Antepartum Emergency Department Use and Associations with Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in a Large Hospital System.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2023-12-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2023.0072
Thwisha Sabloak, Lynn M Yee, Joe Feinglass
{"title":"Antepartum Emergency Department Use and Associations with Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in a Large Hospital System.","authors":"Thwisha Sabloak, Lynn M Yee, Joe Feinglass","doi":"10.1089/whr.2023.0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prenatal care in the United States has remained unchanged for decades, with pregnant patients often experiencing high rates of hospital emergency department (ED) visits. It is unknown how many of these ED visits are potentially preventable with better access to timely and effective outpatient or home prenatal care. This multihospital health system quality improvement study was undertaken to analyze patient risk factors for acute antepartum hospital use as well as associations with adverse maternal and neonatal birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health record and administrative data on ED visits in the 270 days before a delivery admission for alive, singleton births at nine system hospitals over 52 months. We use logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of hospital use by patient demographic and clinical characteristics and present the association of acute antepartum hospital use with maternal and neonatal birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 17.5% of 68,200 patients had antepartum ED visits, including 248 inpatient admissions, with significant variation between hospitals. As compared to non-Hispanic white patients, Hispanic and especially non-Hispanic Black and Medicaid patients had significantly higher odds of acute antepartum hospital use as did patients with preexisting conditions. Birth outcomes were significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.01) worse among individuals with antepartum hospital utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acute antepartum hospital use was concentrated among lower income, minority patients, and those with chronic conditions with significant variation across system hospitals. There is a need for research into innovations in prenatal care that are best at reaching our most vulnerable patients, reducing preventable hospital utilization, and improving birth outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"4 1","pages":"562-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10719645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2023.0072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Prenatal care in the United States has remained unchanged for decades, with pregnant patients often experiencing high rates of hospital emergency department (ED) visits. It is unknown how many of these ED visits are potentially preventable with better access to timely and effective outpatient or home prenatal care. This multihospital health system quality improvement study was undertaken to analyze patient risk factors for acute antepartum hospital use as well as associations with adverse maternal and neonatal birth outcomes.

Methods: The retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health record and administrative data on ED visits in the 270 days before a delivery admission for alive, singleton births at nine system hospitals over 52 months. We use logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of hospital use by patient demographic and clinical characteristics and present the association of acute antepartum hospital use with maternal and neonatal birth outcomes.

Results: Overall, 17.5% of 68,200 patients had antepartum ED visits, including 248 inpatient admissions, with significant variation between hospitals. As compared to non-Hispanic white patients, Hispanic and especially non-Hispanic Black and Medicaid patients had significantly higher odds of acute antepartum hospital use as did patients with preexisting conditions. Birth outcomes were significantly (p < 0.01) worse among individuals with antepartum hospital utilization.

Conclusion: Acute antepartum hospital use was concentrated among lower income, minority patients, and those with chronic conditions with significant variation across system hospitals. There is a need for research into innovations in prenatal care that are best at reaching our most vulnerable patients, reducing preventable hospital utilization, and improving birth outcomes.

一家大型医院系统的产前急诊使用情况及其与孕产妇和新生儿预后的关系。
目的:几十年来,美国的产前保健一直没有改变,孕妇经常要到医院急诊科(ED)就诊,就诊率很高。如果能更好地提供及时有效的门诊或家庭产前护理,有多少急诊就诊是可以避免的,目前还不得而知。这项多医院医疗系统质量改进研究旨在分析患者产前急性住院的风险因素以及与产妇和新生儿不良分娩结局的关联:这项回顾性队列研究分析了 52 个月内九家系统医院中单胎活产产妇入院分娩前 270 天内急诊就诊的电子健康记录和管理数据。我们使用逻辑回归法根据患者的人口统计学特征和临床特征估算了使用医院的可能性,并展示了急性产前医院使用与产妇和新生儿出生结局的关联:在 68,200 名患者中,17.5% 的患者曾在产前急诊室就诊,其中包括 248 名住院患者,不同医院之间存在显著差异。与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者,尤其是非西班牙裔黑人患者和医疗补助患者产前急诊入院的几率明显更高,原有疾病患者也是如此。分娩结果也明显不同(P急性产前住院主要集中在低收入、少数族裔和患有慢性疾病的患者中,各系统医院之间存在显著差异。有必要对产前护理的创新进行研究,这些创新最适合我们最弱势的患者,可减少可预防的医院使用率,并改善分娩结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信