Modeling and simulation analysis of current transformer based on magnetizing current as the solution variable

COMPEL Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1108/compel-07-2023-0287
Hongsen You, Mengying Gan, Dapeng Duan, Cheng Zhao, Yuan Chi, Shuai Gao, Jiansheng Yuan
{"title":"Modeling and simulation analysis of current transformer based on magnetizing current as the solution variable","authors":"Hongsen You, Mengying Gan, Dapeng Duan, Cheng Zhao, Yuan Chi, Shuai Gao, Jiansheng Yuan","doi":"10.1108/compel-07-2023-0287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to develop a model that reflects the current transformer (CT) core materials nonlinearity. The model enables simulation and analysis of the CT excitation current that includes the inductive magnetizing current and the resistive excitation current.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A nonlinear CT model is established with the magnetizing current as the solution variable. This model presents the form of a nonlinear differential equation and can be solved discretely using the Runge–Kutta method.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>By simulating variations in the excitation current for different primary currents, loads and core materials, the results demonstrate that enhancing the permeability of the <em>B</em>–<em>H</em> curve leads to a more significant improvement in the CT ratio error at low primary currents.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The proposed model has three obvious advantages over the previous models with the secondary current as the solution variable: (1) The differential equation is simpler and easier to solve. Previous models contain the time differential terms of the secondary current and excitation flux or the integral term of the flux, making the iterative solution complicated. The proposed model only contains the time differential of the magnetizing current. (2) The accuracy of the excitation current obtained by the proposed model is higher. Previous models calculate the excitation current by subtracting the secondary current from the converted primary current. Because these two currents are much greater than the excitation current, the error of calculating the small excitation current by subtracting two large numbers is greatly enlarged. (3) The proposed model can calculate the distorted waveform of the excitation current and error for any form of time-domain primary current, while previous models can only obtain the effective value.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501376,"journal":{"name":"COMPEL","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPEL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/compel-07-2023-0287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to develop a model that reflects the current transformer (CT) core materials nonlinearity. The model enables simulation and analysis of the CT excitation current that includes the inductive magnetizing current and the resistive excitation current.

Design/methodology/approach

A nonlinear CT model is established with the magnetizing current as the solution variable. This model presents the form of a nonlinear differential equation and can be solved discretely using the Runge–Kutta method.

Findings

By simulating variations in the excitation current for different primary currents, loads and core materials, the results demonstrate that enhancing the permeability of the BH curve leads to a more significant improvement in the CT ratio error at low primary currents.

Originality/value

The proposed model has three obvious advantages over the previous models with the secondary current as the solution variable: (1) The differential equation is simpler and easier to solve. Previous models contain the time differential terms of the secondary current and excitation flux or the integral term of the flux, making the iterative solution complicated. The proposed model only contains the time differential of the magnetizing current. (2) The accuracy of the excitation current obtained by the proposed model is higher. Previous models calculate the excitation current by subtracting the secondary current from the converted primary current. Because these two currents are much greater than the excitation current, the error of calculating the small excitation current by subtracting two large numbers is greatly enlarged. (3) The proposed model can calculate the distorted waveform of the excitation current and error for any form of time-domain primary current, while previous models can only obtain the effective value.

以磁化电流为解决变量的电流互感器建模和仿真分析
目的 本文旨在开发一种能够反映电流互感器 (CT) 铁芯材料非线性特性的模型。该模型可模拟和分析 CT 的励磁电流,其中包括感性磁化电流和阻性励磁电流。研究结果通过模拟不同一次电流、负载和铁芯材料下励磁电流的变化,结果表明提高 B-H 曲线的磁导率可显著改善低一次电流下的 CT 比误差。以往的模型包含二次电流和励磁磁通的时差分项或磁通的积分项,使得迭代求解变得复杂。建议的模型只包含磁化电流的时差项。(2) 拟议模型获得的励磁电流精度更高。以往的模型通过从转换后的一次电流中减去二次电流来计算励磁电流。由于这两个电流远大于励磁电流,因此通过减去两个大数来计算小励磁电流的误差会大大增加。(3) 所提出的模型可以计算任何形式时域一次电流的励磁电流畸变波形和误差,而以往的模型只能获得有效值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信