Lingual Artery as the Recipient Vessel of Choice in Patients Requiring a Second or Third Free Flap in Recurrent Oral Cancers and Vessel-Depleted Neck: A 5-Year Experience in a Single Institute.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2023-11-24 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1776899
Rajendra Dhondge, Mohsina Hussain, Archana Singh, Raj Nagarkar
{"title":"Lingual Artery as the Recipient Vessel of Choice in Patients Requiring a Second or Third Free Flap in Recurrent Oral Cancers and Vessel-Depleted Neck: A 5-Year Experience in a Single Institute.","authors":"Rajendra Dhondge, Mohsina Hussain, Archana Singh, Raj Nagarkar","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Reconstruction with free flaps becomes a challenge in recurrent cases having previously treated necks, in patients who have received prior radiation therapy or chemotherapy or both, and where the patient has already undergone free flap reconstruction in a prior surgery. Depleted cervical recipient vessels can increase the complexity of reconstruction in achieving successful free flap prefusion and thereby increasing flap thrombosis and eventually failure. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Over a period of 5 years from January 2018 to February 2023, we encountered a total of 22 cases of recurrent or second primary oral cancer with bilateral necks operated, postadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, and requiring a second or third free flap reconstruction. In most of the cases we resorted to the lingual artery as the recipient artery of choice. <b>Results</b>  No flap loss was reported. No cases were reexplored either for hematoma or for congestion. All patients recovered uneventfully. <b>Conclusion</b>  To the best of our knowledge, there has been no paper yet that focuses on the lingual artery to be the recipient vessel of choice in recurrent oral cancers. We find the lingual artery to be a reliable and safe option and advocate its usage as recipient vessel of choice in recurrent oral cancers requiring more than one free flap reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47204,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10721365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Reconstruction with free flaps becomes a challenge in recurrent cases having previously treated necks, in patients who have received prior radiation therapy or chemotherapy or both, and where the patient has already undergone free flap reconstruction in a prior surgery. Depleted cervical recipient vessels can increase the complexity of reconstruction in achieving successful free flap prefusion and thereby increasing flap thrombosis and eventually failure. Materials and Methods  Over a period of 5 years from January 2018 to February 2023, we encountered a total of 22 cases of recurrent or second primary oral cancer with bilateral necks operated, postadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, and requiring a second or third free flap reconstruction. In most of the cases we resorted to the lingual artery as the recipient artery of choice. Results  No flap loss was reported. No cases were reexplored either for hematoma or for congestion. All patients recovered uneventfully. Conclusion  To the best of our knowledge, there has been no paper yet that focuses on the lingual artery to be the recipient vessel of choice in recurrent oral cancers. We find the lingual artery to be a reliable and safe option and advocate its usage as recipient vessel of choice in recurrent oral cancers requiring more than one free flap reconstruction.

将舌动脉作为复发性口腔癌和颈部血管缺失患者第二次或第三次游离皮瓣的首选受体血管:一家研究所的五年经验。
导言:对于颈部曾接受过治疗的复发病例、曾接受过放疗或化疗或两者兼有的患者,以及曾在前一次手术中接受过游离皮瓣重建的患者,使用游离皮瓣进行重建是一项挑战。颈部受体血管枯竭会增加重建的复杂性,无法成功实现游离皮瓣预融合,从而增加皮瓣血栓形成,最终导致重建失败。材料与方法 自2018年1月至2023年2月的5年间,我们共遇到22例复发或二次原发性口腔癌患者,均为双侧颈部手术,术后辅助化放疗,需要进行第二次或第三次游离皮瓣重建。在大多数病例中,我们都选择了舌动脉作为受体动脉。结果 没有皮瓣脱落的报告。没有病例因血肿或充血而再次手术。所有患者均顺利康复。结论 据我们所知,目前还没有论文将舌动脉作为复发性口腔癌的首选受体血管。我们认为舌动脉是一种可靠、安全的选择,并主张将其作为需要进行一次以上游离皮瓣重建的复发性口腔癌的首选受体血管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
64
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery (ISSN : 0970-0358) is biannual publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Bioline International, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信