Quality of New Domestic Hand Sanitizer Drug Product Manufacturers During COVID-19.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Michelle Stafford, Rachel Linck Dunn, Nirzari Gupta, Raghavi Kakarla, Douglas Kirkpatrick, Daniel Magparangalan, Diem Ngo, Connie Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Anjanette Smith, Matthew Stark, Wei Ye, Huzeyfe Yilmaz, Jeffrey Woodruff, Mary Manibusan, Neil Stiber, Alex Viehmann
{"title":"Quality of New Domestic Hand Sanitizer Drug Product Manufacturers During COVID-19.","authors":"Michelle Stafford, Rachel Linck Dunn, Nirzari Gupta, Raghavi Kakarla, Douglas Kirkpatrick, Daniel Magparangalan, Diem Ngo, Connie Gryniewicz-Ruzicka, Anjanette Smith, Matthew Stark, Wei Ye, Huzeyfe Yilmaz, Jeffrey Woodruff, Mary Manibusan, Neil Stiber, Alex Viehmann","doi":"10.1208/s12248-023-00877-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The FDA initiated a cross-sectional, statistically based sampling and testing study to characterize the quality of marketed alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS) by evaluating the alcohol content and impurities present in ABHS products manufactured by establishments that registered with the FDA during March-April 2020. A stratified sampling design divided the population of manufacturers into independent groups based on each establishment's level of experience with FDA oversight and its geographic location. ABHS products were collected and analyzed by spatially offset Raman spectroscopy and gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The GC-MS results for 310 products, from 196 newly registered domestic manufacturers, showed that 71.6% (± 5.7%) of these manufacturers had violative products. In 104 (33.5%) cases, the alcohol content did not meet label claim assay specifications but still fell within CDC efficacy ranges. Ethanol ABHS products failed more often overall (assay and impurities) (84.3%) and for impurities (84.3%), than isopropanol ABHS products (11.2% and 6.2%, respectively). Differences in test results across active ingredients were statistically significant. Ethanol ABHS products often (63.5% of cases) failed due to the presence of acetal or acetaldehyde, particularly in products with pH ≤ 6. Other impurities were also detected in several ABHS products, suggesting the use of low-grade alcohol in the manufacture of these products. Evidence was insufficient to conclude that having experience manufacturing FDA-regulated products, or lack thereof, influenced product-level violative results. This study highlights the importance of sourcing and testing active pharmaceutical ingredients to produce quality drug products.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-023-00877-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The FDA initiated a cross-sectional, statistically based sampling and testing study to characterize the quality of marketed alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS) by evaluating the alcohol content and impurities present in ABHS products manufactured by establishments that registered with the FDA during March-April 2020. A stratified sampling design divided the population of manufacturers into independent groups based on each establishment's level of experience with FDA oversight and its geographic location. ABHS products were collected and analyzed by spatially offset Raman spectroscopy and gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The GC-MS results for 310 products, from 196 newly registered domestic manufacturers, showed that 71.6% (± 5.7%) of these manufacturers had violative products. In 104 (33.5%) cases, the alcohol content did not meet label claim assay specifications but still fell within CDC efficacy ranges. Ethanol ABHS products failed more often overall (assay and impurities) (84.3%) and for impurities (84.3%), than isopropanol ABHS products (11.2% and 6.2%, respectively). Differences in test results across active ingredients were statistically significant. Ethanol ABHS products often (63.5% of cases) failed due to the presence of acetal or acetaldehyde, particularly in products with pH ≤ 6. Other impurities were also detected in several ABHS products, suggesting the use of low-grade alcohol in the manufacture of these products. Evidence was insufficient to conclude that having experience manufacturing FDA-regulated products, or lack thereof, influenced product-level violative results. This study highlights the importance of sourcing and testing active pharmaceutical ingredients to produce quality drug products.

Abstract Image

COVID-19 期间国内新洗手液药品制造商的质量。
美国食品和药物管理局启动了一项基于统计的横断面抽样和测试研究,通过评估 2020 年 3 月至 4 月期间在美国食品和药物管理局注册的企业生产的酒精洗手液 (ABHS) 产品中的酒精含量和杂质,来确定市场上销售的酒精洗手液 (ABHS) 的质量特征。分层抽样设计根据每个企业在 FDA 监督下的经验水平和地理位置,将制造商群体划分为独立的组别。通过空间偏移拉曼光谱和气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)收集和分析 ABHS 产品。来自 196 家新注册的国内制造商的 310 种产品的气相色谱-质谱分析结果显示,71.6%(± 5.7%)的制造商生产了违规产品。在 104 个(33.5%)案例中,酒精含量不符合标签声称的化验规范,但仍在疾病预防控制中心的药效范围内。乙醇 ABHS 产品总体(化验和杂质)(84.3%)和杂质(84.3%)不合格的比例高于异丙醇 ABHS 产品(分别为 11.2% 和 6.2%)。不同活性成分的检测结果差异具有统计学意义。乙醇 ABHS 产品经常(63.5% 的情况下)因存在缩醛或乙醛而不合格,尤其是 pH 值≤ 6 的产品。在几种 ABHS 产品中还检测到了其他杂质,这表明在生产这些产品时使用了劣质酒精。没有足够的证据可以得出结论说,是否具有生产 FDA 监管产品的经验会影响产品级别的违规结果。这项研究强调了采购和检测活性药物成分对生产优质药品的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信