Clinical and radiological consequences of delayed therapy escalation in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-19 DOI:10.5603/pjnns.97040
Małgorzata Popiel, Halina Bartosik-Psujek
{"title":"Clinical and radiological consequences of delayed therapy escalation in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Małgorzata Popiel, Halina Bartosik-Psujek","doi":"10.5603/pjnns.97040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>To evaluate the clinical and radiological consequences of delayed escalation of therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), in whom, despite finding platform therapy ineffective, high-efficacy drugs were introduced with a delay.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We performed a single-centre, observational study evaluating patients with RRMS for ineffectiveness of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Depending on the time of therapy escalation to high-efficacy drugs, the patients were divided into an early escalation or a late escalation group, both of which were then observed for 48 months. All patients underwent a neurological examination every six months and a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 12 months. The primary endpoint was a change in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score during the observation period. The secondary endpoint was the time to 6-month confirmed disability progression (6mCDP). In addition, we analysed the annualised relapse rate and the cumulative number of new Gd+ and T2 lesions on brain MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>165 patients were qualified for the analysis. On treatment initiation, mean age was 38 years (± 10.9), and mean EDSS was 1.41 ± 0.38. After 48 months, there was a statistically insignificant decrease in the EDSS score in the early escalation group (-0.17 ± 0.35; p > 0.05), while in the late escalation group there was an increase in the EDSS score. The highest increase was noted in the group in which the escalation was performed with a delay of more than two years (1.2 ± 0.63; p < 0.001), and moreover 80% of patients in this group met the 6mCDP criteria. The median time to 6mCDP was 4.6 years (LESC1) and 4.5 years (LESC2) in the late escalation groups. In the early escalation group, zero subjects met the 6mCDP criteria after 48 months of observation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In everyday practice, the long-term outcomes in patients with RRMS and disease activity, despite DMT being used, are more favourable after early implementation of high-efficacy drugs. Delaying therapy escalation results in the accumulation of permanent disability in patients with RRMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19132,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/pjnns.97040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the study: To evaluate the clinical and radiological consequences of delayed escalation of therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), in whom, despite finding platform therapy ineffective, high-efficacy drugs were introduced with a delay.

Material and methods: We performed a single-centre, observational study evaluating patients with RRMS for ineffectiveness of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Depending on the time of therapy escalation to high-efficacy drugs, the patients were divided into an early escalation or a late escalation group, both of which were then observed for 48 months. All patients underwent a neurological examination every six months and a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 12 months. The primary endpoint was a change in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score during the observation period. The secondary endpoint was the time to 6-month confirmed disability progression (6mCDP). In addition, we analysed the annualised relapse rate and the cumulative number of new Gd+ and T2 lesions on brain MRI.

Results: 165 patients were qualified for the analysis. On treatment initiation, mean age was 38 years (± 10.9), and mean EDSS was 1.41 ± 0.38. After 48 months, there was a statistically insignificant decrease in the EDSS score in the early escalation group (-0.17 ± 0.35; p > 0.05), while in the late escalation group there was an increase in the EDSS score. The highest increase was noted in the group in which the escalation was performed with a delay of more than two years (1.2 ± 0.63; p < 0.001), and moreover 80% of patients in this group met the 6mCDP criteria. The median time to 6mCDP was 4.6 years (LESC1) and 4.5 years (LESC2) in the late escalation groups. In the early escalation group, zero subjects met the 6mCDP criteria after 48 months of observation.

Conclusions: In everyday practice, the long-term outcomes in patients with RRMS and disease activity, despite DMT being used, are more favourable after early implementation of high-efficacy drugs. Delaying therapy escalation results in the accumulation of permanent disability in patients with RRMS.

复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者延迟治疗的临床和放射学后果。
研究目的评估复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者延迟升级治疗的临床和放射学后果:我们进行了一项单中心观察性研究,评估了 RRMS 患者使用改变病情疗法(DMT)的无效情况。根据患者接受高效药物治疗的时间,将其分为早期升级组和晚期升级组,然后对这两组患者进行为期48个月的观察。所有患者每6个月接受一次神经系统检查,每12个月接受一次脑磁共振成像(MRI)检查。主要终点是观察期内扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)评分的变化。次要终点是 6 个月确诊残疾进展时间(6mCDP)。此外,我们还分析了年化复发率以及脑磁共振成像上新出现的 Gd+ 和 T2 病灶的累计数量:165名患者符合分析条件。开始治疗时,平均年龄为 38 岁(± 10.9),平均 EDSS 为 1.41 ± 0.38。48 个月后,早期升级治疗组的 EDSS 评分下降(-0.17 ± 0.35;P > 0.05),无统计学意义,而晚期升级治疗组的 EDSS 评分有所上升。延迟两年以上进行升级治疗的组别中,EDSS评分上升幅度最大(1.2 ± 0.63;P < 0.001),而且该组别中有 80% 的患者符合 6mCDP 标准。在晚期升级组中,6mCDP的中位时间分别为4.6年(LESC1)和4.5年(LESC2)。在早期升级组中,0 名受试者在 48 个月的观察后达到了 6mCDP 标准:在日常实践中,尽管使用了 DMT,但 RRMS 和疾病活动期患者的长期疗效在早期使用高效药物后更为理想。延迟治疗升级会导致 RRMS 患者永久性残疾的累积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
27.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery is an official journal of the Polish Society of Neurology and the Polish Society of Neurosurgeons, aimed at publishing high quality articles within the field of clinical neurology and neurosurgery, as well as related subspecialties. For more than a century, the journal has been providing its authors and readers with the opportunity to report, discuss, and share the issues important for every-day practice and research advances in the fields related to neurology and neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信