On the state of financial research: Is it in a silo?

A. S. M. Sohel Azad, Abdelaziz Chazi, Ashraf Khallaf, Zaher Zantout
{"title":"On the state of financial research: Is it in a silo?","authors":"A. S. M. Sohel Azad, Abdelaziz Chazi, Ashraf Khallaf, Zaher Zantout","doi":"10.1111/acfi.13210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study on the state of financial research analysed the citations made in leading business and economics journals in the period 1997–2020. It found that, contrary to other business fields, and despite citing more references, finance researchers overlooked the fruitful mode of knowledge creation by integrating advances from disciplines other than economics. Additionally, citations in economics became disproportionate to older papers. Furthermore, intradisciplinary citations remained predominantly in the same four journals, although others became prominent. These findings on the state of financial research supplement other issues inhibiting finance knowledge progression and have inferences regarding the training of future scholars.","PeriodicalId":501109,"journal":{"name":"Accounting & Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study on the state of financial research analysed the citations made in leading business and economics journals in the period 1997–2020. It found that, contrary to other business fields, and despite citing more references, finance researchers overlooked the fruitful mode of knowledge creation by integrating advances from disciplines other than economics. Additionally, citations in economics became disproportionate to older papers. Furthermore, intradisciplinary citations remained predominantly in the same four journals, although others became prominent. These findings on the state of financial research supplement other issues inhibiting finance knowledge progression and have inferences regarding the training of future scholars.
金融研究现状:金融研究是否各自为政?
这项关于金融研究现状的研究分析了 1997-2020 年间主要商业和经济学期刊的引用情况。研究发现,与其他商业领域相反,尽管引用了更多的参考文献,但金融研究人员忽视了通过整合经济学以外学科的进展来创造知识的有效模式。此外,经济学的引用与较早的论文不成比例。此外,学科内引文仍主要集中在同四种期刊上,尽管其他期刊也变得引人注目。这些关于金融研究现状的发现补充了阻碍金融知识进步的其他问题,并对未来学者的培养具有推论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信