Complete stent graft relining of the hemodialysis access circuit for access salvage.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1177/11297298231205006
Shimon Aronhime, Shmuel Balan, Alexei Cherniavsky, Yaniv Avital
{"title":"Complete stent graft relining of the hemodialysis access circuit for access salvage.","authors":"Shimon Aronhime, Shmuel Balan, Alexei Cherniavsky, Yaniv Avital","doi":"10.1177/11297298231205006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stent grafts (SGs) are widely used in hemodialysis access procedures to maintain function and patency of the access circuit. There are no reports to date describing complete relining of the access circuit with SGs for extreme access salvage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report outcomes and experience with complete SG relining of the hemodialysis access circuit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April 2020 to May 2023, all hemodialysis salvage procedures that included complete relining of the access circuit with SGs were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively collected database of 970 hemodialysis access interventions. SGs were placed for various pathologies including residual stenosis, perforation, aneurysm, and thrombosis. Follow up outcomes included primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 patients were included in the study. Average stented length was 30 cm. Average follow up was 283 days (range 38-647 days). The primary patency of the entire covered segment was 80% and 68% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The primary assisted patency of the segment was 88% and 77% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Secondary patency of the access circuit was 94% at both 6 and 12 months. There were no issues with SG cannulation and zero cases of SG fracture or infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Salvage of failing hemodialysis access circuits by complete SG relining should be considered for a limited subgroup of patients where the access circuit would otherwise be deemed unsalvageable. Complete SG relining has both good immediate outcomes and 6- and 12-month patency rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"144-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231205006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stent grafts (SGs) are widely used in hemodialysis access procedures to maintain function and patency of the access circuit. There are no reports to date describing complete relining of the access circuit with SGs for extreme access salvage.

Objective: To report outcomes and experience with complete SG relining of the hemodialysis access circuit.

Methods: From April 2020 to May 2023, all hemodialysis salvage procedures that included complete relining of the access circuit with SGs were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively collected database of 970 hemodialysis access interventions. SGs were placed for various pathologies including residual stenosis, perforation, aneurysm, and thrombosis. Follow up outcomes included primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency.

Results: A total of 16 patients were included in the study. Average stented length was 30 cm. Average follow up was 283 days (range 38-647 days). The primary patency of the entire covered segment was 80% and 68% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The primary assisted patency of the segment was 88% and 77% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Secondary patency of the access circuit was 94% at both 6 and 12 months. There were no issues with SG cannulation and zero cases of SG fracture or infection.

Conclusions: Salvage of failing hemodialysis access circuits by complete SG relining should be considered for a limited subgroup of patients where the access circuit would otherwise be deemed unsalvageable. Complete SG relining has both good immediate outcomes and 6- and 12-month patency rates.

对血液透析通路进行完全支架移植再衬垫,以挽救通路。
背景:支架移植物(SG)被广泛应用于血液透析通路手术中,以保持通路的功能和通畅。迄今为止,还没有关于使用 SG 完全重新连接通路以挽救极端通路的报道:报告血液透析通路完全用 SG 重衬的结果和经验:从 2020 年 4 月到 2023 年 5 月,我们对前瞻性收集的 970 例血液透析通路介入治疗数据库中所有包括使用 SG 完全重新连接通路的血液透析挽救手术进行了回顾性分析。放置 SG 的病因多种多样,包括残余狭窄、穿孔、动脉瘤和血栓形成。随访结果包括原发性通畅、原发性辅助通畅和继发性通畅:共有 16 名患者参与了研究。平均支架长度为 30 厘米。平均随访 283 天(38-647 天不等)。在 6 个月和 12 个月时,整个覆盖区段的主要通畅率分别为 80% 和 68%。在 6 个月和 12 个月时,该段的主要辅助通畅率分别为 88% 和 77%。在 6 个月和 12 个月时,通路的二次通畅率均为 94%。SG插管没有问题,SG骨折或感染病例为零:结论:对于少数血液透析通路无法挽救的患者,应考虑通过完全重置 SG 来挽救衰竭的血液透析通路。完整的 SG 重置术具有良好的即刻效果以及 6 个月和 12 个月的通畅率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信