[International exchange program for anesthesia nursing students : Retrospective analysis of sustainable evaluation criteria].

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tilmann Müller-Wolff, John McDonough, Katherine Meuti, Ryan Shores, Denise Schindele
{"title":"[International exchange program for anesthesia nursing students : Retrospective analysis of sustainable evaluation criteria].","authors":"Tilmann Müller-Wolff, John McDonough, Katherine Meuti, Ryan Shores, Denise Schindele","doi":"10.1007/s00063-023-01096-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Anesthesia nursing students have little contact with relevant global contexts of their professional practice and health care as a whole. An international exchange program between a German postgraduate institution and a US university focuses on this global perspective and provides insights into each other's healthcare systems. The article offers insight into a successful international exchange program and analyzes possible evaluation criteria for the program.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of program implementation at both institutions, evaluations conducted to date, and exchange experiences that have taken place is conducted. From this, possible quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 student exchange trips and 7 reciprocal faculty visits were recorded as part of the program. Over the 6‑year period analyzed, a total of 15 clinical institutions were recruited for job shadowing. Additional outcomes included joint scientific projects and publications (contributions to journals and congresses).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The structured goal setting and operationalization of an international cooperation are helpful for the later analysis of its success. In the example described, anesthesia nursing students, faculty, and the participating institutions benefited from the international exchange program. From this, quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria could be identified and described for future use for international exchange of anesthesia nursing students.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-023-01096-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Anesthesia nursing students have little contact with relevant global contexts of their professional practice and health care as a whole. An international exchange program between a German postgraduate institution and a US university focuses on this global perspective and provides insights into each other's healthcare systems. The article offers insight into a successful international exchange program and analyzes possible evaluation criteria for the program.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of program implementation at both institutions, evaluations conducted to date, and exchange experiences that have taken place is conducted. From this, possible quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria were identified.

Results: A total of 13 student exchange trips and 7 reciprocal faculty visits were recorded as part of the program. Over the 6‑year period analyzed, a total of 15 clinical institutions were recruited for job shadowing. Additional outcomes included joint scientific projects and publications (contributions to journals and congresses).

Discussion and conclusion: The structured goal setting and operationalization of an international cooperation are helpful for the later analysis of its success. In the example described, anesthesia nursing students, faculty, and the participating institutions benefited from the international exchange program. From this, quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria could be identified and described for future use for international exchange of anesthesia nursing students.

[麻醉护理专业学生国际交流项目 :可持续评估标准的回顾性分析]。
背景和目的:麻醉护理专业的学生很少接触到与其专业实践和整个医疗保健相关的全球背景。德国一所研究生院和美国一所大学之间的国际交流项目关注这一全球视角,并提供对彼此医疗保健系统的深入了解。文章对一个成功的国际交流项目进行了深入分析,并分析了该项目可能的评估标准:材料和方法:文章对两所院校的项目实施情况、迄今为止进行的评估以及已经发生的交流经验进行了回顾性分析。材料和方法:对两所院校的项目实施情况和迄今为止进行的评估以及交流经历进行了回顾性分析,并由此确定了可能的定量和定性评估标准:结果:作为计划的一部分,共记录了 13 次学生交流旅行和 7 次教师互访。在分析的 6 年时间里,共有 15 家临床机构参与了工作实习。其他成果包括联合科学项目和出版物(向期刊和大会投稿):讨论和结论:有条理地设定目标和实施国际合作有助于日后分析其成功与否。在上述例子中,麻醉护理专业的学生、教师和参与机构都从国际交流项目中受益。由此,可以确定和描述定量和定性的评估标准,以便今后用于麻醉护理学生的国际交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信