COVID-19, Mental Health, and Mental Health Treatment among Adults.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Samuel H Zuvekas
{"title":"COVID-19, Mental Health, and Mental Health Treatment among Adults.","authors":"Samuel H Zuvekas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has been widely reported to have increased symptoms of anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues. It may also have significantly disrupted continuity of treatment for existing patients and made access for those newly seeking care more difficult at a time when treatment needs are higher.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>This study seeks to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health status and mental health treatment among adults residing in the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data are drawn from the 2019-2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative household survey of the U.S. civilian non-institutionalized population conducted annually since 1996 and used extensively to study mental health treatment in the U.S. I examine unadjusted and regression-adjusted differences between 2019 and 2020 in perceived mental health status (excellent, very good, good, fair, poor) and in the K6 general psychological distress, the PHQ-2 depression screener, and the VR-12 mental component summary score. Similarly, using the detailed MEPS data on health care encounters and prescription drug fills, I examine differences in mental health use treatment between 2019 and 2020. I focus specifically on changes in continuity of treatment among those already in treatment in January and February, before the pandemic fully struck, as well differences in the initiation of new episodes of treatment after the pandemic began.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four mental health scales included in the MEPS show statistically significant declines in mental health between 2019 and 2020, particularly among younger adults. On balance, the percentage of US adults receiving mental health treatment did not change significantly. Continuity of treatment increased slightly in 2020, with 87.1% of adults in treatment January or February still receiving care in the second quarter, an increase of 2.5 percentage points (p=.025). However, there were significant declines in the initiation of new episodes of treatment, especially in the second quarter of 2020.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While the continuity of treatment among adults already in care when the COVID pandemic first led to nationwide disruptions is welcome news, the decline in new episodes of mental health treatment among those not previously treated is of great concern. In a time of heightened need, the gap between need and treatment likely grew larger. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Continued long-term monitoring of the mental health needs and treatment gaps will be important, especially as many emergency measures designed to mitigate the effects of the pandemic on access to mental health treatment expire.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"26 4","pages":"159-183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been widely reported to have increased symptoms of anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues. It may also have significantly disrupted continuity of treatment for existing patients and made access for those newly seeking care more difficult at a time when treatment needs are higher.

Aims of the study: This study seeks to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health status and mental health treatment among adults residing in the U.S. civilian, non-institutionalized population.

Methods: The data are drawn from the 2019-2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative household survey of the U.S. civilian non-institutionalized population conducted annually since 1996 and used extensively to study mental health treatment in the U.S. I examine unadjusted and regression-adjusted differences between 2019 and 2020 in perceived mental health status (excellent, very good, good, fair, poor) and in the K6 general psychological distress, the PHQ-2 depression screener, and the VR-12 mental component summary score. Similarly, using the detailed MEPS data on health care encounters and prescription drug fills, I examine differences in mental health use treatment between 2019 and 2020. I focus specifically on changes in continuity of treatment among those already in treatment in January and February, before the pandemic fully struck, as well differences in the initiation of new episodes of treatment after the pandemic began.

Results: All four mental health scales included in the MEPS show statistically significant declines in mental health between 2019 and 2020, particularly among younger adults. On balance, the percentage of US adults receiving mental health treatment did not change significantly. Continuity of treatment increased slightly in 2020, with 87.1% of adults in treatment January or February still receiving care in the second quarter, an increase of 2.5 percentage points (p=.025). However, there were significant declines in the initiation of new episodes of treatment, especially in the second quarter of 2020.

Discussion: While the continuity of treatment among adults already in care when the COVID pandemic first led to nationwide disruptions is welcome news, the decline in new episodes of mental health treatment among those not previously treated is of great concern. In a time of heightened need, the gap between need and treatment likely grew larger. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Continued long-term monitoring of the mental health needs and treatment gaps will be important, especially as many emergency measures designed to mitigate the effects of the pandemic on access to mental health treatment expire.

COVID-19、心理健康和成人心理健康治疗。
背景:据广泛报道,COVID-19 大流行增加了焦虑、抑郁和其他心理健康问题的症状。它还可能严重扰乱了现有患者治疗的连续性,并使新求医者在治疗需求较高时更难获得治疗:本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行对美国非住院成年人的心理健康状况和心理健康治疗的影响:数据来自 2019-2020 年医疗支出小组调查(MEPS),这是一项自 1996 年以来每年对美国平民非机构化人口进行的具有全国代表性的家庭调查,被广泛用于研究美国的心理健康治疗。我研究了 2019 年和 2020 年之间感知到的心理健康状况(极好、很好、好、一般、差)以及 K6 一般心理困扰、PHQ-2 抑郁筛查器和 VR-12 心理成分总分的未调整和回归调整差异。同样,我利用 MEPS 关于医疗保健就诊和处方药填写的详细数据,研究了 2019 年和 2020 年之间心理健康使用治疗方面的差异。我特别关注在大流行病全面爆发前的 1 月和 2 月已经接受治疗的人在治疗连续性方面的变化,以及在大流行病开始后开始新一轮治疗的差异:MEPS包含的所有四个心理健康量表均显示,2019年至2020年期间,心理健康水平在统计学上有显著下降,尤其是在年轻成年人中。总的来说,接受心理健康治疗的美国成年人的比例没有显著变化。治疗的持续性在 2020 年略有增加,1 月或 2 月接受治疗的成年人中有 87.1%在第二季度仍在接受治疗,增加了 2.5 个百分点(p=.025)。然而,开始新一轮治疗的人数明显减少,尤其是在 2020 年第二季度:在 COVID 大流行首次导致全国性混乱时,已经接受治疗的成年人继续接受治疗是一个值得欢迎的消息,但那些以前未接受过治疗的人的精神健康治疗的新发病率下降则令人十分担忧。在需求增加的时候,需求与治疗之间的差距可能会越来越大。对医疗服务的提供和使用的影响,以及对医疗政策的影响:继续对精神健康需求和治疗差距进行长期监测将是非常重要的,尤其是当许多旨在减轻大流行病对精神健康治疗影响的紧急措施到期时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信