line therapies contain misinformation. Most of these videos were not of high quality and created by the public. Medical professionals should be aware of misinformation permeating TikTok, given its large audience, and aim to promote or offer educational material of better accuracy and quality.

TikTok 上的第三线膀胱过度活动症疗法:公众能学到什么?
重要性:数百万人依靠包括 TikTok 在内的社交媒体平台获取健康相关信息。TikTok尚未被评估为膀胱过度活动症(OAB)三线疗法的信息来源:我们的目的是评估 TikTok 有关 OAB 三线疗法视频的错误信息和质量:在这项横向分析中,我们摘录了关键词排名前 50 位的 TikTok 视频:"Axonics"、"骶神经调节"、"Interstim"、"PTNS"、"胫后神经刺激 "和 "膀胱肉毒素"。视频质量由 3 位独立评审员使用 "医疗质量视频评估工具"(MQ-VET)进行评分。两名审查员确定视频是否包含错误信息:结果:在筛选出的 300 个视频中,有 119 个视频被收录。其中 24 个视频(21%)由医疗专业人员(MPs)制作。医疗专业人士的视频被分享的频率更高(5 比 1,P < 0.01),但浏览量、点赞数、评论和视频长度都差不多。虽然 MP 视频的 MQ-VET 得分明显更高(43 分 vs 27 分,P < 0.01),但 MP 和非 MP 视频的错误信息率并无差异(21% vs 18%)。有 22 个视频(18.4%)包含错误信息,与不包含错误信息的视频相比,这些视频的时间长了 3 倍(50.5 秒 vs 15 秒,P < 0.01),MQ-VET 分数也更高(34.5 分 vs 27 分,P = 0.03)。常见的错误信息主题涉及治疗适应症、作用机制和患者接受治疗后的限制:结论:许多关于 OAB 三线疗法的 TikTok 视频都包含错误信息。结论:许多关于 OAB 三线疗法的 TikTok 视频都包含错误信息,这些视频大多质量不高,而且是由公众制作的。鉴于 TikTok 的受众众多,医疗专业人员应警惕 TikTok 上弥漫的错误信息,并致力于推广或提供更准确、质量更高的教育材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信