Love in a Time of Extinction: Poetic Category and Temporal Impasse in Robert Browning's "Love Among the Ruins"

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 POETRY
John McBratney
{"title":"Love in a Time of Extinction: Poetic Category and Temporal Impasse in Robert Browning's \"Love Among the Ruins\"","authors":"John McBratney","doi":"10.1353/vp.2023.a915651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Love in a Time of Extinction: <span>Poetic Category and Temporal Impasse in Robert Browning’s “Love Among the Ruins”</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> John McBratney (bio) </li> </ul> <p><strong>A</strong>s the first poem in <em>Men and Women</em> (1855), Robert Browning’s “Love Among the Ruins” sets the main theme for the collection, establishing (so it seems) in its final line—“Love is best”—a scale of value in heterosexual relationships against which the treatment of romantic intimacy can be gauged in other poems in the volume.<sup>1</sup> Yet why, as the title of the poem denotes, would Browning set such an all-important human emotion—and such a lyric poem—among the ruins of an ancient city? What connection can there be between two such seemingly ill-sorted entities as romantic passion and antique urban ruins? And how might the yoking of two such disparate themes as eros and an ancient city’s ruination bear on the matter of the poem’s category?<sup>2</sup></p> <p>To answer these questions, we might put critical responses to the poem into two clusters grouped around the two key terms from its title. Critics in the first cluster (by far the larger of the two) have been concerned with the degree to which readers ought to assent to the final line’s bald declaration of love’s preeminent worth. Some insist that we believe it without question, others insist just as vehemently that we view it ironically, and still others feel deeply uncertain whether we ought to find it credible. Critics in the second, smaller cluster have focused more narrowly, in a kind of archaeological source hunting, on linking the ruins in the poem to actual historical ruins—some of them under excavation during the time of the poem’s composition—that might have served as inspiration for the urban remains in Browning’s verse. To each cluster, we might assign a suitable category—the love poem for the first and what Susan Stewart calls the “ruins narrative” for the second—as a pair of lenses through which to examine the themes of romantic passion in the present and the ruination of civilizations in the past.<sup>3</sup> This examination is especially <strong>[End Page 267]</strong> critical in analyzing the interest that both categories in this poem take in the phenomenon of extinction. By exploring this shared interest, we can see not only why these two apparently incompatible partners might belong together in this poem but also how their interaction problematizes the poem’s closing motto.<sup>4</sup> As I hope to show in a revisionist reading of the poem, although we are enjoined to assent to this motto’s declaration, that assent entails acknowledgment of a daunting temporal and romantic impasse—one that prepares readers for the fraught connection between love and time in many of the remaining poems in <em>Men and Women</em>. I conclude by glancing at two sets of poems in the collection, all concerning the imbrication of love and temporality: the first presenting instances of impasse like that in “Love Among the Ruins” and the second offering a means of breaking that deadlock. Throughout, I keep in mind the question of category, building to some final thoughts on the relation between the love lyric and the ruins poem. Let me begin by defining more sharply the two poetic categories that intertwine themselves throughout Browning’s work.</p> <p>In <em>The Art of Love Poetry</em>, Erik Gray “explores the nature of both love and poetry by examining the associations between them, inherent and inherited” (p. 5). He notes the breadth of poetry about love, a breadth that includes many genres: “Love poetry is a capacious category that comprises all poetic genres, and this book draws examples from many types of verse, including longer narrative, dramatic, and didactic poems” (p. 8). “Love Among the Ruins” is, despite its dramatic speaker, clearly a love lyric.<sup>5</sup> The poem’s narrative trajectory—one in which the speaker in the poem (perhaps a shepherd in keeping with the work’s pastoral mode) approaches his beloved for a tryst amid the ruins of an ancient city, encounters her, and finally, in the climax of the lovers’ story, engages her in a kiss—bears this out. Given its climax...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":54107,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN POETRY","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN POETRY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/vp.2023.a915651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Love in a Time of Extinction: Poetic Category and Temporal Impasse in Robert Browning’s “Love Among the Ruins”
  • John McBratney (bio)

As the first poem in Men and Women (1855), Robert Browning’s “Love Among the Ruins” sets the main theme for the collection, establishing (so it seems) in its final line—“Love is best”—a scale of value in heterosexual relationships against which the treatment of romantic intimacy can be gauged in other poems in the volume.1 Yet why, as the title of the poem denotes, would Browning set such an all-important human emotion—and such a lyric poem—among the ruins of an ancient city? What connection can there be between two such seemingly ill-sorted entities as romantic passion and antique urban ruins? And how might the yoking of two such disparate themes as eros and an ancient city’s ruination bear on the matter of the poem’s category?2

To answer these questions, we might put critical responses to the poem into two clusters grouped around the two key terms from its title. Critics in the first cluster (by far the larger of the two) have been concerned with the degree to which readers ought to assent to the final line’s bald declaration of love’s preeminent worth. Some insist that we believe it without question, others insist just as vehemently that we view it ironically, and still others feel deeply uncertain whether we ought to find it credible. Critics in the second, smaller cluster have focused more narrowly, in a kind of archaeological source hunting, on linking the ruins in the poem to actual historical ruins—some of them under excavation during the time of the poem’s composition—that might have served as inspiration for the urban remains in Browning’s verse. To each cluster, we might assign a suitable category—the love poem for the first and what Susan Stewart calls the “ruins narrative” for the second—as a pair of lenses through which to examine the themes of romantic passion in the present and the ruination of civilizations in the past.3 This examination is especially [End Page 267] critical in analyzing the interest that both categories in this poem take in the phenomenon of extinction. By exploring this shared interest, we can see not only why these two apparently incompatible partners might belong together in this poem but also how their interaction problematizes the poem’s closing motto.4 As I hope to show in a revisionist reading of the poem, although we are enjoined to assent to this motto’s declaration, that assent entails acknowledgment of a daunting temporal and romantic impasse—one that prepares readers for the fraught connection between love and time in many of the remaining poems in Men and Women. I conclude by glancing at two sets of poems in the collection, all concerning the imbrication of love and temporality: the first presenting instances of impasse like that in “Love Among the Ruins” and the second offering a means of breaking that deadlock. Throughout, I keep in mind the question of category, building to some final thoughts on the relation between the love lyric and the ruins poem. Let me begin by defining more sharply the two poetic categories that intertwine themselves throughout Browning’s work.

In The Art of Love Poetry, Erik Gray “explores the nature of both love and poetry by examining the associations between them, inherent and inherited” (p. 5). He notes the breadth of poetry about love, a breadth that includes many genres: “Love poetry is a capacious category that comprises all poetic genres, and this book draws examples from many types of verse, including longer narrative, dramatic, and didactic poems” (p. 8). “Love Among the Ruins” is, despite its dramatic speaker, clearly a love lyric.5 The poem’s narrative trajectory—one in which the speaker in the poem (perhaps a shepherd in keeping with the work’s pastoral mode) approaches his beloved for a tryst amid the ruins of an ancient city, encounters her, and finally, in the climax of the lovers’ story, engages her in a kiss—bears this out. Given its climax...

灭绝时代的爱情:罗伯特-勃朗宁的 "废墟中的爱情 "中的诗歌类别与时间僵局
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 灭绝时代的爱情:作为《男人与女人》(1855 年)的第一首诗,罗伯特-勃朗宁的《废墟中的爱情》为诗集确立了主题,在其最后一句--"爱是最好的"--中确立了异性关系的价值尺度,可以据此衡量诗集中其他诗歌对浪漫亲密关系的处理。然而,正如这首诗的标题所示,为什么勃朗宁会将如此重要的人类情感和如此抒情的诗歌放在一座古城的废墟中?浪漫的激情和古老的城市废墟这两个看似格格不入的实体之间会有什么联系呢?2 为了回答这些问题,我们可以将评论界对这首诗的反应分为两组,分别围绕诗歌标题中的两个关键词语。第一组(到目前为止是两组中较大的一组)的批评家们关注的是读者在多大程度上应该同意最后一行关于爱情至高无上的宣言。一些人坚持认为我们应该毫无疑问地相信它,另一些人同样强烈地坚持认为我们应该讽刺地看待它,还有一些人则对我们是否应该相信它深感茫然。第二类批评家的研究范围更窄,他们以一种考古寻源的方式,将诗中的废墟与真实的历史废墟联系起来--其中一些废墟在诗歌创作期间正在挖掘--这些废墟可能是勃朗宁诗句中城市遗迹的灵感来源。我们可以为每一组诗歌指定一个合适的类别--第一类是爱情诗,第二类是苏珊-斯图尔特(Susan Stewart)所说的 "废墟叙事"--以此作为一对透镜,来审视当下浪漫激情和过去文明毁灭的主题3。4 正如我希望通过对这首诗的修正主义解读所展示的,尽管我们被嘱咐要同意这句格言的宣言,但这种同意意味着承认一个令人生畏的时间和浪漫的僵局--这为读者理解《男人与女人》中其余许多诗歌中爱与时间之间充满争议的联系做好了准备。最后,我回顾了诗集中的两组诗歌,它们都与爱情和时间性的结合有关:第一组诗歌呈现了《废墟中的爱情》中的僵局,第二组诗歌则提供了打破僵局的方法。在整个写作过程中,我始终牢记类别问题,最终形成对爱情抒情诗与废墟诗之间关系的一些思考。首先,请允许我更清晰地界定布朗宁作品中相互交织的两个诗歌类别。在《爱情诗的艺术》一书中,埃里克-格雷 "通过研究爱情与诗歌之间固有和传承的联系,探讨了爱情与诗歌的本质"(第 5 页)。他指出,关于爱情的诗歌种类繁多,包括多种体裁:"爱情诗是一个庞大的类别,包含所有诗歌体裁,本书从多种诗歌类型中选取例子,包括长篇叙事诗、戏剧诗和说教诗"(第 8 页)。"5 这首诗的叙事轨迹--诗中的说话者(也许是一位牧羊人,符合作品的田园模式)在古城废墟中接近他的爱人,与她邂逅,最后,在这对恋人故事的高潮部分,与她接吻--证明了这一点。鉴于其高潮...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Founded in 1962 to further the aesthetic study of the poetry of the Victorian Period in Britain (1830–1914), Victorian Poetry publishes articles from a broad range of theoretical and critical angles, including but not confined to new historicism, feminism, and social and cultural issues. The journal has expanded its purview from the major figures of Victorian England (Tennyson, Browning, the Rossettis, etc.) to a wider compass of poets of all classes and gender identifications in nineteenth-century Britain and the Commonwealth. Victorian Poetry is edited by John B. Lamb and sponsored by the Department of English at West Virginia University.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信