Knowledge, attitude and practice survey of bacterial contamination of blood for transfusion in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-17 DOI:10.2450/BloodTransfus.586
Anne-Sophie Heroes, Paul Kabamba, Aimée Luyindula, Bernard Bongenya, Pierre Nzazi, Monica Nasali, Cathérine Akele, Marie-Paule Lusinga, John Ekofo, José Coene, Inge Van Cauwenberg, Philippe Vandekerckhove, Octavie Lunguya, Jan Jacobs
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude and practice survey of bacterial contamination of blood for transfusion in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.","authors":"Anne-Sophie Heroes, Paul Kabamba, Aimée Luyindula, Bernard Bongenya, Pierre Nzazi, Monica Nasali, Cathérine Akele, Marie-Paule Lusinga, John Ekofo, José Coene, Inge Van Cauwenberg, Philippe Vandekerckhove, Octavie Lunguya, Jan Jacobs","doi":"10.2450/BloodTransfus.586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We assessed healthcare worker's knowledge-attitude-practice regarding bacterial contamination of blood products in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In three hospitals and the National Blood Transfusion Center (NBTC), two multiple-choice surveys were completed on a tablet computer: one each, for blood bank (31 questions) and for clinical ward staff (20 questions). A score was calculated for 11 overlapping knowledge questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 247 participants (blood bank No.=62, ward No.=185), median (range) knowledge score was 10 (2-19) on a maximum of 20, with blood bank staff (12/20) scoring higher than clinical ward staff (9/20) (p<0.0001). Half (50.2%) of 247 participants recalled previous training in transfusion medicine. Participants had limited understanding of and compliance with NBTC-recommended preventive measures: incorrect assumption that wearing gloves prevents bacterial contamination (83.8%) and that blood banks test donor blood for bacteria (59.9%). Half (50.0%) of blood bank staff did not acknowledge the NBTC-recommended antisepsis procedure, 62.1% did not apply the appropriate number of antisepsis steps, and 32.3% saw no harm in touching the venipuncture site after antisepsis. Presence of bacteria on healthy skin (62.3%) and blood bank fomites (examination gloves: 30.8%, soap: 62.8%) was underestimated. Although 92.4% of clinical ward staff said to easily recognize transfusion reactions, only 15.7% recognized septic reactions and post-transfusion antibiotic treatment practices were not consistent. Challenges reported by blood bank staff and particular for low-resource settings were: frequent power cuts (98.4%), transport of blood products by patient attendants (41.1%), without cooling elements (64.4%), and reuse of finished antiseptic/disinfectant containers (75.4%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present study points to gaps in knowledge, attitudes, practices along sampling, cold chain and transfusion which can feed customized training and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":49260,"journal":{"name":"Blood Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"213-225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We assessed healthcare worker's knowledge-attitude-practice regarding bacterial contamination of blood products in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Materials and methods: In three hospitals and the National Blood Transfusion Center (NBTC), two multiple-choice surveys were completed on a tablet computer: one each, for blood bank (31 questions) and for clinical ward staff (20 questions). A score was calculated for 11 overlapping knowledge questions.

Results: Among 247 participants (blood bank No.=62, ward No.=185), median (range) knowledge score was 10 (2-19) on a maximum of 20, with blood bank staff (12/20) scoring higher than clinical ward staff (9/20) (p<0.0001). Half (50.2%) of 247 participants recalled previous training in transfusion medicine. Participants had limited understanding of and compliance with NBTC-recommended preventive measures: incorrect assumption that wearing gloves prevents bacterial contamination (83.8%) and that blood banks test donor blood for bacteria (59.9%). Half (50.0%) of blood bank staff did not acknowledge the NBTC-recommended antisepsis procedure, 62.1% did not apply the appropriate number of antisepsis steps, and 32.3% saw no harm in touching the venipuncture site after antisepsis. Presence of bacteria on healthy skin (62.3%) and blood bank fomites (examination gloves: 30.8%, soap: 62.8%) was underestimated. Although 92.4% of clinical ward staff said to easily recognize transfusion reactions, only 15.7% recognized septic reactions and post-transfusion antibiotic treatment practices were not consistent. Challenges reported by blood bank staff and particular for low-resource settings were: frequent power cuts (98.4%), transport of blood products by patient attendants (41.1%), without cooling elements (64.4%), and reuse of finished antiseptic/disinfectant containers (75.4%).

Discussion: The present study points to gaps in knowledge, attitudes, practices along sampling, cold chain and transfusion which can feed customized training and monitoring.

刚果民主共和国输血细菌污染的知识、态度和实践调查。
背景:我们对刚果民主共和国医护人员在血液制品细菌污染方面的知识-态度-实践进行了评估:在三家医院和国家输血中心(NBTC),通过平板电脑完成了两项选择题调查:血库(31 道题)和临床病房工作人员(20 道题)。对 11 个重叠的知识问题进行了评分:在 247 名参与者(血库人数=62,病房人数=185)中,知识得分的中位数(范围)为 10(2-19)分,最高分为 20 分,血库工作人员(12/20)的得分高于临床病房工作人员(9/20)(讨论:本研究指出了在采样、冷链和输血的知识、态度和实践方面存在的差距,可为定制培训和监测提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Blood Transfusion welcomes international submissions of Original Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports and Letters on all the fields related to Transfusion Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信