A pilot study of the effects of phytoestrogen supplementation on postmenopausal endometrium.

Judith L Balk, Deborah A Whiteside, Gregory Naus, Emily DeFerrari, James M Roberts
{"title":"A pilot study of the effects of phytoestrogen supplementation on postmenopausal endometrium.","authors":"Judith L Balk, Deborah A Whiteside, Gregory Naus, Emily DeFerrari, James M Roberts","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was designed to assess endometrial histology in postmenopausal women not taking hormone replacement therapy, to evaluate side effects and efficacy of phytoestrogens in treating menopause-associated symptoms, and to determine whether 6 months of phytoestrogen supplementation altered endometrial histology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the effects of 6 months of dietary phytoestrogen supplementation versus placebo in postmenopausal women. Baseline endometrial biopsies were performed and, if adequate, nonhyperplastic, noncancerous, and nonovulatory, subjects were randomly assigned to receive daily placebo or soy cereal supplementation for 6 months. Study subjects completed baseline and weekly dietary, symptom, and side effect logs. Repeat endometrial biopsies were obtained at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects were recruited from January 1998 through June 2000. Twenty-seven subjects were randomized, and 19 completed the study. One (3.7%) baseline endometrial sample was weakly proliferative. All other baseline and final biopsies were consistent with atrophic, inactive endometrium. The maximum risk of endometrial stimulation with phytoestrogens is 35%. Hot flushes, night sweats, and vaginal dryness were significantly less severe at the final week of the study compared with baseline in the placebo group. Insomnia was more common in the treated group. There were no other statistically significant differences in symptoms or side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phytoestrogens did not cause stimulation of the endometrium. Insomnia was more frequent over the 6-month study in the soy group, whereas hot flushes, night sweats, and vaginal dryness improved from baseline in the placebo group but not in the soy group.</p>","PeriodicalId":502110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation","volume":"9 4","pages":"238-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to assess endometrial histology in postmenopausal women not taking hormone replacement therapy, to evaluate side effects and efficacy of phytoestrogens in treating menopause-associated symptoms, and to determine whether 6 months of phytoestrogen supplementation altered endometrial histology.

Methods: We performed a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the effects of 6 months of dietary phytoestrogen supplementation versus placebo in postmenopausal women. Baseline endometrial biopsies were performed and, if adequate, nonhyperplastic, noncancerous, and nonovulatory, subjects were randomly assigned to receive daily placebo or soy cereal supplementation for 6 months. Study subjects completed baseline and weekly dietary, symptom, and side effect logs. Repeat endometrial biopsies were obtained at 6 months.

Results: Subjects were recruited from January 1998 through June 2000. Twenty-seven subjects were randomized, and 19 completed the study. One (3.7%) baseline endometrial sample was weakly proliferative. All other baseline and final biopsies were consistent with atrophic, inactive endometrium. The maximum risk of endometrial stimulation with phytoestrogens is 35%. Hot flushes, night sweats, and vaginal dryness were significantly less severe at the final week of the study compared with baseline in the placebo group. Insomnia was more common in the treated group. There were no other statistically significant differences in symptoms or side effects.

Conclusion: Phytoestrogens did not cause stimulation of the endometrium. Insomnia was more frequent over the 6-month study in the soy group, whereas hot flushes, night sweats, and vaginal dryness improved from baseline in the placebo group but not in the soy group.

植物雌激素补充剂对绝经后子宫内膜影响的试点研究。
研究目的本研究旨在评估未接受激素替代疗法的绝经后妇女的子宫内膜组织学,评估植物雌激素治疗绝经相关症状的副作用和疗效,并确定补充6个月的植物雌激素是否会改变子宫内膜组织学:我们进行了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,比较绝经后妇女膳食中补充 6 个月植物雌激素与安慰剂的效果。对研究对象进行基线子宫内膜活检,如果活检结果充分、无增生、无癌变、无排卵,研究对象将被随机分配到每天服用安慰剂或大豆谷物补充剂,为期 6 个月。研究对象填写基线和每周饮食、症状和副作用日志。6 个月后重复子宫内膜活检:研究对象从 1998 年 1 月至 2000 年 6 月招募。27 名受试者被随机分配,其中 19 人完成了研究。一个(3.7%)基线子宫内膜样本呈弱增生。所有其他基线样本和最终活检样本均为萎缩、不活跃的子宫内膜。植物雌激素刺激子宫内膜的最大风险为 35%。在研究的最后一周,与安慰剂组的基线相比,潮热、盗汗和阴道干涩的程度明显减轻。治疗组的失眠症更为常见。在症状或副作用方面没有其他统计学上的显著差异:结论:植物雌激素不会刺激子宫内膜。在为期 6 个月的研究中,大豆治疗组更容易失眠,而安慰剂治疗组的潮热、盗汗和阴道干燥症状比基线有所改善,但大豆治疗组没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信