Comparison of different internal fixation implants in the treatment of talar neck fractures: A finite element analysis.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Joint diseases and related surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2023.1280
Xin Fu, Hong-Bin Cao, Nan Li, Gui-Xin Wang, Jin-Quan He
{"title":"Comparison of different internal fixation implants in the treatment of talar neck fractures: A finite element analysis.","authors":"Xin Fu, Hong-Bin Cao, Nan Li, Gui-Xin Wang, Jin-Quan He","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2023.1280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the biomechanics of cannulated screws (CS) with or without a lateral locking plate (LLP) in talar neck fractures through a finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The computed tomography image of the talus from a healthy volunteer (adult male) was used to reconstruct a three-dimensional talar model. The method for fixing talar neck fractures with CS and an LLP was planned using computer-aided design software. Afterward, the three-dimensional models of comminuted talar neck fractures were used to simulate fixation with anteroposterior parallel dual CS, single CS+LLP, and dual CS+LLP. Finally, finite element analysis was carried out to compare the outcomes of dual CS+LLP to those of single CS+LLP and to those of using dual CS alone. The displacement and von Mises stress values of the three groups with different internal fixation were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For a simple talar neck fracture, the lowest amount of displacement was obtained with CS+LLP (0.407 mm), while dual CS (0.459 mm) showed the highest amount of total displacement; the lowest amount of peak stresses was obtained with CS+LLP (5.38 MPa), while dual CS (8.749 MPa) showed the highest amount of total peak stresses. For a comminuted talar neck fracture, the lowest amount of displacement was obtained with CS+LLP (0.398 mm), while dual CS (0.408 mm) showed the highest amount of total displacement; the lowest amount of peak stresses was obtained with CS+LLP (129.9 MPa), while dual CS (205.9 MPa) showed the highest amount of peak stresses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the other two groups, the dual CS+LLP group had better biomechanics properties in the displacement and stress peak of the talus and implant. Thus, the use of dual CS+LLP fixation is recommended for the surgical treatment of comminuted talar neck fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":"27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10746907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the biomechanics of cannulated screws (CS) with or without a lateral locking plate (LLP) in talar neck fractures through a finite element analysis.

Patients and methods: The computed tomography image of the talus from a healthy volunteer (adult male) was used to reconstruct a three-dimensional talar model. The method for fixing talar neck fractures with CS and an LLP was planned using computer-aided design software. Afterward, the three-dimensional models of comminuted talar neck fractures were used to simulate fixation with anteroposterior parallel dual CS, single CS+LLP, and dual CS+LLP. Finally, finite element analysis was carried out to compare the outcomes of dual CS+LLP to those of single CS+LLP and to those of using dual CS alone. The displacement and von Mises stress values of the three groups with different internal fixation were analyzed.

Results: For a simple talar neck fracture, the lowest amount of displacement was obtained with CS+LLP (0.407 mm), while dual CS (0.459 mm) showed the highest amount of total displacement; the lowest amount of peak stresses was obtained with CS+LLP (5.38 MPa), while dual CS (8.749 MPa) showed the highest amount of total peak stresses. For a comminuted talar neck fracture, the lowest amount of displacement was obtained with CS+LLP (0.398 mm), while dual CS (0.408 mm) showed the highest amount of total displacement; the lowest amount of peak stresses was obtained with CS+LLP (129.9 MPa), while dual CS (205.9 MPa) showed the highest amount of peak stresses.

Conclusion: Compared to the other two groups, the dual CS+LLP group had better biomechanics properties in the displacement and stress peak of the talus and implant. Thus, the use of dual CS+LLP fixation is recommended for the surgical treatment of comminuted talar neck fractures.

比较不同的内固定植入物治疗距骨颈骨折:有限元分析
研究目的本研究旨在通过有限元分析,分析带或不带外侧锁定钢板(LLP)的套管螺钉(CS)在距骨颈骨折中的生物力学:使用健康志愿者(成年男性)的距骨计算机断层扫描图像重建三维距骨模型。使用计算机辅助设计软件规划了用 CS 和 LLP 固定距骨颈骨折的方法。随后,利用粉碎性距骨颈骨折的三维模型模拟了前后平行双 CS、单 CS+LLP 和双 CS+LLP 固定。最后,进行了有限元分析,以比较双 CS+LLP 与单 CS+LLP 和单独使用双 CS 的结果。结果:对于单纯性距骨颈骨折,CS+LLP 的位移量最小(0.407 mm),而双 CS 的总位移量最大(0.459 mm);CS+LLP 的峰值应力最小(5.38 MPa),而双 CS 的总峰值应力最大(8.749 MPa)。对于粉碎性距骨颈骨折,CS+LLP 的位移量最小(0.398 毫米),而双 CS 的总位移量最大(0.408 毫米);CS+LLP 的峰值应力最小(129.9 兆帕),而双 CS 的峰值应力最大(205.9 兆帕):结论:与其他两组相比,双 CS+LLP 组在距骨和植入物的位移和应力峰值方面具有更好的生物力学特性。因此,在手术治疗粉碎性距骨颈骨折时,推荐使用 CS+LLP 双固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信