Leaders' Perspectives on Resources for Academic Success: Defining Clinical Effort, Academic Time, and Faculty Support.

Q2 Social Sciences
The Permanente journal Pub Date : 2024-03-15 Epub Date: 2023-12-11 DOI:10.7812/TPP/23.093
Madhusmita Misra, Grace C Huang, Anne E Becker, Carol K Bates
{"title":"Leaders' Perspectives on Resources for Academic Success: Defining Clinical Effort, Academic Time, and Faculty Support.","authors":"Madhusmita Misra, Grace C Huang, Anne E Becker, Carol K Bates","doi":"10.7812/TPP/23.093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>For academic promotion, clinical faculty are expected to excel in clinical care, teaching, and scholarship. Ensuring adequate protected time and resources to engage in scholarly work in the face of competing clinical responsibilities is critical. The authors examined academic leaders' perspectives across affiliate hospitals of a large medical school regarding the definition of clinical full-time effort and academic time, best practices to enable academic success, and barriers to faculty advancement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Open-ended, semistructured, individual interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of clinical department and division heads. Interview data were examined to illuminate the range and commonalities in practices and to identify successful approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews were conducted with 17 academic leaders across 6 affiliate hospitals. There was considerable variability in clinical full-time effort definition. \"Academic time,\" more accurately characterized as \"nonclinical time,\" was typically 1 day a week for nonshift specialties and mostly used for administrative work or completing clinical documentation. Certain departments were more explicit in designating and protecting time for academic pursuits; some had invested resources in intensive programs for academic advancement with built-in expectations for accountability. The impact of documentation burden was considerable in certain departments.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Marked variability exists in time allocations for clinical and academic work, as well as in resources for academic success. This supports the potential value of establishing standards for defining and protecting academic time, motivating clinical faculty to engage in academic work, and building accountability expectations. Sharing best practices and setting standards may enhance academic advancement. Strategies to reduce documentation burden may enhance wellness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/23.093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: For academic promotion, clinical faculty are expected to excel in clinical care, teaching, and scholarship. Ensuring adequate protected time and resources to engage in scholarly work in the face of competing clinical responsibilities is critical. The authors examined academic leaders' perspectives across affiliate hospitals of a large medical school regarding the definition of clinical full-time effort and academic time, best practices to enable academic success, and barriers to faculty advancement.

Methods: Open-ended, semistructured, individual interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of clinical department and division heads. Interview data were examined to illuminate the range and commonalities in practices and to identify successful approaches.

Results: Interviews were conducted with 17 academic leaders across 6 affiliate hospitals. There was considerable variability in clinical full-time effort definition. "Academic time," more accurately characterized as "nonclinical time," was typically 1 day a week for nonshift specialties and mostly used for administrative work or completing clinical documentation. Certain departments were more explicit in designating and protecting time for academic pursuits; some had invested resources in intensive programs for academic advancement with built-in expectations for accountability. The impact of documentation burden was considerable in certain departments.

Discussion and conclusion: Marked variability exists in time allocations for clinical and academic work, as well as in resources for academic success. This supports the potential value of establishing standards for defining and protecting academic time, motivating clinical faculty to engage in academic work, and building accountability expectations. Sharing best practices and setting standards may enhance academic advancement. Strategies to reduce documentation burden may enhance wellness.

领导者对学术成功资源的看法:定义临床努力、学术时间和教师支持。
介绍:为获得学术晋升,临床教师应在临床护理、教学和学术研究方面表现出色。面对相互竞争的临床职责,确保有足够的时间和资源从事学术工作至关重要。作者研究了一所大型医学院附属医院的学术带头人对临床全职工作和学术时间的定义、学术成功的最佳实践以及教师晋升障碍的看法:对临床科室和部门负责人进行了开放式、半结构化的个别访谈。对访谈数据进行了研究,以揭示实践的范围和共性,并找出成功的方法:对 6 家附属医院的 17 名学术带头人进行了访谈。临床全职工作的定义存在很大差异。"学术时间 "更准确地说是 "非临床时间",对于非轮班专科来说,通常每周一天,主要用于行政工作或完成临床文件。某些科室在指定和保护学术活动时间方面更为明确;有些科室投入资源开展了强化的学术进修计划,并对责任进行了明确规定。在某些科室,文件负担的影响相当大:在临床和学术工作的时间分配以及学术成功的资源方面存在明显差异。这证明了制定标准以定义和保护学术时间、激励临床教师参与学术工作以及建立问责预期的潜在价值。分享最佳实践和制定标准可促进学术进步。减轻文件负担的策略可提高健康水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信