ChatGPT's potential to support home care for patients in the early period after orthopedic interventions and enhance public health.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Joint diseases and related surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2023.1402
Dilek Yapar, Yasemin Demir Avcı, Esra Tokur Sonuvar, Ömer Faruk Eğerci, Aliekber Yapar
{"title":"ChatGPT's potential to support home care for patients in the early period after orthopedic interventions and enhance public health.","authors":"Dilek Yapar, Yasemin Demir Avcı, Esra Tokur Sonuvar, Ömer Faruk Eğerci, Aliekber Yapar","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2023.1402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study presents the first investigation into the potential of ChatGPT to provide medical consultation for patients undergoing orthopedic interventions, with the primary objective of evaluating ChatGPT's effectiveness in supporting patient self-management during the essential early recovery phase at home.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seven scenarios, representative of common situations in orthopedics and traumatology, were presented to ChatGPT version 4.0 to obtain advice. These scenarios and ChatGPT̓s responses were then evaluated by 68 expert orthopedists (67 males, 1 female; mean age: 37.9±5.9 years; range, 30 to 59 years), 40 of whom had at least four years of orthopedic experience, while 28 were associate or full professors. Expert orthopedists used a rubric on a scale of 1 to 5 to evaluate ChatGPT's advice based on accuracy, applicability, comprehensiveness, and clarity. Those who gave ChatGPT a score of 4 or higher considered its performance as above average or excellent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all scenarios, the median evaluation scores were at least 4 across accuracy, applicability, comprehensiveness, and communication. As for mean scores, accuracy was the highest-rated dimension at 4.2±0.8, while mean comprehensiveness was slightly lower at 3.9±0.8. Orthopedist characteristics, such as academic title and prior use of ChatGPT, did not influence their evaluation (all p>0.05). Across all scenarios, ChatGPT demonstrated an accuracy of 79.8%, with applicability at 75.2%, comprehensiveness at 70.6%, and a 75.6% rating for communication clarity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasizes ChatGPT̓s strengths in accuracy and applicability for home care after orthopedic intervention but underscores a need for improved comprehensiveness. This focused evaluation not only sheds light on ChatGPT̓s potential in specialized medical advice but also suggests its potential to play a broader role in the advancement of public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":"169-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10746912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study presents the first investigation into the potential of ChatGPT to provide medical consultation for patients undergoing orthopedic interventions, with the primary objective of evaluating ChatGPT's effectiveness in supporting patient self-management during the essential early recovery phase at home.

Materials and methods: Seven scenarios, representative of common situations in orthopedics and traumatology, were presented to ChatGPT version 4.0 to obtain advice. These scenarios and ChatGPT̓s responses were then evaluated by 68 expert orthopedists (67 males, 1 female; mean age: 37.9±5.9 years; range, 30 to 59 years), 40 of whom had at least four years of orthopedic experience, while 28 were associate or full professors. Expert orthopedists used a rubric on a scale of 1 to 5 to evaluate ChatGPT's advice based on accuracy, applicability, comprehensiveness, and clarity. Those who gave ChatGPT a score of 4 or higher considered its performance as above average or excellent.

Results: In all scenarios, the median evaluation scores were at least 4 across accuracy, applicability, comprehensiveness, and communication. As for mean scores, accuracy was the highest-rated dimension at 4.2±0.8, while mean comprehensiveness was slightly lower at 3.9±0.8. Orthopedist characteristics, such as academic title and prior use of ChatGPT, did not influence their evaluation (all p>0.05). Across all scenarios, ChatGPT demonstrated an accuracy of 79.8%, with applicability at 75.2%, comprehensiveness at 70.6%, and a 75.6% rating for communication clarity.

Conclusion: This study emphasizes ChatGPT̓s strengths in accuracy and applicability for home care after orthopedic intervention but underscores a need for improved comprehensiveness. This focused evaluation not only sheds light on ChatGPT̓s potential in specialized medical advice but also suggests its potential to play a broader role in the advancement of public health.

ChatGPT 在支持骨科介入术后早期病人家庭护理和提高公众健康水平方面的潜力。
研究目的本研究首次探讨了 ChatGPT 为接受骨科介入治疗的患者提供医疗咨询的潜力,其主要目的是评估 ChatGPT 在支持患者在家早期恢复阶段自我管理方面的有效性:向 ChatGPT 4.0 版本展示了骨科和创伤科常见的七种情景,以获得建议。然后由 68 名骨科专家(67 名男性,1 名女性;平均年龄:37.9±5.9 岁;年龄范围:30 至 59 岁)对这些情景和 ChatGPT̓的回复进行评估,其中 40 人至少有四年的骨科经验,28 人是副教授或正教授。骨科专家根据准确性、适用性、全面性和清晰度对 ChatGPT 的建议进行了评估,评分标准为 1 至 5 分。那些给 ChatGPT 打 4 分或更高分的专家认为 ChatGPT 的表现高于平均水平或非常出色:在所有场景中,准确性、适用性、全面性和沟通方面的评价得分中位数至少为 4 分。平均分方面,准确性最高,为 4.2±0.8,全面性稍低,为 3.9±0.8。骨科医生的特征,如学术职称和之前使用 ChatGPT 的情况,并不影响他们的评价(均 p>0.05)。在所有场景中,ChatGPT 的准确率为 79.8%,适用性为 75.2%,全面性为 70.6%,交流清晰度为 75.6%:本研究强调了 ChatGPT̓在矫形手术后家庭护理的准确性和适用性方面的优势,但也强调了提高全面性的必要性。这项重点评估不仅揭示了 ChatGPT̓在专业医疗咨询方面的潜力,还表明它有可能在促进公共卫生方面发挥更广泛的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信