Advances in the clinical use of patient-reported outcomes in thoracic surgery.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001326
Patrick Bou-Samra, Peter J Kneuertz
{"title":"Advances in the clinical use of patient-reported outcomes in thoracic surgery.","authors":"Patrick Bou-Samra, Peter J Kneuertz","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly recognized as a clinical tool for measuring and improving patient-centric care. This review provides a summary on recent advances in the use of PROs in the field of thoracic surgery.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>PROs have been used as primary endpoints in clinical trials and observational studies evaluating clinical care pathways and quantifying the benefits of minimally invasive surgical techniques for patients undergoing lung surgery. Qualitative and quantitative research has yielded fundamental insights into which PRO domains are meaningful and valued by patients after lung surgery. Patient experience and recovery after esophagectomy have been further characterized by using PROs. New disease-specific survey tools for patients have been developed to track long-term symptoms after esophageal reconstruction. Patient satisfaction has emerged as the key metric used to gauge the patient centeredness of hospital systems.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Advances have been made in the application of PROs in multiple areas of thoracic surgery, which include lung and esophageal surgery. The growing focus on the use of PROs in clinical pathways has led to a better understanding on how to optimize patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly recognized as a clinical tool for measuring and improving patient-centric care. This review provides a summary on recent advances in the use of PROs in the field of thoracic surgery.

Recent findings: PROs have been used as primary endpoints in clinical trials and observational studies evaluating clinical care pathways and quantifying the benefits of minimally invasive surgical techniques for patients undergoing lung surgery. Qualitative and quantitative research has yielded fundamental insights into which PRO domains are meaningful and valued by patients after lung surgery. Patient experience and recovery after esophagectomy have been further characterized by using PROs. New disease-specific survey tools for patients have been developed to track long-term symptoms after esophageal reconstruction. Patient satisfaction has emerged as the key metric used to gauge the patient centeredness of hospital systems.

Summary: Advances have been made in the application of PROs in multiple areas of thoracic surgery, which include lung and esophageal surgery. The growing focus on the use of PROs in clinical pathways has led to a better understanding on how to optimize patient experience.

胸外科患者报告结果的临床应用进展。
审查目的:患者报告结果(PROs)越来越被认为是衡量和改善以患者为中心的护理的临床工具。本综述总结了近期在胸外科领域使用PROs的进展情况:在评估临床护理路径和量化微创手术技术对肺部手术患者益处的临床试验和观察性研究中,PROs 已被用作主要终点。定性和定量研究已就肺部手术后哪些PRO领域对患者有意义和有价值提出了基本见解。食管切除术后患者的经历和恢复情况也通过使用 PROs 得到了进一步的描述。新开发的针对特定疾病的患者调查工具可用于跟踪食管重建术后的长期症状。患者满意度已成为衡量医院系统是否以患者为中心的关键指标。摘要:PROs 在胸外科多个领域(包括肺部和食管外科)的应用已取得进展。人们越来越重视在临床路径中使用PROs,从而更好地了解了如何优化患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信