Measurement of perineal tears as an additional tool for laceration assessment during vaginal birth.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2023-12-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/174310
Maristela B M Urasaki, Marlise O P Lima, Roselane Gonçalves, Natalucia M Araújo, Carolina G S Pereira
{"title":"Measurement of perineal tears as an additional tool for laceration assessment during vaginal birth.","authors":"Maristela B M Urasaki, Marlise O P Lima, Roselane Gonçalves, Natalucia M Araújo, Carolina G S Pereira","doi":"10.18332/ejm/174310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spontaneous lacerations at vaginal birth are everyday events, but their classification and management still challenge midwifery care. This study aims to measure and describe first-degree and second-degree perineal lacerations resulting from vaginal birth, describe their repair, and the education provided for care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive study was conducted in a public maternity hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, with 87 parturients. Data were collected between October 2017 and June 2018 using a structured instrument containing obstetric variables and a description of lacerations. The obstetricians and nurse midwives assisted with births, determining the degree of laceration and intervention, and the researchers measured and reported them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of parturients (82.7%) had lacerations only in the anterior region, 8% had them in the posterior region, and 9.2% in both regions. The lacerations were classified as first-degree (78.1%) or second-degree (21.8%). Among the 32 nulliparous parturients, 27.6% had first-degree lacerations, and 9.2% had second-degree. Of the 55 multiparous parturients, 50.6% had first-degree, and 12.6% had second-degree. Among the lacerations assessed as first-degree, 25% had deeper tissue layers compromised in addition to the skin and mucosa. There were 180 lacerations, with an average length of 33.1 mm, depth of 19.8 mm, and width of 23.8 mm. Half of the parturients did not receive guidance on laceration care. There was no association between parity and size, number, location, or degree classification of lacerations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a broad description of the characteristics of perineal lacerations and presents measurement techniques as a complementary resource for evaluating lacerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/174310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous lacerations at vaginal birth are everyday events, but their classification and management still challenge midwifery care. This study aims to measure and describe first-degree and second-degree perineal lacerations resulting from vaginal birth, describe their repair, and the education provided for care.

Methods: A descriptive study was conducted in a public maternity hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, with 87 parturients. Data were collected between October 2017 and June 2018 using a structured instrument containing obstetric variables and a description of lacerations. The obstetricians and nurse midwives assisted with births, determining the degree of laceration and intervention, and the researchers measured and reported them.

Results: The majority of parturients (82.7%) had lacerations only in the anterior region, 8% had them in the posterior region, and 9.2% in both regions. The lacerations were classified as first-degree (78.1%) or second-degree (21.8%). Among the 32 nulliparous parturients, 27.6% had first-degree lacerations, and 9.2% had second-degree. Of the 55 multiparous parturients, 50.6% had first-degree, and 12.6% had second-degree. Among the lacerations assessed as first-degree, 25% had deeper tissue layers compromised in addition to the skin and mucosa. There were 180 lacerations, with an average length of 33.1 mm, depth of 19.8 mm, and width of 23.8 mm. Half of the parturients did not receive guidance on laceration care. There was no association between parity and size, number, location, or degree classification of lacerations.

Conclusions: This study provides a broad description of the characteristics of perineal lacerations and presents measurement techniques as a complementary resource for evaluating lacerations.

测量会阴裂伤,作为阴道分娩过程中评估裂伤的补充工具。
介绍:阴道分娩时的自发性裂伤是日常事件,但其分类和处理仍是助产护理的难题。本研究旨在测量和描述阴道分娩造成的一度和二度会阴裂伤,介绍其修复方法以及提供的护理教育:在巴西圣保罗的一家公立妇产医院对87名产妇进行了描述性研究。数据收集时间为2017年10月至2018年6月,使用的结构化工具包含产科变量和裂伤描述。产科医生和助产士协助分娩,确定裂伤程度和干预措施,研究人员对其进行测量和报告:大多数产妇(82.7%)的裂伤只发生在前区,8%发生在后区,9.2%同时发生在两个区域。裂伤分为一级裂伤(78.1%)和二级裂伤(21.8%)。在 32 名单胎产妇中,27.6% 为一级裂伤,9.2% 为二级裂伤。在 55 名多产产妇中,50.6% 为一级裂伤,12.6% 为二级裂伤。在被评估为一级裂伤的患者中,25%的患者除了皮肤和粘膜外,深层组织也受到了损伤。共有 180 处撕裂伤,平均长度为 33.1 毫米,深度为 19.8 毫米,宽度为 23.8 毫米。半数产妇未接受裂伤护理指导。产次与裂伤的大小、数量、位置或程度分类之间没有关联:本研究对会阴裂伤的特征进行了广泛的描述,并提出了测量技术作为评估裂伤的补充资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信