A Characterization of Neurology Consults for Inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Compared to Other Respiratory Viruses.

IF 3.2 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brian E Emmert, Stephanie Gandelman, David Do, Kevin Donovan, Dennis L Kolson, Matthew K Schindler
{"title":"A Characterization of Neurology Consults for Inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Compared to Other Respiratory Viruses.","authors":"Brian E Emmert, Stephanie Gandelman, David Do, Kevin Donovan, Dennis L Kolson, Matthew K Schindler","doi":"10.3390/neurolint15040089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Neurological consultation for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 is common; it is currently unknown whether the neurologist's approach to inpatient consultation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 should differ from the paradigm used to evaluate hospitalized patients with similar respiratory viruses. The goal of the present study is to determine if the preponderance of new neurologic diagnoses differs between inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 and similar non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses for whom neurology is consulted. <b>Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective chart analysis of inpatient neurologic consultations at three major Philadelphia-based hospitals. We compared the final neurologic diagnosis of 152 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 to 54 patients with a similar ubiquitous non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory virus (influenza A, influenza B, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, or adenovirus, the most commonly tested respiratory viruses at our institution). Secondary metrics included age, sex, level of care, prior neurologic diagnoses, and mortality. A multinomial logistic regression model was utilized to evaluate the relative difference between diagnostic category groups on all metrics. <b>Results:</b> The proportion of patients with seizure who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly higher than those who were admitted to a medical-surgical floor. SARS-CoV-2 was also associated with increased risk for ICU admission compared to other common respiratory viruses. SARS-CoV-2 inpatients requiring neurologic consultation were also more likely to be older and female as compared to the non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort. In other domains, the proportion of neurologic diagnoses between SAR-CoV-2 and non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses showed no significant difference. <b>Conclusion:</b> Patients requiring inpatient neurologic consultation with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection or another respiratory virus were found to be remarkably similar in terms of their ultimate neurologic diagnosis, with the exception of a larger preponderance of seizure in critical-care-level patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study suggests that the neurological approach to patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 should be similar to that for patients with similar common respiratory infections, noting that seizure was seen more frequently in critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"15 4","pages":"1393-1402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10745801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint15040089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neurological consultation for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 is common; it is currently unknown whether the neurologist's approach to inpatient consultation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 should differ from the paradigm used to evaluate hospitalized patients with similar respiratory viruses. The goal of the present study is to determine if the preponderance of new neurologic diagnoses differs between inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 and similar non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses for whom neurology is consulted. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart analysis of inpatient neurologic consultations at three major Philadelphia-based hospitals. We compared the final neurologic diagnosis of 152 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 to 54 patients with a similar ubiquitous non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory virus (influenza A, influenza B, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, or adenovirus, the most commonly tested respiratory viruses at our institution). Secondary metrics included age, sex, level of care, prior neurologic diagnoses, and mortality. A multinomial logistic regression model was utilized to evaluate the relative difference between diagnostic category groups on all metrics. Results: The proportion of patients with seizure who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly higher than those who were admitted to a medical-surgical floor. SARS-CoV-2 was also associated with increased risk for ICU admission compared to other common respiratory viruses. SARS-CoV-2 inpatients requiring neurologic consultation were also more likely to be older and female as compared to the non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort. In other domains, the proportion of neurologic diagnoses between SAR-CoV-2 and non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Patients requiring inpatient neurologic consultation with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection or another respiratory virus were found to be remarkably similar in terms of their ultimate neurologic diagnosis, with the exception of a larger preponderance of seizure in critical-care-level patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study suggests that the neurological approach to patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 should be similar to that for patients with similar common respiratory infections, noting that seizure was seen more frequently in critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.

与其他呼吸道病毒相比,SARS-CoV-2 感染住院患者的神经科咨询特点。
导言:对感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者进行神经科会诊很常见;目前尚不清楚神经科医生对 SARS-CoV-2 患者进行住院会诊的方法是否应不同于对感染类似呼吸道病毒的住院患者进行评估的方法。本研究的目的是确定神经科会诊的 SARS-CoV-2 和类似的非 SARS-CoV-2 呼吸道病毒住院患者新诊断出的神经系统疾病的比例是否存在差异。方法:我们对费城三家大型医院的住院神经科会诊患者进行了回顾性病历分析。我们比较了 152 名感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者与 54 名感染类似的无处不在的非 SARS-CoV-2 呼吸道病毒(甲型流感、乙型流感、呼吸道合胞病毒、鼻病毒或腺病毒,我们医院最常检测的呼吸道病毒)的患者的最终神经诊断结果。次要指标包括年龄、性别、护理级别、既往神经系统诊断和死亡率。采用多项式逻辑回归模型来评估诊断类别组之间在所有指标上的相对差异。结果显示在重症监护病房(ICU)住院的癫痫发作患者中,感染 SARS-CoV-2 的比例明显高于内外科住院患者。与其他常见呼吸道病毒相比,SARS-CoV-2 也增加了患者入住重症监护室的风险。需要神经科会诊的 SARS-CoV-2 住院病人与非 SARS-CoV-2 住院病人相比,也更可能是老年人和女性。在其他方面,SARS-CoV-2 和非 SARS-CoV-2 呼吸道病毒之间的神经系统诊断比例没有明显差异。结论需要住院神经科会诊并诊断为 SARS-CoV-2 感染或其他呼吸道病毒感染的患者,其最终的神经系统诊断结果非常相似,但 SARS-CoV-2 感染的重症监护患者中癫痫发作的比例更高。我们的研究表明,对感染 SARS-CoV-2 的住院病人采取的神经系统治疗方法应与感染类似普通呼吸道感染的病人相似,但要注意的是,在感染 SARS-CoV-2 的重症病人中,癫痫发作更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信