Assessment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Primary Care.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Lucas M Donovan, Thomas L Keller, Nancy H Stewart, Jennifer Wright, Laura J Spece, Kevin I Duan, Aristotle Leonhard, Brian N Palen, Martha E Billings, David H Au, Laura C Feemster
{"title":"Assessment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Primary Care.","authors":"Lucas M Donovan, Thomas L Keller, Nancy H Stewart, Jennifer Wright, Laura J Spece, Kevin I Duan, Aristotle Leonhard, Brian N Palen, Martha E Billings, David H Au, Laura C Feemster","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Observational studies link untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with adverse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The first step in addressing OSA is a clinical assessment. However, given competing demands and a lack of high-quality evidence, it is unclear how often such assessments occur. We explored the documentation of OSA assessment among patients with COPD in primary care, and the patient and provider characteristics associated with these assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with clinically diagnosed COPD at 2 primary care practices. We abstracted charts to determine whether providers assessed OSA, defined as documentation of symptoms, treatment, or a referral to sleep medicine. We performed multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the associations of patient and provider characteristics with OSA assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 641 patients with clinically diagnosed COPD, 146 (23%) had OSA assessed over a 1-year period. Positive associations with OSA assessment included body mass index ≥ 30 (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-7.0), pulmonary subspecialist visits (OR 3.9, 95%CI 2.4-6.3), and a prior sleep study demonstrating OSA documented within the electronic medical record (OR 18.0, 95%CI 9.0-35.8). Notably, patients identifying as Black were less likely to have OSA assessed than those identifying as White (OR 0.5, 95%CI 0.2-0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providers document an assessment of OSA among a quarter of patients with COPD. Our findings highlight the importance of future work to rigorously test the impact of assessment on important health outcomes. Our findings also reinforce that additional strategies are needed to improve the equitable delivery of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Observational studies link untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with adverse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The first step in addressing OSA is a clinical assessment. However, given competing demands and a lack of high-quality evidence, it is unclear how often such assessments occur. We explored the documentation of OSA assessment among patients with COPD in primary care, and the patient and provider characteristics associated with these assessments.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with clinically diagnosed COPD at 2 primary care practices. We abstracted charts to determine whether providers assessed OSA, defined as documentation of symptoms, treatment, or a referral to sleep medicine. We performed multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the associations of patient and provider characteristics with OSA assessment.

Results: Among 641 patients with clinically diagnosed COPD, 146 (23%) had OSA assessed over a 1-year period. Positive associations with OSA assessment included body mass index ≥ 30 (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-7.0), pulmonary subspecialist visits (OR 3.9, 95%CI 2.4-6.3), and a prior sleep study demonstrating OSA documented within the electronic medical record (OR 18.0, 95%CI 9.0-35.8). Notably, patients identifying as Black were less likely to have OSA assessed than those identifying as White (OR 0.5, 95%CI 0.2-0.9).

Conclusions: Providers document an assessment of OSA among a quarter of patients with COPD. Our findings highlight the importance of future work to rigorously test the impact of assessment on important health outcomes. Our findings also reinforce that additional strategies are needed to improve the equitable delivery of care.

评估基层医疗机构慢性阻塞性肺病患者的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。
研究目的:观察性研究发现,未经治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的不良后果有关。治疗 OSA 的第一步是进行临床评估。然而,由于各种需求相互竞争且缺乏高质量的证据,目前尚不清楚此类评估的频率。我们探讨了初级医疗中 COPD 患者的 OSA 评估记录,以及与这些评估相关的患者和医疗服务提供者的特征:我们在两家初级医疗机构对临床诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病的患者进行了横断面研究。我们摘录了病历,以确定医疗服务提供者是否对 OSA 进行了评估,评估的定义是:症状、治疗或转诊至睡眠医学科的记录。我们进行了多变量混合效应逻辑回归,以评估患者和医疗服务提供者的特征与 OSA 评估之间的关联:在 641 名临床诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病的患者中,有 146 人(23%)在一年内接受了 OSA 评估。与 OSA 评估呈正相关的特征包括:体重指数≥ 30(OR 3.5,95%CI 1.8-7.0)、肺部亚专科就诊(OR 3.9,95%CI 2.4-6.3)、电子病历中记录的先前睡眠研究显示 OSA(OR 18.0,95%CI 9.0-35.8)。值得注意的是,黑人患者接受 OSA 评估的可能性低于白人患者(OR 0.5,95%CI 0.2-0.9):提供者记录了四分之一 COPD 患者的 OSA 评估。我们的研究结果强调了未来工作的重要性,即严格检验评估对重要健康结果的影响。我们的研究结果还表明,需要采取更多策略来改善医疗服务的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信