Debiased lasso for stratified Cox models with application to the national kidney transplant data.

IF 1.3 4区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Annals of Applied Statistics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1214/23-aoas1775
Lu Xia, Bin Nan, Yi Li
{"title":"Debiased lasso for stratified Cox models with application to the national kidney transplant data.","authors":"Lu Xia, Bin Nan, Yi Li","doi":"10.1214/23-aoas1775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) system has become a rich resource for understanding the complex mechanisms of graft failure after kidney transplant, a crucial step for allocating organs effectively and implementing appropriate care. As transplant centers that treated patients might strongly confound graft failures, Cox models stratified by centers can eliminate their confounding effects. Also, since recipient age is a proven non-modifiable risk factor, a common practice is to fit models separately by recipient age groups. The moderate sample sizes, relative to the number of covariates, in some age groups may lead to biased maximum stratified partial likelihood estimates and unreliable confidence intervals even when samples still outnumber covariates. To draw reliable inference on a comprehensive list of risk factors measured from both donors and recipients in SRTR, we propose a de-biased lasso approach via quadratic programming for fitting stratified Cox models. We establish asymptotic properties and verify via simulations that our method produces consistent estimates and confidence intervals with nominal coverage probabilities. Accounting for nearly 100 confounders in SRTR, the de-biased method detects that the graft failure hazard nonlinearly increases with donor's age among all recipient age groups, and that organs from older donors more adversely impact the younger recipients. Our method also delineates the associations between graft failure and many risk factors such as recipients' primary diagnoses (e.g. polycystic disease, glomerular disease, and diabetes) and donor-recipient mismatches for human leukocyte antigen loci across recipient age groups. These results may inform the refinement of donor-recipient matching criteria for stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":50772,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Statistics","volume":"17 4","pages":"3550-3569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10720921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/23-aoas1775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) system has become a rich resource for understanding the complex mechanisms of graft failure after kidney transplant, a crucial step for allocating organs effectively and implementing appropriate care. As transplant centers that treated patients might strongly confound graft failures, Cox models stratified by centers can eliminate their confounding effects. Also, since recipient age is a proven non-modifiable risk factor, a common practice is to fit models separately by recipient age groups. The moderate sample sizes, relative to the number of covariates, in some age groups may lead to biased maximum stratified partial likelihood estimates and unreliable confidence intervals even when samples still outnumber covariates. To draw reliable inference on a comprehensive list of risk factors measured from both donors and recipients in SRTR, we propose a de-biased lasso approach via quadratic programming for fitting stratified Cox models. We establish asymptotic properties and verify via simulations that our method produces consistent estimates and confidence intervals with nominal coverage probabilities. Accounting for nearly 100 confounders in SRTR, the de-biased method detects that the graft failure hazard nonlinearly increases with donor's age among all recipient age groups, and that organs from older donors more adversely impact the younger recipients. Our method also delineates the associations between graft failure and many risk factors such as recipients' primary diagnoses (e.g. polycystic disease, glomerular disease, and diabetes) and donor-recipient mismatches for human leukocyte antigen loci across recipient age groups. These results may inform the refinement of donor-recipient matching criteria for stakeholders.

分层 Cox 模型的去偏套索,并应用于全国肾移植数据。
移植受者科学登记(SRTR)系统已成为了解肾移植后移植物失败复杂机制的丰富资源,是有效分配器官和实施适当护理的关键一步。由于治疗患者的移植中心可能会对移植物失败造成很大的混淆,因此按中心分层的 Cox 模型可以消除其混淆效应。此外,由于受者年龄是一个已被证实的不可改变的风险因素,通常的做法是按受者年龄组别分别拟合模型。相对于协变量的数量而言,某些年龄组的样本量适中,这可能会导致最大分层偏似然估计值出现偏差,即使样本数量仍然多于协变量,置信区间也不可靠。为了可靠地推断 SRTR 中从供体和受体测得的综合风险因素列表,我们提出了一种通过二次编程拟合分层 Cox 模型的去偏 lasso 方法。我们建立了渐近特性,并通过模拟验证了我们的方法能产生具有名义覆盖概率的一致估计值和置信区间。考虑到 SRTR 中的近 100 个混杂因素,去偏倚方法发现,在所有受体年龄组中,移植物失败的危险随捐献者年龄的增加而非线性增加,而且年龄较大的捐献者的器官对年龄较小的受体的不利影响更大。我们的方法还划分了移植物失败与许多风险因素之间的关系,如受体的主要诊断(如多囊性疾病、肾小球疾病和糖尿病)以及不同受体年龄组的人类白细胞抗原位点的供体-受体不匹配。这些结果可为完善利益相关者的供体-受体匹配标准提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Applied Statistics
Annals of Applied Statistics 社会科学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical research spans an enormous range from direct subject-matter collaborations to pure mathematical theory. The Annals of Applied Statistics, the newest journal from the IMS, is aimed at papers in the applied half of this range. Published quarterly in both print and electronic form, our goal is to provide a timely and unified forum for all areas of applied statistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信