{"title":"Rural and urban differences in disparities in substance use and substance use disorders affecting sexual minority populations","authors":"Christina Dyar PhD, Ethan Morgan PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sexual minority populations are at elevated risk for substance use (SU) and substance use disorders (SUD) compared to heterosexual populations. These disparities are theorized to be amplified for rural sexual minority populations due to their increased exposure to minority stress and reduced access to sexual minority communities. However, there is a lack of research examining differences in SU disparities affecting sexual minority populations by urbanicity, and little research has examined differences in SUD treatment utilization by sexual minority status or urbanicity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We utilized data from 2015 to 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to examine disparities in SU, SUD, SUD treatment utilization, and unmet SUD treatment need between sexual minority and heterosexual populations and test whether such disparities vary by urbanicity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results indicate that disparities in SU and SUD affecting sexual minority populations generalize across urbanicities. A subset of disparities differed by urbanicity, and the direction of these differences varied, with some disparities being stronger in urban than rural populations and vice versa. Despite elevated treatment utilization among some sexual minority groups, disparities in unmet SUD treatment need were prevalent across urbanicities and sexual identity groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Study findings highlight the ubiquity of disparities in SU, SUD, and unmet SUD treatment need affecting rural and urban sexual minority populations, while also demonstrating nuanced differences in disparities by urbanicity. The persistence of disparities in unmet SUD treatment need emphasizes the need for future research to identify factors contributing to this disparity and for policies that alleviate these disparities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12816","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Sexual minority populations are at elevated risk for substance use (SU) and substance use disorders (SUD) compared to heterosexual populations. These disparities are theorized to be amplified for rural sexual minority populations due to their increased exposure to minority stress and reduced access to sexual minority communities. However, there is a lack of research examining differences in SU disparities affecting sexual minority populations by urbanicity, and little research has examined differences in SUD treatment utilization by sexual minority status or urbanicity.
Methods
We utilized data from 2015 to 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to examine disparities in SU, SUD, SUD treatment utilization, and unmet SUD treatment need between sexual minority and heterosexual populations and test whether such disparities vary by urbanicity.
Results
Results indicate that disparities in SU and SUD affecting sexual minority populations generalize across urbanicities. A subset of disparities differed by urbanicity, and the direction of these differences varied, with some disparities being stronger in urban than rural populations and vice versa. Despite elevated treatment utilization among some sexual minority groups, disparities in unmet SUD treatment need were prevalent across urbanicities and sexual identity groups.
Conclusions
Study findings highlight the ubiquity of disparities in SU, SUD, and unmet SUD treatment need affecting rural and urban sexual minority populations, while also demonstrating nuanced differences in disparities by urbanicity. The persistence of disparities in unmet SUD treatment need emphasizes the need for future research to identify factors contributing to this disparity and for policies that alleviate these disparities.
背景:与异性恋人群相比,性少数群体使用药物(SU)和药物使用失调(SUD)的风险较高。据推测,由于农村性少数群体面临更多的少数群体压力,且进入性少数群体社区的机会较少,因此这些差异在农村性少数群体中会被放大。然而,目前还缺乏研究来探讨影响城市性少数群体的 SU 差异,也很少有研究探讨性少数群体身份或城市性少数群体在 SUD 治疗利用方面的差异:我们利用 2015 年至 2019 年全国药物使用和健康调查的数据,研究了性少数群体和异性恋群体在 SU、SUD、SUD 治疗利用率和未满足的 SUD 治疗需求方面的差异,并检验了这些差异是否因城市而异:结果:结果表明,影响性少数群体的 SU 和 SUD 的差异在城市中普遍存在。一部分差异因城市而异,这些差异的方向也各不相同,有些差异在城市人口中比在农村人口中更明显,反之亦然。尽管一些性少数群体的治疗利用率较高,但未得到满足的 SUD 治疗需求方面的差异在不同城市和不同性身份群体中普遍存在:研究结果凸显了影响农村和城市性少数群体的 SU、SUD 和未满足的 SUD 治疗需求方面的普遍差异,同时也显示了城市性差异的细微差别。在未满足的 SUD 治疗需求方面持续存在的差异强调了未来研究的必要性,以确定造成这种差异的因素,并制定政策来缓解这些差异。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.