Early versus late removal of the I-Gel in paediatric patients with mild upper respiratory tract symptoms undergoing ambulatory ilioinguinal surgery: A prospective observational study.
{"title":"Early versus late removal of the I-Gel in paediatric patients with mild upper respiratory tract symptoms undergoing ambulatory ilioinguinal surgery: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Anouar Jarraya, Manel Kammoun, Hasna Bouchaira, Khadija Ben Ayed, Hend Ketata","doi":"10.1177/17504589231211445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal timing of I-Gel removal in children with mild respiratory symptoms remains controversial. Consequently, we tried to assess the impact of early versus late I-Gel removal on the incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events among children aged one to five years undergoing ambulatory surgery under general anaesthesia with I-Gel airway ventilation. The anaesthesia protocol was the same for all patients. Children were divided into two groups according to the approach of I-Gel removal (early versus late). The incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events after the I-Gel removal was the main outcome, and a multivariable regression was performed to investigate the implication of the I-Gel removal in perioperative respiratory adverse events. According to our study, the incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events was not correlated to the timing of I-Gel removal. However, prolonged postoperative oxygen support can be seen when the I-Gel is removed in anaesthetized children.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589231211445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The optimal timing of I-Gel removal in children with mild respiratory symptoms remains controversial. Consequently, we tried to assess the impact of early versus late I-Gel removal on the incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events among children aged one to five years undergoing ambulatory surgery under general anaesthesia with I-Gel airway ventilation. The anaesthesia protocol was the same for all patients. Children were divided into two groups according to the approach of I-Gel removal (early versus late). The incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events after the I-Gel removal was the main outcome, and a multivariable regression was performed to investigate the implication of the I-Gel removal in perioperative respiratory adverse events. According to our study, the incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events was not correlated to the timing of I-Gel removal. However, prolonged postoperative oxygen support can be seen when the I-Gel is removed in anaesthetized children.
对有轻微上呼吸道症状的儿科患者进行非卧床髂腹股沟手术时,早期取出 I 型凝胶与晚期取出 I 型凝胶的对比:前瞻性观察研究。
对于有轻微呼吸道症状的儿童,取出 I 型凝胶的最佳时机仍存在争议。因此,我们试图评估在使用I-Gel气道通气的全身麻醉下接受非卧床手术的1至5岁儿童中,早期取出I-Gel与晚期取出I-Gel对围手术期呼吸系统不良事件发生率的影响。所有患者的麻醉方案相同。根据移除I-凝胶的方法(早期与晚期)将儿童分为两组。研究的主要结果是取出I-Gel后围手术期呼吸系统不良事件的发生率,并进行了多变量回归以研究取出I-Gel对围手术期呼吸系统不良事件的影响。根据我们的研究,围手术期呼吸系统不良事件的发生率与移除I-凝胶的时间无关。不过,麻醉患儿移除 I 型凝胶后,术后供氧时间会延长。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.