Eliminating Algorithmic Racial Bias in Clinical Decision Support Algorithms: Use Cases from the Veterans Health Administration.

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2023-11-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2023.0037
Justin M List, Paul Palevsky, Suzanne Tamang, Susan Crowley, David Au, William C Yarbrough, Amol S Navathe, Craig Kreisler, Ravi B Parikh, Jessica Wang-Rodriguez, J Stacey Klutts, Paul Conlin, Leonard Pogach, Esther Meerwijk, Ernest Moy
{"title":"Eliminating Algorithmic Racial Bias in Clinical Decision Support Algorithms: Use Cases from the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Justin M List, Paul Palevsky, Suzanne Tamang, Susan Crowley, David Au, William C Yarbrough, Amol S Navathe, Craig Kreisler, Ravi B Parikh, Jessica Wang-Rodriguez, J Stacey Klutts, Paul Conlin, Leonard Pogach, Esther Meerwijk, Ernest Moy","doi":"10.1089/heq.2023.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Veterans Health Administration uses equity- and evidence-based principles to examine, correct, and eliminate use of potentially biased clinical equations and predictive models. We discuss the processes, successes, challenges, and next steps in four examples. We detail elimination of the race modifier for estimated kidney function and discuss steps to achieve more equitable pulmonary function testing measurement. We detail the use of equity lenses in two predictive clinical modeling tools: Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Mitigation (STORM) and Care Assessment Need (CAN) predictive models. We conclude with consideration of ways to advance racial health equity in clinical decision support algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"7 1","pages":"809-816"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10698768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2023.0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Veterans Health Administration uses equity- and evidence-based principles to examine, correct, and eliminate use of potentially biased clinical equations and predictive models. We discuss the processes, successes, challenges, and next steps in four examples. We detail elimination of the race modifier for estimated kidney function and discuss steps to achieve more equitable pulmonary function testing measurement. We detail the use of equity lenses in two predictive clinical modeling tools: Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Mitigation (STORM) and Care Assessment Need (CAN) predictive models. We conclude with consideration of ways to advance racial health equity in clinical decision support algorithms.

消除临床决策支持算法中的种族偏见:退伍军人健康管理局的使用案例。
退伍军人健康管理局采用公平和循证原则来检查、纠正和消除使用可能存在偏见的临床方程和预测模型。我们通过四个实例讨论了这一过程、成功、挑战和下一步措施。我们详细介绍了取消估计肾功能种族修饰符的情况,并讨论了实现更公平的肺功能测试测量的步骤。我们详细介绍了在两个预测性临床建模工具中使用公平透镜的情况:阿片类药物风险缓解分层工具 (STORM) 和护理评估需求 (CAN) 预测模型。最后,我们将探讨如何在临床决策支持算法中促进种族健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信