Factors related to patients' perception of feeling safe in pre-hospital emergencies: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Juan-Antonio Péculo-Carrasco, Hugo-José Rodríguez-Ruiz, Antonio Puerta-Córdoba, José-Manuel de la Fuente-Rodríguez, Mónica Rodríguez-Bouza, Inmaculada Failde
{"title":"Factors related to patients' perception of feeling safe in pre-hospital emergencies: a multicenter cross-sectional study.","authors":"Juan-Antonio Péculo-Carrasco, Hugo-José Rodríguez-Ruiz, Antonio Puerta-Córdoba, José-Manuel de la Fuente-Rodríguez, Mónica Rodríguez-Bouza, Inmaculada Failde","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify factors related to patients' feeling of safety during prehospital emergencies.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Descriptive, multicenter cross-sectional study in the context of \"061\" emergency response services of Andalusia, Spain. Data were collected from April 2021 to March 2022. Patients attended and transported by emergency responders were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they were minors or in an altered state of consciousness, or had cognitive impairment or any barrier to communication. We calculated that a minimum sample size of 644 patients would be required. The outcome variable was the score on a 16-item scale of patient-perceived safety (ESP16, as abbreviated in Spanish). Sociodemographic, emergency service response, patient, and hospital transfer variables were studied in relation to ESP16 score. We also collected patient safety incident reports. Multivariate linear regression was used to analyze associations between the independent variables and the dependent outcome variable. Guidelines for Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 1756 responses. The mean (SD) ESP16 score was 77.7 (5.6); the median score was 80. The β􀀃 coefficients derived from the linear regression model were as follows for the variables associated with the ESP16 score: 2.799 (P .001) for satisfaction; -6.097 (P .001) for incident reports of errors, falls, harm, or injury; -2.742 (P .001) for reports of any other incident during attendance; 2.538 (P = .001) for use of the transport protocol; 1.157 (P .001) for type of emergency transport used; 0.726 (P = .014) for a cardiology diagnosis; and 1.195 (P = .003) for pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' perception of safety is very high, as reflected by level of satisfaction, incident reports, use of a transport protocol, means of transport used, diagnosis, and pain level.</p>","PeriodicalId":93987,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify factors related to patients' feeling of safety during prehospital emergencies.

Material and methods: Descriptive, multicenter cross-sectional study in the context of "061" emergency response services of Andalusia, Spain. Data were collected from April 2021 to March 2022. Patients attended and transported by emergency responders were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they were minors or in an altered state of consciousness, or had cognitive impairment or any barrier to communication. We calculated that a minimum sample size of 644 patients would be required. The outcome variable was the score on a 16-item scale of patient-perceived safety (ESP16, as abbreviated in Spanish). Sociodemographic, emergency service response, patient, and hospital transfer variables were studied in relation to ESP16 score. We also collected patient safety incident reports. Multivariate linear regression was used to analyze associations between the independent variables and the dependent outcome variable. Guidelines for Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) were followed.

Results: We received 1756 responses. The mean (SD) ESP16 score was 77.7 (5.6); the median score was 80. The β􀀃 coefficients derived from the linear regression model were as follows for the variables associated with the ESP16 score: 2.799 (P .001) for satisfaction; -6.097 (P .001) for incident reports of errors, falls, harm, or injury; -2.742 (P .001) for reports of any other incident during attendance; 2.538 (P = .001) for use of the transport protocol; 1.157 (P .001) for type of emergency transport used; 0.726 (P = .014) for a cardiology diagnosis; and 1.195 (P = .003) for pain intensity.

Conclusion: Patients' perception of safety is very high, as reflected by level of satisfaction, incident reports, use of a transport protocol, means of transport used, diagnosis, and pain level.

院前急救中患者安全感的相关因素:一项多中心横断面研究。
目的确定院前急救期间患者安全感的相关因素:在西班牙安达卢西亚 "061 "急救服务范围内进行描述性多中心横断面研究。数据收集时间为 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月。由急救人员接诊和转运的患者均可纳入研究范围。如果患者是未成年人或处于意识改变状态,或有认知障碍或任何交流障碍,则排除在外。根据我们的计算,样本量至少需要 644 名患者。结果变量是患者安全感 16 项量表(ESP16,西班牙语缩写)的得分。我们还研究了社会人口学、急救服务响应、患者和转院等变量与 ESP16 评分的关系。我们还收集了患者安全事件报告。采用多变量线性回归分析自变量与因果结果变量之间的关系。研究遵循《加强流行病学观察性研究报告指南》(STROBE):我们收到了 1756 份回复。ESP16得分的平均值(标清)为77.7(5.6);中位数为80。线性回归模型得出的与 ESP16 评分相关的变量的 β􀀃 cofficient 如下:满意度为 2.799 (P .001) ;错误、跌倒、伤害或受伤事件报告为 -6.097 (P .001) ;其他任何事件报告为 -2.742 (P .001);转运协议的使用为 2.538(P = .001);使用的紧急转运类型为 1.157(P .001);心脏科诊断为 0.726(P = .014);疼痛强度为 1.195(P = .003):从满意度、事故报告、转运协议的使用、使用的转运方式、诊断和疼痛程度等方面来看,患者对安全的感知非常高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信