SDG commentary: services from institutions that offer fair and sustainable living for all humans

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Ross Gordon, Josina Vink
{"title":"SDG commentary: services from institutions that offer fair and sustainable living for all humans","authors":"Ross Gordon, Josina Vink","doi":"10.1108/jsm-05-2023-0182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this commentary is to present a critically constructive examination of the contribution of service research to the development of services from institutions that offer fair and sustainable living for all humans.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors draw upon critical thinking and critical social theory to problematise the neoliberal agenda (e.g. marketisation and privatisation) that shapes the service ecosystems within which the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and service research relating to SDG11 – sustainable cities and communities – and SDG16 – peace, justice and strong institutions – are often based. The authors critically review extant literature aimed at these goals and present constructive pathways for transformative social change to foster fair and sustainable living for all.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors find that the United Nations institutions, the SDGs and the service ecosystems that shape the research and practice addressing SDG11 and SDG16 are often grounded in neoliberal capitalist ideology that may inhibit transformative change. While service research has made some relevant and important contributions to support the development of services from institutions that offer fair and sustainable living, there is a need to consider alternative assumptions upon which service research and service design can be based to fully realise such transformative goals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This commentary encourages service research scholars to engage with critically constructive perspectives that harness critique for transformative change.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Services Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Services Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-05-2023-0182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this commentary is to present a critically constructive examination of the contribution of service research to the development of services from institutions that offer fair and sustainable living for all humans.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors draw upon critical thinking and critical social theory to problematise the neoliberal agenda (e.g. marketisation and privatisation) that shapes the service ecosystems within which the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and service research relating to SDG11 – sustainable cities and communities – and SDG16 – peace, justice and strong institutions – are often based. The authors critically review extant literature aimed at these goals and present constructive pathways for transformative social change to foster fair and sustainable living for all.

Findings

The authors find that the United Nations institutions, the SDGs and the service ecosystems that shape the research and practice addressing SDG11 and SDG16 are often grounded in neoliberal capitalist ideology that may inhibit transformative change. While service research has made some relevant and important contributions to support the development of services from institutions that offer fair and sustainable living, there is a need to consider alternative assumptions upon which service research and service design can be based to fully realise such transformative goals.

Originality/value

This commentary encourages service research scholars to engage with critically constructive perspectives that harness critique for transformative change.

可持续发展目标评论:为全人类提供公平和可持续生活的机构提供的服务
本评论旨在以批判性和建设性的视角审视服务研究对机构服务发展的贡献,从而为全人类提供公平和可持续的生活。作者利用批判性思维和批判性社会理论,对新自由主义议程(如市场化和私有化)提出质疑,新自由主义议程塑造了服务生态系统,而可持续发展目标(SDGs)以及与 SDG11(可持续城市和社区)和 SDG16(和平、正义和强有力的机构)相关的服务研究通常都基于服务生态系统。作者批判性地回顾了针对这些目标的现有文献,并提出了变革性社会变革的建设性途径,以促进人人享有公平和可持续的生活。研究结果作者发现,联合国机构、可持续发展目标以及影响针对 SDG11 和 SDG16 的研究和实践的服务生态系统往往以新自由主义资本主义意识形态为基础,这可能会阻碍变革。虽然服务研究做出了一些相关的重要贡献,支持了提供公平和可持续生活的机构服务的发展,但仍有必要考虑服务研究和服务设计所依据的其他假设,以充分实现这些转型目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
20.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: ■Customer policy and service ■Marketing of services ■Marketing planning ■Service marketing abroad ■Service quality Capturing and retaining customers in a service industry is a vastly different activity to its product-based counterpart. The fickle nature of today"s consumer is a vital factor in understanding the factors which determine successful holding of market share - and the intense competition within the sector means practitioners must keep pace with new developments if they are to outwit competitors and develop customer loyalty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信