The Philosophical Perspective in Transculturizing Instrument Tools to Detect Diabetic Foot Ulcer : A Literature Review

Sri Wahyuni Awaluddin, Moses Glorino Rumambo Pandin, Nursalam
{"title":"The Philosophical Perspective in Transculturizing Instrument Tools to Detect Diabetic Foot Ulcer : A Literature Review","authors":"Sri Wahyuni Awaluddin, Moses Glorino Rumambo Pandin, Nursalam","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.16.23300092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetes foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the main complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) and one of the main causes of death worldwide from non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The development of an instrument tool for the early diagnosis of diabetic foot is crucial since the findings can be used to prioritize clinical examinations for patients who are at risk. This literature review aimed to examine the philosophical viewpoint on transculturalizing instrument instruments to detect DFU from a variety of study reports published in both domestic and foreign journals. The original research publications published between January 2018 and December 2023 were the focus of the literature search. This study used secondary data, which came from 17 credible journal publications obtained from Science Direct, CINAHL, Pubmed, and SCOPUS databases. The PICOS framework was utilized to assess the papers’ suitability after they were selected. Articles meeting the inclusion requirements would be chosen: the studies should show the outcome of DFU detection or intervention for the outcome, and the population should consist of DM patients with or without DFU, with early DFU detection or intervention for Intervention. The studies could use any kind of research design, including descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, quasi-experimental, randomized controlled trials, and mixed methods, and should be written in English. The result of this literature review showed all the newly developed instrument tools to detect DFU have tested the validity and reliability of content, particularly translation to the local language to meet cultural appropriateness. It is important for researchers working on new DFU detection risk tools to consider including transcultural theory in their assessment instruments for DFU early detection.","PeriodicalId":501260,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.16.23300092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetes foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the main complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) and one of the main causes of death worldwide from non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The development of an instrument tool for the early diagnosis of diabetic foot is crucial since the findings can be used to prioritize clinical examinations for patients who are at risk. This literature review aimed to examine the philosophical viewpoint on transculturalizing instrument instruments to detect DFU from a variety of study reports published in both domestic and foreign journals. The original research publications published between January 2018 and December 2023 were the focus of the literature search. This study used secondary data, which came from 17 credible journal publications obtained from Science Direct, CINAHL, Pubmed, and SCOPUS databases. The PICOS framework was utilized to assess the papers’ suitability after they were selected. Articles meeting the inclusion requirements would be chosen: the studies should show the outcome of DFU detection or intervention for the outcome, and the population should consist of DM patients with or without DFU, with early DFU detection or intervention for Intervention. The studies could use any kind of research design, including descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, quasi-experimental, randomized controlled trials, and mixed methods, and should be written in English. The result of this literature review showed all the newly developed instrument tools to detect DFU have tested the validity and reliability of content, particularly translation to the local language to meet cultural appropriateness. It is important for researchers working on new DFU detection risk tools to consider including transcultural theory in their assessment instruments for DFU early detection.
检测糖尿病足溃疡的工具工具跨文化的哲学视角:文献综述
糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)是糖尿病(DM)的主要并发症之一,也是全球非传染性疾病(NCDs)的主要致死原因之一。开发一种早期诊断糖尿病足的工具至关重要,因为其结果可用于对高危患者进行优先临床检查。本文献综述旨在从发表在国内外期刊上的各种研究报告中,考察跨文化检测DFU的仪器工具的哲学观点。文献检索的重点是2018年1月至2023年12月期间发表的原始研究出版物。本研究使用了二手数据,这些数据来自Science Direct、CINAHL、Pubmed和SCOPUS数据库中获取的17篇可信期刊论文。在选定论文后,采用 PICOS 框架来评估论文的适宜性。符合纳入要求的文章将被选中:研究应显示 DFU 检测结果或干预结果,研究人群应包括有或没有 DFU 的 DM 患者,并进行早期 DFU 检测或干预。这些研究可以采用任何一种研究设计,包括描述性、横断面、观察性、准实验性、随机对照试验和混合方法,并应以英文撰写。本次文献综述的结果显示,所有新开发的用于检测 DFU 的工具都对内容的有效性和可靠性进行了测试,特别是翻译成当地语言以满足文化适宜性。研究人员在开发新的 DFU 检测风险工具时,必须考虑将跨文化理论纳入其 DFU 早期检测评估工具中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信